Our loved ones are the most important people in our lives, and making treatment a priority for those who are dying should be our top concern. Patients with terminal illnesses should not have the ability to willingly end their own lives. It should be illegal for a doctor to administer euthanasia because it goes against the Hippocratic Oath, eradicates any chances of consensual research and testing, and defies the principle that a human life is priceless. It would be unethical to allow people to end their own lives if treatment is still possible, as this would go against the principle of “first, do no harm”, as stated by the Hippocratic Oath. The Hippocratic Oath is a pledge originally written in the 5th Century that contains the moral and
…show more content…
In a cruel and unnecessary twist, Max received access to a clinical trial; Austin didn’t. As a result, Max was able to get out of his wheelchair and play on his school soccer team while Austin continued to deteriorate until he could not even feed himself (Olsen 1).
If a patient in such a condition chooses to participate in a research study, they would be able to offset the costs of intensive or end-of-life care. Furthermore, the money spent annually on healthcare adds up to approximately: “$50 billion just for doctor and hospital bills during the last two months of patients' lives” (The Cost of Dying). This shows that people deeply care for their loved ones, and are willing to spend large amounts of money to preserve their …show more content…
If we valued economic efficiency over the survival of people, we would not be able to research the diseases that terminal patients suffer from. One of the best reasons to keep people alive longer is that scientists can use them to help develop a cure for their diseases. We cannot just allow people to take their own lives. Doctors are obliged to place the lives of their patients above all else, as stated by the Hippocratic oath. Finally, one cannot place a value on a human being, and the care for our loved ones should be prioritized above all else. When we look back on the stories of Danny and Arlie, we can see that even in the face of hopelessness, when people come together for the common good, they can accomplish
In a cruel and unnecessary twist, Max received access to a clinical trial; Austin didn’t. As a result, Max was able to get out of his wheelchair and play on his school soccer team while Austin continued to deteriorate until he could not even feed himself (Olsen 1).
If a patient in such a condition chooses to participate in a research study, they would be able to offset the costs of intensive or end-of-life care. Furthermore, the money spent annually on healthcare adds up to approximately: “$50 billion just for doctor and hospital bills during the last two months of patients' lives” (The Cost of Dying). This shows that people deeply care for their loved ones, and are willing to spend large amounts of money to preserve their …show more content…
If we valued economic efficiency over the survival of people, we would not be able to research the diseases that terminal patients suffer from. One of the best reasons to keep people alive longer is that scientists can use them to help develop a cure for their diseases. We cannot just allow people to take their own lives. Doctors are obliged to place the lives of their patients above all else, as stated by the Hippocratic oath. Finally, one cannot place a value on a human being, and the care for our loved ones should be prioritized above all else. When we look back on the stories of Danny and Arlie, we can see that even in the face of hopelessness, when people come together for the common good, they can accomplish