How Is Rene Descartes Real

Improved Essays
Descartes’s Realizations
During the Enlightenment period, people explored the reality of all things; in the nature of religion, mathematics, or science, et cetera. Often thought of as the Age of Reason, the enlightenment period brought a whole new way of thinking along with it. Before this era, people used to do just do as they were told and not question why they were doing these things, or they were too afraid to ask why. Belief in a concept or ideal seemed to come out of the progressive general facts that lead into a final conclusion. Thinking this way is exactly how Rene Descartes thought when he reaches his famous maxim, “I think, therefore I am.” Through this statement one can believe that Descartes knows he is real because he could think
…show more content…
The idea that everything must be questioned is seen throughout the entire enlightenment period. Examples are shown in the works of many other philosophers. Among these, Immanuel Kant said “Have courage to use your own reason.”(Kant 105) Kant’s statement means that people should not just do what they are told or obey everything they are commanded to do, but question all that is around you and use your own reason instead of relying on that of the authority figure. The basic principle of thinking for your own has brought humankind very far since then. The individual reasoning and logic has created a breeding ground for innovation and …show more content…
This is displayed widely in the Enlightenment period, through the sheer variety of all the different ideas that people pondered and the avenues they take to get to these realizations. The topics that the philosophers of this time were very broad. For example Jean Jacques Rousseau explored ideas from education all the way to religion.(Bertram) The point of this way of thinking is to have a large pool of data to select from in order to come to a final conclusion about one’s personal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Enlightening Way to Govern Humans are always trying to find an answer to everything they do or can’t explain. For example, in Greek mythology their religion was based around stories of different gods and their adventures. The outcome of these stories explained something as simple as how the sun traveled across the sky. You can find many other folk tales or regional stories explaining how the sun travels across the sky as well. These stories were created to try to explain something that is unexplained to the common man, but when philosophers started questioning them and thinking for themselves, it probed the self-thinking movement known as the age of enlightenment.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditations on First Philosophy/Meditation 1 Descartes insists that we might not have any surety in our knowledge. He concludes that reality as we know it is false, and we are ultimately deceived. This is interesting because there is no way to prove we can determine whether this is true or false logic. The claim has no intent on changing our daily actions, our moral beliefs, or our role in the universe, but is intended to bring us into open-mindedness. If we allow ourselves to accept the plausibility of our true being in reality, then we surely have the mindset that is driven toward enlightenment.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes, the famous French philosopher and brilliant 17th century Scholar is credited worldwide as the founder of modern western philosophy for his works in the fields of Ontology – a branch of metaphysics regarding the ‘nature of being’- and Epistemology – the study of knowledge. What set him apart from the ancient philosophers was his avoidance of the scholastic traditions to write only in Latin (the language that only highly educated people were trained in) and instead wrote in French so that even the common population could read and reflect on his works, as well as his refusal to accept the vast majority of Aristotelian views into his philosophy. On top of this his anti-elitist views – the idea that truth is not exclusive to scholars…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, some familiarity with his Discourse on Methods might shine some light on the errors that were not repeated by Descartes in the Meditations. The background that forms both of these important works is Descartes taking the “Copernican Revolution” to heart. Descartes endeavored to know what is real, and what is not. Descartes assumed that if he could come up with a reason for doubting something, he would. It is important distinction to recognize that Descartes is not doubting everything; a common misconception, which should be easily cleared up by reading…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But he cannot doubt that he has a mind, i.e. that he thinks. So he knows he exists even though he doesn’t know whether or not he has a body. From this Descartes concludes that it is possible for him to exist without a body. He is essentially a mind, not a body. He would not necessarily cease to be himself if he ceased to have a body, but he would necessarily cease to be himself if he didn’t have a…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The aim of this paper is to explain how Descartes gets to his first certainty I think, I am (Meditation II). Descartes argues that he cannot doubt whatsoever he thinks. He reasons that doubting is a way of thinking. He remains affirmative about his existence and says even if the devil made him doubt that he existed, to him that will surely mean that he certainly exists. Nothing that can be proven not to exist to does exist when remarking about Descartes quote.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Huemer’s essay, “The Lure of Radical Skepticism,” he expands on the idea that ‘we cannot know anything,’ by outlining four different arguments supporting the claim. (Huemer 47-57) René Descartes holds the opposite opinion, which he discusses in ‘Meditations One and Two.’ While there is validity to both sides of the argument, Huemer’s essay proves to be more reliable after dissecting Descartes’ concepts of existence. Huemer proposes that no one can know anything about the external world, or anything that exists outside of the mind.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Only those who have experienced the journey of discovering the true reality from false perceptions can guide others to escape the ignorance they live in. The process of Jesus earning all authority after his resurrection is similar to the mind power one can have once they know the true reality of what they live. To be freed from the ignorant state of mind and enjoy the power of choosing to perceive the contrived reality or the truth, it is essential to be guided by someone who has already been enlightened and that will help one pass through the treacherous process of learning how to change the fictitious perception. Once people are shown the truth by someone who has already been enlightened, the views on perception is chosen by the…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    “Aristotelian science had taught that the fundamental units of being were substances, in which qualities or ‘accidents’ were lodged: thus, a cow is a substance, the redness of the cow an accident. Descartes abolished this distinction, holding, instead, that everything physical that exists is simply matter in space.” “Descartes believed that he could infallibly deduce another crucial principle: the existence of a good God, who guarantees the truth of my perceptions and so underwrites the existence of the world” (Kirsch 2016). At this point in time, Descartes believes that he is more modern than those he has succeeded. However, it can be predicted that when someone after him advances his research and or deems it something unworthy of acknowledgement, as did Gottlieb, due to more recent findings, Descartes would have the same kinds of emotions as John Donne and…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosopher René Descartes expresses his belief that he has proven the existence of God beginning in Meditation III. By this time in his meditations, Descartes has concluded that the only thing he can be sure of is that he exists and is a thinking thing. Through this thinking, he concludes that he knows nothing for certain. Descartes begins considering the existence of God by examining the contents of his mind. It is through his innate idea of God that Descartes concludes that God exists, and through God’s existence his understanding of the material world as a whole is concluded.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Rationalism is the belief that at least some knowledge about reality can be acquired through reason, independently of sense experience.”. Rationalism was a philosophical movement that appeared around 500 BC and is often described as one of the most important theories of philosophy. It consist of three main basic claims: The Intuition/Deduction Thesis, The Innate Knowledge Thesis and the The Innate Concept Thesis. For a philosopher to claim himself as a rationalist, he has to apply at least one of these three thesis. Rationalist were constantly questioning what was real..…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes associates as an Early Modern Thinker as he obtains opposing views from the Medieval Period. Descartes believes that the Medieval Period thinkers suffer corruption because of their theocentric views and negligence regarding advancing knowledge, as the medieval thinkers practice exegesis. Descartes concludes that an intellectual revolution is necessary in order to completely break with the corrupt past in order to gain new knowledge and truths. In order to achieve new truths and most certain knowledge, Descartes yearns for indubitably, the inability to doubt claims.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays