12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis

Improved Essays
Register to read the introduction… A few examples would be with juror 7- voted guilty because he had a baseball game to get to, and after a long while of arguing juror 8 decided that if no one else votes not guilty then he would vote guilty and that would be the concluding verdict.
The first alliance is at the beginning after everyone but juror 8 voted guilty. Juror 9 steps in and gives him a chance to explain why he doesn't find the boy guilty. This juror didn't get offended or ignorant to what juror 8 had to say. As the day goes by, jurors 3,7 and 10 make an alliance that would eventually change as more and more thoughts are said.
During their whole dispute, they come up with different ways to settle arguments, including going around the table and giving each person a chance to explain why they voted guilty or innocent and using evidence to prove one's point. Juror 8 always had evidence to back up his reasons, which convinced the others that maybe the boy is innocent.
The ultimate resolution comes after everyone gives their input and puts all of the pieces together. They gain a different perspective which changes their thoughts on everything. After a long day, they
…show more content…
At the beginning he took charge in organizing and starting the discussion, and kept stuff in control and running. He didn't shout or disrupt, instead he waited his turn to speak and did so in a civil manner. Another instance of a leader was juror 8. Even when everyone was against his decision and was yelling at him, he didn't give in as he was confident in his reasons why the boy was not guilty. He did not switch sides during the whole debate and could prove his point through numerous examples and scenarios. Juror 3 is another example of a leader because he had strong beliefs in why he thought that the boy was guilty and stayed with his decision up until the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    There are tons of indispensable qualities of being a leader with a lot of people. People demonstrate these qualities by helping others in harsh conditions and starting a movement that will help change things to become better. People such as Frederick Douglass and Harriet Tubman have both played a role against slavery in society. Harriet Tubman was a strong leader who did not give up to accomplish a goal. In Harriet Tubman: Conductor on the Underground Railroad it states “Harriet had found it hard to leave the warmth and friendliness, too.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the two texts ‘On the Waterfront’ and ‘Twelve Angry Men’, the protagonists face conflicts through standing up for what is right and standing alone by telling others what is right. In ‘On the Waterfront’, Terry Malloy faces the conflict of whether to or not to testify against Johnny Friendly. Terry has an inner conflict with Edie when he isn’t sure if he should stay ‘Deaf & Dumb’ or testify. Father Barry and Edie continually challenge Terry which then gives him the courage to testify against Friendly. Elia Kazan, the director of this text, shows that triumph can only be achieved when one overcomes its self-interest.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reginald Rose uses the words of juror five to to teach his readers that staying silent can let you consider all sides of a situation, and that if you can be brave and change it ultimately can help you make a correct decision. Preview: In TAM Juror 5 shows his change in apprehensiveness to standing up for his opinion throughout the play. First, when he talks about his personal life very briefly. Second, when he changes his vote…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the beginning, he was disrespectful and ignorant towards the boy and his fellow jurors. His attitude deteriorates when the other jurors begin to change their votes. His “readiness” level would be at a R1 (unable and unwilling or insecure) as he was the juror to change his vote. Even when the jury questions the woman’s eyesight, Juror #3 attempts a last ditch effort to defend his position and ultimately fails. What is the “leader” expectation of each of these jurors?…

    • 1362 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This can be seen when Juror #7 states, “ Let’s vote now. Who knows, maybe we can all go…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He is a leader which has ability to influence others person decision. He decision style is combination of directive and analytical. Juror 8 has forms alliance with juror 9, juror 11 and juror 2 which have ambiguous roles. His logical thinking and good team player able to guide the deliberations which other jurors agree with him. Establish good relationship and form a trust with jurors are one of the tactic of Juror 8 which able to change the results of the vote.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight appealed to the jury’s values. He told a story about the innocent boy (innocent when he was young) being harmed as he was growing up. The boy was beaten by his dad when he was young. Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juxtaposing, Juror 3 shows courage in the play 12 Angry Men when one by one the other jurors are swayed to vote innocent. He stands by his verdict and strongly defends himself. Even though he was unconsciously judges the defendant based on prior experiences with children, he still stands firm in his decision that the boy…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Society is remarkably quick to judge a situation without thoroughly investigating it. During the movie 12 Angry Men, the old saying that you cannot judge a book by its cover, truly comes to life. This movie shows and explains the process that the jury on each case go through. It shows how each juror goes through the process of determining whether the defendant is guilty or not. Throughout the duration of this paper, you will be provided definitions and examples of three ways that this movie relates to Communications 1010.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Roles] Each person has a role to play in society, whether it be a small role or a big role. One can look at roles as a drama script for actors. In the Twelve Angry Men movie, each jury men had their own roles to play during the decision-making process, depending on their personality. Starting from the first jury man, the foreman plays an active role in guiding the whole jury group towards making a decision. He leads all the jury men through the discussion with guidance without any biases.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Except for juror number eight, peer pressure impaired their judgment. Based on his maturity level it indicated that the greatest differences are found in juror number eight and three. Once juror (Jack) changed his vote from guilty to not guilty only because the rest of them eventually voted not guilty also. It showed many times that the several jurors changed their minds from not guilty to guilty and vice versa under peer pressure, and overpowering of the strong willed ones.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Juror eight has very good observation skills. He almost is a detective juror, he seeks answers and he is good at creating scenarios to find answers. Juror eight gave his reason why he had doubt still, and why the other eleven should look the case over more. Juror eight then wanted to take another vote. He agreed that after his points, if no one else votes none-guilty that he will agree with a guilty verdict also.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The leadership during this deliberation is an important role because thanks to juror #1, many times the order was stablished and also to juror #8 the facts were examined. It is important to take this group decision process as a serious things because it can be applied in our daily life, but in this case it was to save somebody’s…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the facilitator called for a vote once they reached their discussion goal. The vote resulted in more jurors changing their mind. The facilitator established a pattern that worked for the group. They would have a group discussion, playout a scenario, discuss the scenario, and then vote. This process proved to be very productive.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not ready to accept change or reality at the first go. He was last one to accept not guilty. Jury 8: He has courage to go against the 11 jury members to stand in what he believe. He was compassionate and curious standing against all the odds and engaging the group courageously. He created a constructive dissonance that lead to extracting some finer details.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays