Juror 11, an immigrant with an admiration for the U.S. government, brought up the importance of the discussion at hand; to decide a boy’s fate. He stated, during one of the many group arguments, that group conflicts shouldn’t occur as all members of the group had the responsibility to make a well thought out and critical decision that wasn’t motivated by personal reasons. His attempts to bring order in the group interactions helped to remind the members of the importance of the task presented to them and of their capability to get along with one
Juror 11, an immigrant with an admiration for the U.S. government, brought up the importance of the discussion at hand; to decide a boy’s fate. He stated, during one of the many group arguments, that group conflicts shouldn’t occur as all members of the group had the responsibility to make a well thought out and critical decision that wasn’t motivated by personal reasons. His attempts to bring order in the group interactions helped to remind the members of the importance of the task presented to them and of their capability to get along with one