Hippocratic Argument Analysis

Decent Essays
If it is a physician's job to do no harm, and a patient is in constant pain is it not the more merciful action to take to make the patient finally at peace. Whether it be merely suggesting aided death as an option or prescribing the lethal dose of medication, physicians should feel obligated to have this legalized for their patients. “ As it is stated in this article the author says that the Hippocratic oath says a physician will do no harm, that harm may include prolonging a life of a dying patient. Yes, it is a physician's job to heal and to make a patient's life as long as possible, but are they really following their oath when a patient is asking for death” (Bloustein). Some say this is ethically wrong for a doctor to make the respectful

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    “We honor our past because it shapes our future,” this is one of the many quotes that Otterbein University holds dearly. Otterbein University holds this value greatly. Otterbein gives equality to all students, faculty, and others since 1847. Before any women’s rights and the abolishment of slavery, Otterbein University allowed people of color and women to receive a fair and equal education. Otterbein University is a mid-sized college located in Westerville, Ohio.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death With Dignity: A Commentary Sergej Jagodin Millersville University Medical Aid in Dying: A Commentary The ability to choose when to die is not a topic that is heavily discussed throughout a person’s life. What constitutes dying early and on one’s own terms? Is it moral? Is it right?…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Terri Schiavo was a right-to-die case involving a woman who was in an irreversible persistent vegetative state in the United States from 1990 to 2005. Schiavo family debated on her behalf to be remove from the feeding tube if it was not going to help her recover and finally it took President George W. Bush seven years before ultimately removing Terri feeding tube. Euthanasia or better known as assisted suicide is “the act or practice of causing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (such as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy” and can be categories as non-voluntary, involuntary, and voluntary or passive, and active. Involuntary euthanasia is conducted without consent; voluntary…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As long as the patient is suffering with excruciating pain, it should be his or her right to choose whether or not they want to request assistance in hastening their death. Going back to a person’s well-being, if death is inevitable in the long run, than there is no harm in quickening the process because the physician is helping them end their suffering not prolong it. Also, in regards to Beauchamp’s argument that law and medicine interfere with the patient’s right to choose how they want to proceed with their time left, we, as Americans, have freewill, and with that it gives us the opportunity to choose how we live our lives. However, some might say it is against the law to kill a human being, but is it really killing when the person is going to die eventually? With physician-assisted suicide the patient must be fully aware in requesting aid in ending their…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. Physician-assisted suicide, under various names and colloquial definitions, has been a documented ethical issue for centuries – not to mention an undocumented ethical issue since the hypothetical dawn of life. By common understanding, physician-assisted suicide is death either directly or indirectly permitted or carried out by a physician. In simple terms, an “out” is provided. For this reason, it is often associated with chronic pain or terminal illness. Suicide where the doctor in charge is directly involved is perhaps the first situation which comes to mind when one thinks of euthanasia.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A common moral argument against Physician Assisted Suicide is that it disobeys the Hippocratic Oath: the set of moral guidelines for any doctor or administrator of medicine. The section which is specifically referenced by such opponents is “Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course” (INSERT CITATION). However, the Hippocratic Oath (the original version, in particular) fails to provide an effective basis for opposing PAS because it is irrelevant to modern medicine. One…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is the act of killing someone painlessly, usually by giving them a lethal dose of medication. This practice is banned in almost all of the states since it is seen as morally wrong. In addition, physicians have lived by the Hippocratic Oath for more than two-thousand years. The code clearly states a physician’s role as a healer and that under no circumstances should they administer deadly medicine; euthanasia goes directly against the Hippocratic Oath…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Hippocratic Oath, although the giving of deadly medicine to anyone who asks is prohibited, the role of a physician is to provide the best treatment for the patient. Therefore, in some cases, hastening death will be the best treatment (Citation). They also claim euthanasia is opposite to the laws of humanity, but they are neglecting the laws of nature, which were established long before mankind. Protecting from death or prolonging our lives is against nature. It is the act of breaking the balance of nature (Source log 11-Citation).…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    From a patient’s perspective that is in suffering, physician-assisted suicide might seem like a god send. The option to be relieved from the pain of a slow death at the cost of immediately ending their life seems grim and pointless, but to the dying, perhaps not. It was found that requests for euthanasia are frequently made by patients to doctors that practice specialties typically revolving around terminal patients. [Meier, D., Emmons, C. A., Wallenstein, S., Quill, T., Morrison, R. S., & Cassel, C. K., 1998]. The reasons patients ask for physicians to take part in ending their life are usually if they are in extreme pain, are a burden upon family members or caregivers, or have no personal dignity left.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This oath is a precedent taken by all medical students and states that doctors will “do no harm” to their patients. While one may believe that “do no harm” means keeping a patient alive at all costs to preserve their life, others who agree with physician assisted suicide see “do no harm” in a different way. “Do no harm” can ironically also mean not allowing a patient to feel extreme suffering and pain. There is no incentive of a patient receiving pain because if they are terminally ill they will most likely pass within the next few months (Braddock, 2013). What does more harm, allowing the patient to decide to take their life at their own free will, or allowing them to endure suffering until their inevitable death?…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article Doctors debate the ethics of Assisted Suicide written by Elizabeth Aguilera and was published on May 18,2015. Dr Vincent Nguyen says that “We are here to protect the people who are sick, and we are here to promote health and in the event we cannot cure the person, healing can still take place”, he also says that “ the real reason that he is against assisted suicide is that doctors take the Hippocratic oath and that is why doctors go into medicine”. This quote helps because when a doctor signs the Hippocratic oath it helps shape the moral value and that a doctor wants to help cure someone, not help someone end their life, if they know the person might have a chance of getting better, then a doctor is telling a person…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the beginning of humanity, our actions as humans have been propelled by a single universal fear that shapes nearly every decision we make: death. Our most basic primal instincts are based on the singular idea of self-preservation, so our need to prolong our own lives as much as possible even as we continue to live is hardly surprising. However, death is unavoidable in the grand scheme of things, and some are forced to accept this fact long before they are actually faced with their death. Today, a widely-debated topic is based on this idea: should doctors be allowed to prescribe lethal drugs to terminally ill patients in order to assist them in suicide? I think that physicians should be allowed to assist terminally ill patients in suicide because of the promise of a painless death, a quick transition in passing, the patient’s right to their own life, and the ability for the patient to make their own decisions regarding their death.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The issue of whether critically ill patients should be permitted to seek the doctor’s assistance in removing their extreme sufferings by putting an end to their lives continues to be debated heatedly with the same intensity as it has always been done for the last several decades. In fact, the last few years have seen the debate getting more intensified because of enhanced perceptions about its significance in the American political scenario. So far, physician assisted death in America has mostly been prohibited legally through the introduction of statutory laws or through the application of detailed statutes. Nevertheless, attempts have always been made by different sections of society to change the laws through the adoption of different legal…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our loved ones are the most important people in our lives, and making treatment a priority for those who are dying should be our top concern. Patients with terminal illnesses should not have the ability to willingly end their own lives. It should be illegal for a doctor to administer euthanasia because it goes against the Hippocratic Oath, eradicates any chances of consensual research and testing, and defies the principle that a human life is priceless. It would be unethical to allow people to end their own lives if treatment is still possible, as this would go against the principle of “first, do no harm”, as stated by the Hippocratic Oath. The Hippocratic Oath is a pledge originally written in the 5th Century that contains the moral and…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays