Why Is Descartes Innate Idea Of God

Improved Essays
The philosopher René Descartes expresses his belief that he has proven the existence of God beginning in Meditation III. By this time in his meditations, Descartes has concluded that the only thing he can be sure of is that he exists and is a thinking thing. Through this thinking, he concludes that he knows nothing for certain. Descartes begins considering the existence of God by examining the contents of his mind. It is through his innate idea of God that Descartes concludes that God exists, and through God’s existence his understanding of the material world as a whole is concluded. Descartes begins pondering the existence of God by reflecting on his idea of God. Because he has decided not to believe in anything without sufficient reason, he analyzes the contents of his own mind, the different types of ideas he has and whether they hold any truth or not. He establishes that he as three different types of …show more content…
He establishes that he is included in the category of finite beings. Because of the relationship he established between formal reality and objective reality, he concludes that he and can conceive of other ideas outside of himself because they are finite as well. With this same reasoning, he should not be able to conceive of something infinite—such as God--because he is finite. This leads him to believe that the idea of God is an innate idea—an idea we have by nature. Once Descartes establishes his innate understanding of God, he searches for the possible cause of his idea. It is obvious to him the idea of God could not have come from himself because God is perfect, and infinite, which Descartes is not nor has he ever experienced. Therefore; God is the ultimate cause of our idea of God, because Descartes could not have been the cause of the idea because he is not infinite and the idea of something can only come from something that truly is. Thus, God exists and is the cause of our idea of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Descartes fifth Meditation presents the Ontological Argument for God’s Existence. Though many people find Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence to be an unpersuasive and weak argument, I find it is a very strong argument that provides a strong foundation and argument for God’s existence. In this paper I plan to elaborate upon Descartes fifth meditation and slightly over the first and third. After this I will then explain its strong points and weaknesses. I believe Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence in Meditation five to be a strong and persuasive argument.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The premises of his argument explicitly draw upon the questions. Moreover, even if there is a supreme being that exists, how can it be proved that he gave us these faculties of will and intellect or that he has any interaction with us or cares about us whatsoever? His argument for God as a reason to believe all that one perceives is truth is more of a statement go faith than it is logic. Proving God’s existence is significant to the meditations because it is the only way to bring back the outside world, outside of the mind. For me, the only veridical foundation Descartes intellectual project finds is that…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes tries to make sense of the existence of God by using Adequate reality, the belief that an idea must have as much formal reality as it has objective…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will be explaining a meditation in Rene Descartes’ book, Meditations on First Philosophy. First I will summarize how he got to his point in meditation three, and then I will give my opinion on whether or not his claims are successful or unsuccessful. In meditation three Rene Descartes tries convincing the reader that God actually does exist. He starts off by briefly explaining the first two meditations.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes introduces us to his philosophies by taking everything he thinks he knows, and destroying it. He decides to rebuild his knowledge of the absolute truth by tearing down all of his prior knowledge of the mind and soul, God, and the senses. Throughout this essay, I will discuss Descartes’s two arguments that prove God’s existence, and then I will analyze them. And finally, I will bring up a criticism from Kant, as well as exploring some criticisms of my own.…

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes begins this argument with the confirmation that God exists. He suggests that God exists because…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In his Meditations on First Philosophy, René Descartes offers both an a priori and an a posteriori proof of God’s existence. Until Immanuel Kant introduced his epistemology—the notion of a priori synthetic judgments—Descartes’ a priori proof was generally considered purely demonstrative and analytic. However, analyzing Descartes using Kant’s epistemological foundations, reveals that Descartes’ a priori proof was both a priori and synthetic. Specifically, the Cartesian concept of clear and distinct perceptions, neatly mirrors the Kantian notion of synthetic judgments. The following will 1) explore and explain Descartes’ a priori proof of God’s existence and Kant’s epistemology, and 2) demonstrate how Descartes fused the a priori and synthetic to prove God’s existence.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes may not be able to know the truth, but this will allow him to not fall for what is false. In his second meditation, Descartes expresses that everything he sees is not real and that his memories, senses, or physical surroundings cannot be trusted. For a moment, Descartes doubts his own existence, questioning whether it is he who controls his own thoughts or if it is a higher power, God, who has control over him. Descartes also denies the notion of body, sense, and mind; he almost denies his entire existence but resolves this statement by saying that if an evil demon is trying to deceive him then…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the finality of Descartes' first meditation, the meditator is already facing supreme doubt of all formerly inherited and empirical knowledge and builds an approach towards creating a foundation of doubt on all previous beliefs. Believing to have called all of their beliefs into question, the meditator still demands reason to doubt arithmetic and geometric knowledge – a knowledge that to them feels most intuitive; a “perfect knowledge”. To this, the meditator raises a hypothesis that applies their belief in god: The meditator's detailed argument is as follows: P1. I firmly believe that there is an all-powerful god who created me. P2.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes’s mission in the meditations was to doubt everything and that what remained from his doubting could be considered the truth. This lead Descartes to argue for the existence of God. For the purpose of this paper, I will first discuss Descartes’s argument for the existence of God within the third and fifth meditations. I will then take issue with three of Descartes arguments. Descartes argues that some ideas are more real than others.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    He decides to dump everything he thought was true and start over. Everything he admits has the least bit of doubt should be declared as completely false. If there is someone who instills thoughts in him, who thought of someone instilling thoughts in him? He wonders if he is the author of these thoughts. Descartes also persuaded himself there was nothing in the world, including the sky, the earth, minds, bodies, and even…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At the beginning of his fourth meditation, Descartes begins reflecting on the three main certainties that he has developed so far: 1) that God exists, 2) that God is not a deceiver, and 3) that God created him and is therefore responsible for all his faculties, including his faculty of judgment. Descartes seems satisfied with the first two convictions, however, he begins to explore the conflict that arises with the third; that, “if everything that is in me comes from God, and he did not endow me with a faculty for making mistakes, it appears that I can never go wrong” (Descartes and Cottingham 38). This dilemma, also known as the “Problem of Error”, prompts the need for Descartes to reconcile the two, seemingly contradictory positions. While…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will argue that Descartes, using his own criteria for making and avoiding mistakes, cannot be making a mistake when he proves the existence of God in meditation three in his Meditations on First Philosophy. I will develop my argument in two parts. First, I will present Descartes’s argument for how mistakes are made and avoided.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays