The Paris Accords: A Comparative Analysis

1276 Words 5 Pages
On a political playing field, nothing goes unnoticed and opposition will always be blocking the path of good intentions. Politicians, foreign and domestic, always have a secondary goal hidden beneath the face value of the topic and terms being discussed. This form of diplomacy and negotiations leads to years of dispute, until a resolution or a compromise is found. The world is going through a crisis of its own and political leaders around the world are working around the clock to save the nurturing Mother of life. This political quarrel caused the Paris accords to take nine years before being agreed upon by 195 countries in 2015 (Davenport). These nations will “commit nearly every country to lowering planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions to help stave off the most drastic effects …show more content…
The Parris accords displays the political battleground of varying parties and confirms the benefits and drawbacks of man’s nature at global power, which influences the Earth and the societies that inhabit it. Even though politics is a battle of words and power, it can also be a battle of the people’s support. Manmade climate change is widely believed by the American and global populace, only being opposed by the majority of the Republican party. Conservatives believe that climate change is a natural cycle of the Earth and that Global Warming is just being exaggerated. Conservatives would believe that the Paris accords is a waste of time and that there are more important issues in the world, like terrorism. In contrast, this article showcases the benefits of this climate change agreement helping the planet, proving it is liberal biased. This article will influence its readers to believe the Paris accords is beneficial to society. However, this agreement will mark a transition in global financial markets by “triggering a fundamental shift away from investment in coal, oil and gas as primary energy sources toward

Related Documents