Gun Possession And The Right To Bear Arms

Improved Essays
The topic of gun possession and the right to bear arms is hot topic amongst most Americans. It has been said that “guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” Some argue passionately in saying gun laws should be stricter, while others argue that they have civil rights that need to be protected. My view is somewhere in the middle. I believe there should more specific limits on gun possession, instead of a general law which excludes many Americans from their right to protect themselves. I believe the law that restricts all felons from the right to bear arms is too strict. There are more than sixteen different types of felonies. Arson, burglary, embezzlement, grand theft, illegal drug use/sales, racketeering, robbery, and tax evasion are some …show more content…
However, to say that the punishment for one bad choice in a persons’ life is that they no longer have the right to protect themselves, on top of taking away their right to vote is pretty harsh. I believe if a person goes ten years without an arrest on their record, their civil rights should be restored. If a criminal is still living a life a crime, over the course of ten years they would surely have another encounter with the police. Guns prevent an estimated 2.5 million crimes per year, often time without even firing them. To say someone no longer has the right to protect their family or themselves, to drive someone out of their home, or if someone attempts to take their personal belongings, because they made a mistake when they were younger is unjust. I’m not saying we should all have the right to go around shooting each other, but most people deserve the right to hold up a gun and say “No, I’m not going to let you do that to …show more content…
If someone has already been charged with a gun-related crime, I believe they should no longer have the right to carry one. They have effectively abused their right to bear arms, and in that case they should prohibited from possessing one. I believe if someone has documented gang affiliation they should no longer have the right to bear arms, regardless of whether or not they have been convicted of a felony. Over 90% of gang murders are committed with guns and gangs are responsible for between 50% and 90% of all violent crimes. It is going to be hard enough to guns out of the hands of gang members, since most gun as obtained illegally and often times have the serial number scratched off, the last right they need is the one that allows them to walk into a store and purchase one legally. I also believe the laws in place for automatic or assault style weapons must be much stricter than the laws in place for handguns and rifles. You are surely not going to be using a machine gun to hunt deer. The likelihood of needing an assault style weapon to protect yourself are so low, I would even argue that their sale should be limited law enforcement and military

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Six Paragraph Rough Draft

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Six Paragraph Rough Draft: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This is a section of the Second Amendment. It simply states that people have the right to protect themselves. If you were ever in a situation that was life threatening, wouldn’t you want a form of protection?…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fundamental rights are granted through the Constitution of the United States, and are a part of our liberty and freedom. Also, The Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. In other words the right to bear arms should not be taken away from anyone. Opponents of gun control consider the right to bear arms in some sense a fundamental right, and having those rights taken away is unconstitutional. Although the Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, it doesn’t protect against felons possessing a firearm.…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the founding fathers of the United States wrote the Constitution, they added the Bill of Rights which is a set of the first the ten amendments of to the Constitution. The second of these amendments, states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (U.S Const. Amend II). Particularly, this amendment is interpreted in many ways; some pro gun-control groups say only militias are allowed to bear arms, and pro gun groups say that every citizen is allowed to bear arms.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What being an American means to me is having that second amendment right to bear arms. Why does this amendment represent American to me? Because some other countries don't allow citizens to have guns or they have many gun regulations. I also like that we can carry guns on us with a CCW (concealed carry weapons) and you can do it legally. I am anticipating that the government will try to put more regulations on gun usage but they shouldn't.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These studies that mental illness is also a reason to mass shootings, and that psychiatric diagnoses can predict gun crimes before they are even committed. Gun laws must be heavily reorganized, and in regards to the Second Amendment there must be changes while keeping the modern world in context. The regulation of firearms is a tough subject to push, as there is a community that exists in America that firmly believes in the right to bear arms, which delays any political progress happening on the issue. Mental illness in America has a bad wrap, it is treated as a personal flaw rather than a disease, and an average human may not seek treatment because there is a stigma behind mental illness, and there is a lot of risk to accepting the fact that…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Constitution states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " The meaning of this is that all U.S citizens have the right to own a gun and use it in any situation needed, and when it says “Shall not be Infringed” it means to Actively break terms of a Law or Agreement. A gun's purpose in mostly to protect and defend people. I am for the second amendment that is my point of view.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should a citizen's right to bear arms be determined by the state or their ability to own and operate a firearm? One of the lead problems in American society is the controversy based on the right to bear arms. With the rapid increasing number of college and high school shootings, the topic of gun control has been an up and coming debate about who should legally be allowed to own and carry a loaded weapon. Lily Raff states "There's a whole spectrum of gun owners". Gun control at the state level is not effective because current laws continue to allow the United States to have the highest homicide-by-firearm rate among the world’s developed nations, current gun laws are easily circumvented, and the second amendment doesn’t guarantee the right for…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Control in the United States Daniel Kussow DeLaSalle High School Gun Control in the United States Crime and guns seem to always be paired together with one another. But are the two really that closely associated with each other? Does owning firearms really lead to crime?…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Research Paper

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An incendiary debate has been sparked regarding current gun control legislation in the United States, because approximately 30,000 United States citizens lose their lives to gun-related crime and injury every year (Terror). The question is whether gun control laws should be strengthened to make it harder for potential criminals to possess weapons or kept the same to preserve the rights of the United States citizens. Gun control opponents believe that the answer to this problem is to loosen gun control laws to dissuade potential shooters. Gun control proponents believe that the answer is to tighten gun control laws so that a gun is never put into a potential shooter’s hands. To examine this issue, one must carefully ponder different points of…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Amendment did you choose for your topic? Include the number and the text. The 2nd Amendment, The Right to Bear Arms MLA citation for the Bill of Rights (official government site): "The Bill of Rights: A Transcription." National Archives and Records Administration.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some opponents of tougher gun control legislation say that criminal activity is very likely to occur when there is no force of protection present between a criminal and a defenseless target. Criminals will prefer to commit their diabolical acts in highly populated “gun free” zones, where citizens are not armed and are subjected to the villain’s will. According to John Lott Jr., former chief economist for the U.S. Sentencing Commission, every mass shooting since 1977, other than the 2011 Tucson killings, has occurred in a gun-free zone. Whether these predators like to pounce upon their easily accessible, unarmed prey, or think that they are more likely to be stopped in areas where people are allowed to carry concealed weapons, they still are taking advantage of the gun control laws (Taylor). Opponents say that the solution to this problem is to allow citizens to carry concealed weapons.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Right to Bear Arms The argument that “outlawing guns will leave only criminals with guns”, has been debated over and over throughout the years without a truly clear answer being reached. As tragedies such as school shootings in Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and more recently Florida become more and more common place, gun control laws have become the focal point of national concern, and call for more gun control laws has gotten louder and louder. The Constitution grants American’s the right to bear arms, but over the years these rights have become infringed upon as new laws are passed in response to specific acts and the call for new safety measures. Guns rights are a constitutional privilege that should not be regulated for unnecessary reasons…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Violence Solution

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Violence in the United States has become one of the largest topics of debate as of recent. Murder has become much too common, and the rate of this crime is only increasing. The solution to violence, more specifically gun violence, is a large point of discussion in the current presidential race. Citizens and politicians alike have very different viewpoints on how this issue should be dealt with, and this disagreement is causing a hindrance to actually solving the problem at hand.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent years, a lot of debate had been going on about the laws pertaining to firearms. Unfortunately, with all of the mass shootings and killings being reported by the media, guns are given a bad reputation. Sadly, many people believe that they should be illegal because they are dangerous and can kill people, but what these people don’t realize is making them illegal will do a lot more harm than good. Guns have created a balance in society and if we were to take them away it could cause a lot of chaos which would result in more crime and more casualties. People deserve the right to bear arms because with proper training one could possibly save his/her life and also protect others.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics