Why Is Descartes Innate Idea Of God

Improved Essays
The philosopher René Descartes expresses his belief that he has proven the existence of God beginning in Meditation III. By this time in his meditations, Descartes has concluded that the only thing he can be sure of is that he exists and is a thinking thing. Through this thinking, he concludes that he knows nothing for certain. Descartes begins considering the existence of God by examining the contents of his mind. It is through his innate idea of God that Descartes concludes that God exists, and through God’s existence his understanding of the material world as a whole is concluded. Descartes begins pondering the existence of God by reflecting on his idea of God. Because he has decided not to believe in anything without sufficient reason, he analyzes the contents of his own mind, the different types of ideas he has and whether they hold any truth or not. He establishes that he as three different types of …show more content…
He establishes that he is included in the category of finite beings. Because of the relationship he established between formal reality and objective reality, he concludes that he and can conceive of other ideas outside of himself because they are finite as well. With this same reasoning, he should not be able to conceive of something infinite—such as God--because he is finite. This leads him to believe that the idea of God is an innate idea—an idea we have by nature. Once Descartes establishes his innate understanding of God, he searches for the possible cause of his idea. It is obvious to him the idea of God could not have come from himself because God is perfect, and infinite, which Descartes is not nor has he ever experienced. Therefore; God is the ultimate cause of our idea of God, because Descartes could not have been the cause of the idea because he is not infinite and the idea of something can only come from something that truly is. Thus, God exists and is the cause of our idea of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Existence Of God

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Cottingham, in his book Descartes, affirms that "The problem is given special piquancy by Descartes ' own statement (...) that 'the certainty and truth of all knowledge depends on my knowledge of the true God ' ". This suggests that the knowledge of God should be axiomatic - but it isn 't. Although all the knowledge depends on the knowledge of true God, Descartes ' does not have, at the starting point, any knowledge of God. He shouldn 't be able to give forth any certain and truthful judgment, yet he claims to do so. Apparently, Descartes employs 'clear and distinct ideas ' in demonstrating that God exists (when he perceives clearly and distinctly that 'existence ' is an essential attribute of God or when he puts forth the causal principle) and then justifies the truthfulness of the clear and distinct ideas by the existence of God.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All of these men explain their stance on religion, God and they give insight on their theological differences according to Humes stance on religious beliefs. The first objection that Hume would have according to Aquinas reasoning is his example with the idea of change. Cleanthes wouldn’t object to this because Aquinas ultimately believes that intelligent design from the govern world is all occurring because of God. However, Cleanthes feel that we can take…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    He states that he has more grasp of the human mind than the perception of corporeal things. He has no doubt that God exist and is complete and independent unlike him who is incomplete and dependent on God. He believes that his perception of God has been instilled in him by the very entity and has ruled out deception, for deception can only be the work of the devil. He asserts infallibility of the perception of God because the very idea is instilled in him by God. He finds himself in the maze of circular reasoning about not erring about God because God is an entity that cannot err so the premise fulfills the conclusion.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is followed by the premise given at the beginning of the Third Meditation in which thoughts that Descartes can vividly see must be true. Descartes’ clear innate idea of a perfect being is true only if God exists and is not a deceiver. Altogether, Descartes believes that his innate ideas are true and the “Problem of the External World” can be solved through proving the existence of a perfect being using Connection Principle. However, the main objection with Descartes’ argument is how he is able to transition from representational reality to intrinsic reality. Descartes does not clearly define what the Connection Principle…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believe that every effect must have a cause because “something can’t arise from nothing” (Descartes, 1641, p.12). This assumption means that something would have to have given Descartes the idea of God because it would not have been able to come from nothing or just appear in his…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes replies by arguing that by referring to an idea of God, he means what is perceived in the mind and that he uses the term idea because it is used in philosophy to reference perceptions in the mind (Third Objections: CSM II 126-7). Descartes argues that Hobbes should provide his own idea of God and that he is only using the term idea in a manner that suits his argument, which is a __ fallacy. Though I believe Descartes response to Hobbes here is valid, I still find premise 1 questionable because it assumes that all humans have the same specific ideas about God, which may not be true especially considering Descartes does not provide…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I can conjure the idea of God by simply thinking away my limitations. In other words, because I am the opposite of God, being finite and imperfect, perhaps I could be the cause of something ‘not imperfect’ and ‘not finite’. Descartes responds saying that this negative conception of infinity and perfection is not the idea of God – instead the idea of God requires a positive conception of these properties and not the absence of limits, but something for which there can be no limits. Nevertheless, this requirement conflicts with Descartes’ claim that as finite minds, we cannot form a clear idea of God’s infinity but also, whilst the idea of God is not clear, Descartes claims that it is clearly and distinctly a positive idea (not negative) – this seems very contradictory since an idea is not distinct unless it is clearly separated from all other ideas. Descartes must insist that the idea of God is positive as if it was negative, then it would become possible that we are the cause of God as we are finite beings.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plurality Of God Analysis

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thus, the concept of God from a negative point of view includes oneness, which becomes the presupposition of any manifestation of God. Crucially, God is not a one as opposed to a plurality, as it would be in the dogmatic context. Instead, God 's oneness escapes the dichotomy between the one and the many. This follows because if God is being itself, then all entities participate fundamentally in him as the source of their being. Thus, he is what gives ground and precedes the relationship between the one and the many, insofar as he is the source of the elements of this opposition.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spinoza, subscribing to monism, claims that thoughts and bodies are merely facets of God’s perfection; they are one of the infinite extensions and modes of the one true substance, because if anything exists outside of God, God cannot be said to be perfect for He would be limited. Since Spinoza defines an infinite substance as “which is in itself, and is conceived through itself” (Part I, Definition III), having a finite substance would thus be a contradiction. Everything else are hence, modifications As such, while Spinoza and Descartes designate God as the one infinite substance, they have different conceptions of the God’s relation to things due to their dissimilar ontological…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Given that we have an idea of God, the light of nature says that something equally as powerful of more powerful had to have caused it. In effect, due to its infinite nature, we couldn’t have caused it. Only an infinite being could have caused it. This clear and distinct idea of God, along with the facts of the light of nature, shows us that God exists., On that account, God’s perfection assures us that we are not in a dream, that the world is actually the way we perceive it to…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays