Globalization is not contemporary it …show more content…
In 1975 advertising gained scholarly attention, since two decades ago, globalization has dramatically improved the advertisement industry. The lecturer also determines the semiotic strategies behind non-profit ads to influence the consumers. “Do the poor really smile this much?” she asks in the #GlobalPOV project. The semiotic influence behind the propaganda is innumerable. It makes you feel empowered. It’s only one click and you will be saving the world from catastrophe. She stipulates that it’s a very arrogant idea. We are forgetting the fact that our consumerism creates poverty. Be that as it may, we still like this …show more content…
The First World countries competing in an ever-growing and aggressive economy with the other countries in the world cause this phenomenon. The more the citizens of the country feel comfortable on spending more money for a bigger home and a nicer car, the more those citizens will invest in the country’s economy. These investments are not property of the developed country but it funds the others that produce the goods. This unmeasured lust for wanting more and more or the so-called “American dream” has produced poverty among citizens who are not able to pay their debts.
Globalization in like manner, causes for “undeveloped countries” to explode their natural resources in order to appease the demands of other countries. This method leads towards global warming and inappropriate use of natural resources that could endanger the planet. For example, the use of the Amazon’s wood is producing a drastic deforestation. Such practice’s consequence, allows for an unstable and dissatisfying global economy. For example, oil market cost can be affected by a political situation in the producing country, which may further create wars and abnormal price