Substance Dualism: Identity Of The Mind And Body

Superior Essays
Jordan Mashal
Professor Landers
PHI 344
24 Septemeber 2017
Dualism
Prompt 1:
The central claim of substance dualism relies on the non identity of the mind and the body. Gotfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, a German philosopher, articulated a law that defines the notion of identity as: for any x and y, if x is identical to y, then x and y have all the same properties. Further, any two things that have all and only the same properties as one another are identical to each other. Finally, if there is some property that one of two things has that the other does not have, the two cannot be identical. Substance dualism uses Leibniz’ law in an attempt to prove the fact that the mind and body do not have the same properties, and therefore are not identical.
At the core of substance dualism is the non identity of the mind and body. Rene Descartes, a French philosopher, questioned how the immaterial mind could influence the material body. This became known as the mind-body problem in philosophy. Descartes felt that the mind was radically different than physical bodies. He held that minds were essentially thinking things that do not take up physical space. On the other hand, he argued that physical bodies were essentially unthinking things because they take up space. Substance dualism holds that the mind is formed of a
…show more content…
Gotfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, a German philosopher, articulated a law that defines the notion of identity as: for any x and y, if x is identical to y, then x and y have all the same properties. Further, any two things that have all and only the same properties as one another are identical to each other. Finally, if there is some property that one of two things has that the other does not have, the two cannot be identical. Substance dualism uses Leibniz’ law in an attempt to prove the fact that the mind and body do not have the same properties, and therefore are not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Descartes could delude, or comfort, himself with the Mind-Body dualism. Fortunately, or unfortunately, I cannot. My brain is, therefore I am. In fact, I am what my brain is. Any changes to my brain will change my identity.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I fully agree with Descartes’s concept of dualism. The mind is a lot more than chemical reactions going on in the brain. Thoughts, feelings, desire are all properties of the mind but not its parts. I…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper, I will define and describe the mind body problem, defend the position of property dualism, support my claim through the problem of personal identity and the problem of interaction, and provide one refute using epiphenomenalism. The mind-body problem the question of how our consciousness is created through the interaction of mental and brain states. The best way to describe the interaction between mental and brain states is through property dualism. A supporting argument for property dualism is through the problem of personal identity. Through the problem of interacting, property dualism is further strengthened as an accurate way to describe the mind-body problem.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance dualism is the ontological view that there exists two sorts of substances; mental and physical (material and immaterial). The existence of the substances are fundamentally distinct and exist independently of each other. If the soul can survive the death of the body, then there is the possibility of an after-life. Plato and Descartes are notorious for substance dualism which is also known as mind-body dualism, the believe that the soul is able to live on without the presence of the physical substance, the body. In this essay I will describe and assess the argument of substance dualism postulated by Rene Descartes (1596-1650).…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism vs Materialism The mind/body problem, the question of what is the relationship between the mind and the body, is commonly seen as a key issue in the philosophy of the mind (Sober, 2013, p. 204). The two categories of views discussed in Sober’s ‘Core Questions in Philosophy’ that attempt to resolve the mind/body problem are dualism and materialism. Dualism is the theory that the mind and the brain are two fundamentally different substances (Sober, 2013, p. 204). Conversely, materialism says that matter is the one and only fundamental substance in nature, and the notion that mental phenomena are a result of physical interactions follows (Sober, 2013, p. 204).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I argue that substance dualism is true. Substance dualism claims that people and bodies are distinct. People, such as you and I, are nonphysical beings. We are connected human bodies, but we are not bodies. The reason is that (1) If we can exist without bodies, then we cannot be bodies.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Christopher Kettyle Professor Kaspar Philosophy 3000 24 October 2016 Chisholm v Locke Identity Roderick Chisholm's theory and John Locke's theory on identity consists on what their fundamental belief is about identity, while giving examples supporting this idea. Multiple philosophers have explanations about identity but by comparing Chisholm's and Locke's theory you will get a better idea about this metaphysical problem. By doing a comparison this will show you the ideas of these philosophers.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In philosophy, a theory that includes the viewing of the the mind and body as being separate kinds of substances or natures is known as mind- body dualism. This stance implies that the mind and body not only differ in meaning but refer to different kinds of entities. Thus, a person that proposes the concept of dualism would oppose any theory that identifies mind with the brain, conceived as a physical operant. Descartes reaches this conclusion by arguing that the nature of the mind is completely and utterly distinct from that of the body, and therefore it is possible for one to exist without the other. This argument gives rise to the famous problem of mind-body causal interaction that are still commonly debated today: how can the mind cause…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Compare and contrast the views of John Searle and Rene Descartes on dualism.is composed of two substances: mind and body. One is physical and one is non-phyical. Rene Descartes views on dualism are known as substance and simple dualism. He believed that reality was composed of two substances, one being the mind which consists of inmaterial thing such as thoughts and emotions.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These types of arguments for substance dualism are called Leibniz law arguments. By itself, Leibniz’s law is a principle of logic. The law states that if two things, “X” and “Y,” are identical, then they have all properties in common. Now we apply Leibniz’s law to the mind and the body. Leibniz’s law informs us that bodies and minds are the same thing if and only if they share all properties in common.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In what follows, I will compare the two arguments and their connections to functionalism and empiricism. I will argue that Descartes’ substance theory is more plausible than Berkeley’s bundle theory because common sense tells us that we can perceive mind-independent objects, which counters with his theory. Descartes’ substance theory states that all sensible objects are made of a substance distinct from its properties. A substance, how Descartes defines it, is any entity that can exist on its own. The…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Substance Dualism is a theory of mind that asserts the thesis that there exists the mind (nonphysical) and the body (physical) and that they are two distinct substances. Moreover, it identifies a being immediately with their mind and only secondarily with their body. Logical Behaviorism is branch of philosophical behaviorism. Behaviorism, essentially, is the thesis that mental states, if they exist, are identical to behavioral states. Logical Behaviorism posits that descriptions of mental states are reducible to descriptions of behavioral states.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In contrast, dualist theorists, such as Plato and Descartes, hold that man is composed of two utterly distinct substances. In dualism, the mind and the body are not only different but they exist separately of each other. They are “as different and distinct as the…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Philosophy 001 Project 3: Descartes 1) Cartesian dualism refers to the philosophical view proposed by the French mathematician and philosopher Rene Descartes that describes and explains the relationship of the mind and body. According to this philosophical view, the Mind and the Body are two completely separate and different substances capable of interacting with one another. Descartes asserted that “[that is, [the] mind, by which I am what I am], is entirely and truly distinct from [the] body, and may exist without it.” (Descartes). Descartes described the mind as an immaterial substance whose “essence consists only in being a thinking thing [or a substance whose whole essence or nature is merely thinking]” (Descartes).…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays