Logical Behaviorism And Dualism In The Philosophy Of Mind

Better Essays
Substance Dualism is a theory of mind that asserts the thesis that there exists the mind (nonphysical) and the body (physical) and that they are two distinct substances. Moreover, it identifies a being immediately with their mind and only secondarily with their body. Logical Behaviorism is branch of philosophical behaviorism. Behaviorism, essentially, is the thesis that mental states, if they exist, are identical to behavioral states. Logical Behaviorism posits that descriptions of mental states are reducible to descriptions of behavioral states. So for example, to say someone is in pain is to say they are exhibiting the behaviors usually associated with pain. Further, it posits that all that one needs to know about mental states can be observed through …show more content…
The problem of other minds and the mind body problem. Dualism has traditionally struggled to account for how an immaterial substance can interact with a material one. Behaviorism on the other hand is a physicalist theory and implicit in it is the idea that the mind arises out of the material physical world. What dualism fails to account for, Behaviorism solves simply by ascribing to a view of the purely material. The other is the problem of other minds- the objection to Dualism based on the undesired conclusion that if all we can be sure of is our own bodies, we can never know for certain that others even really exist. Dualism still struggles with this. However, Behaviorism dissolves this problem because again, in virtue of its physicalist foundation, it implicitly assumes a consistency among other humans that Substance dualism doubted. Because of this, minds are physically the same and only experientially different and so can be assumed to operate similarly to one another. Because of the physicalism of Behaviorism, it is able to dissolve two long existing problems of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Reductive materialism does not accept independence of the mental. Thus it is an arch-rival of emergentism, still it accepts mental causation. On this view the mental is identical with some physical states, some brain states in particular, and they can act as a cause bringing about changes in the physical realm. One of the virtues of reductive materialism is that mental causation poses no challenge to it. Since a mental state is ‘reducible’ to a physical state, mental causation turns out to be physical to physical causation for the reductive materialist.…

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Theories Of Dualism

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages

    However, other emergentists, such as Thomas Henry Huxley, refused this idea and argued that even though the physical events in the brain trigger mental events, mental events do not have the ability or capacity to impact any kind of physical events, including behaviors (1874). This form of emergentism is called epiphenomenalism. More interestingly, Baruch Spinoza proposed a related dualist theory, which is known as double aspectism. According to Spinoza, the mind and body are similar to two sides of the same coin that they are different but inseparable from each other. He believed that physical events happening to the material body can be experienced as emotions and thoughts, and mental events also impact the material body.…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cartesian Dualism is unable to account for how the mind is divisible should it be an immaterial substance. Whereas the mind being divisible gives very strong evidence to Mind-Brain Identity theory, as it seems to indicate that physical processes on the brain affect the mind pointing to the mind being physical and at least, within or apart of the mind. Despite this, one could not take the research far enough to state that the mind is the same as the brain, but at least is ontologically reducible to the…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, Just because Descartes is able to think of his mind having life without his body, this doesn’t actually mean that his mind can really exist without his body. Maybe more research will show that there is some metaphysical connection between his mind and body that would make this impossible that Descartes doesn’t know about. Nevertheless, There are two complications facing Descartes’ arguments against mind- body dualism. The first relates to claims about whether one particular thing is or is not the same thing as another, or whether they are different. A second difficulty goes with this one hand and hand.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The mind and body are entities whose characteristics are strictly exclusive, yet together, they form a relationship that is the basis of the existence of humankind – and, by consequence, is one of the most classic and debated dualisms in philosophy. This dualism is described as the mind-body problem. The mind indicates one’s mental faculties such as thoughts, emotions and sensations, while the body indicates the physical processes and entities that allow one to function physically. While both are essential to human existence, the nature of this relationship is heavily debated. The Philosopher René Descartes proposed thoughts on the mind-body concept that support physicalism, the belief that everything can be reduced to physical states: the concepts with which Gilbert Ryle famously refuted and disproved with his “category-mistake” theory.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Liars may find more difficulty in their day to day lives, but for the most part I can’t imagine any serious repercussions. What is unsettling for me is that this world’s “mentality” is entirely physical, and I believe mentality, at least on some level, must be independent from the…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Because it becomes impossible for the individual or anyone, to distinguish between, whose memories are theirs, what is true and what is not, we are left with our problem. A response to this is that genuine memory must cause the memory in the right way. Meaning that, for someone’s memory to be considered a genuine memory, the memory must be caused by the original…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Since the organ in this case became the receiver of all other things, it should distinguish across the matters, but restricted by the form of organ, the matters of organ is unable to recognize the circumstance other than itself. The generic and specific difference cannot be evaluated because the one form would allow only access to some particular matter. This exclusion violated the rational faculty’s property of having infinite access to all. Therefore, this possibility is rejected. The possibility that the rational faculty’s knowledge of its organ came from some other intelligible form differed from the form of organ is also refuted.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Punishment could serve as the cause for stopping future crimes. Despite this logical defense, the absence of accountability is still disturbing. On the other hand, libertarianism too has unsettling flaws. Libertarians make the extreme claim that science is limited to non-humans, because we have souls and they are a non-physical source of change in the world. I believe that the soul and body are not distinct entities since there is no sufficient evidence and no observations to prove or…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    These types of arguments for substance dualism are called Leibniz law arguments. By itself, Leibniz’s law is a principle of logic. The law states that if two things, “X” and “Y,” are identical, then they have all properties in common. Now we apply Leibniz’s law to the mind and the body. Leibniz’s law informs us that bodies and minds are the same thing if and only if they share all properties in common.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays