Genetic Abortion

Improved Essays
Genetics Abortion
As I close my eyes, I try to recall the very first moment I saw light. The farthest I can dive into my memories was probably about 15 years ago when I was around four years old, trying to climb the tree in my backyard. Because of the fact that I am limited by human capabilities, I can only remember back to a certain extent. It’s almost impossible for me to remember the very first moment I was born or the time inside my mother’s womb. Even if you ask a six year old child, he or she will recall no such memories. Therefore, I present the question, “Is it rational to consider a fetus as a human being?”
The controversial topic on the morality of abortion had always contained the argument of whether the fetus has the right to life.
…show more content…
According to Purdy, it is more important to question the parents’ decision to perform the act of reproduction. Although every individual has the right to reproduce, the parents should have investigated for signs of defective genes within each other’s respective family. Had they received advanced notice that there was a history of genetic disease within either side of the family, they would have reconsidered the idea of committing the act of reproduction. Otherwise, they would have conceived a child into the world and the child will be obligated to adjust to the world’s standards despite his or her …show more content…
Individuals such as Rick Donohue stated that he has lived his life to the fullest without any regrets. The moment of happiness may have been short, but it was worth it to Donohue. Purdy even gave out a survey to college students as a hypothetical research to reveal to the public how college students perceived the subject at hand (Vaughn, 548). These college students were not handicapped or disabled, but after thinking about the issue hypothetically, the majority of the surveyed students claim that they will have lived their lives to the fullest by the time they’re in 30 to 40 years of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis argues in his article An Argument that Abortion is Wrong that abortion, except in specific rare instances is seriously wrong. He bases this claim off of the principle that killing any innocent human being is wrong. While the central point of most pro-choice individuals is that women should have the right to control their body, Marquis argues that the right of the unborn fetus outweighs the right for a woman to control her body. Before supporting his thesis Marquis lays out one of the main problems in the abortion debate. People in favor of abortion often have a very narrow view on what constitutes a person and this is problematic because it leaves out infants, severely retarded and mentally ill individuals.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lisa Genova’s Inside the O’Briens explores the impact of a genetic, neurological disease on a close-knit family. For this particular book, Genova selected to examine how Huntington’s disease can affect the relationships and lives of family members following a diagnosis. Joe O’Brien is the primary character targeted by this disease, but his family absorbs the shock via adjustments to symptoms and possible diagnosis later in life. Throughout this analysis, I will consider how Joe’s novel diagnosis impacts his family members, identify the key issues and points about Huntington’s disease, and indicate how reading this book has affected my understanding of Huntington’s disease, as well as other neurodegenerative diseases.…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jamson's Dilemma Case

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages

    1. If I had chosen for the hospital ethics committee to allow the procedure (option 1) instead of investigating further to see if conceiving a child was Mr. Jamison’s plan (option 3), Mr. Jamison’s parents would have felt not only like their son’s rights were destroyed, but also as if their future grandchild would not have developed properly in their childhood or adult life without a father. 2.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doctors of today have advanced tools and technology to look at an embryo and tell if it is healthy and ready for life. Many mothers experience complication in pregnancy that can lead to a child being born with disabilities. As stated in JUSTIFYING INFANTICIDE AND NON-VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA By Peter Singer, infants can be born with “irreversible intellectual disabilities, will never be rational, self-conscious beings.” With the knowledge of the child’s health before birth it gives a morally difficult question to answer. Should the child be born?…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. The three commonly used arguments for genetic abortion according to Kass are: social good, familial good, and natural standard. Social good argues cost effectiveness of the fetus that might not be as productive or benefit society as much as a normal able person would. As many people in history with defects have made great and positive influence to the world, this is not a well fit argument.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Finnis believes that if you are conceived from human parents, zygotes, embryos, and fetuses you are indeed human. At first you are only a few celled but will eventually develop into a baby and then a child and then an adult. He also states that personhood begins at fertilization and direct abortions procedures are intended to terminate a fetus's life. Finnis states that even the zygote is already a person and not merely a potential person.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Embryonic stem cell research. Google this term and you will find that there are as many articles on the ethics of embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) as there are on the actual biomedical field of study. The moral claims for and against the use of embryos in scientific research often deal with “personhood”. Opponents of ESCR mistakenly equate ‘human life’ and ‘personhood’. I will dive into the semantics of these terms in the following paragraph.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In her piece, Mary Anne Warren argues the permissibility of abortion by holding the moral acceptance of abortion is founded on the following argument: fetuses are not persons so therefore killing them is not killing a person hence having an abortion is morally permissible (432). To Warren, ‘human being’ is used in different contexts thinks that 'human being' is used in two different senses in both argument 1. and 2. In argument 1, 'human being' is being used in a moral connotation to mean a 'person' or 'true member of the moral community'. But it does not mean that the fetus is a person, and it is persons with rights, essentially, the right to life. (433).…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stem cell research, especially embryonic stem cell research, is a hot topic in the medical world. Each side has very good points as to why stem cell research is ethical and why it is not. Embryonic stem cell research is ethical way to treat common disorders and diseases in society today. There are two main types of stem cells: adult and embryonic.…

    • 2411 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though some philosophers think human embryos are like stem cells due to the lack of rational nature, they have the full potential and ability to have a rational nature. If human embryos don't have a rational nature neither do stem cells. If one decides to destroy a human embryo, then its potential is interrupted. Compared to stem cells, human embryos have a probability to become an adult which gives it a chance to reason and make choices for itself in the future. With this argument, human embryos have the same moral status as human children and adults because of the ability to develop during the fertilization of an egg, having the potential of becoming an adult, and lastly being able to desire protection and life by becoming more human.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grass Roots Abortion Abortion has been involved in multiple accounts of controversial arguments. It is defined in which the developing fetus is killed by the choice of the mother bearing the child. Women of the fetuses have reasons to why their decision of removing the fetus from their belly, such as the protection of Women 's Rights, the medical risk of the mother 's life, and to prevent severe disorders of the child 's life . Women 's Rights correlates to every individuals, including males. Women have the moral right to decide what to do with their own bodies, whether it is customization of any surgical procedures that involves cosmetics, or outside situations that causes the woman to be impregnated with an unwanted partner.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I will defend my argument by explaining how a fetus is a human being and that abortion deprives the fetus from having its meaningful future. Lastly, I will respond to the objections of a fetus not being a human being, speciesism, and specific cases of genetic defects in a fetus. The first and main thing I must address is the phrase “human being.” We can all agree, that a fetus is a human being in the biological sense.…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most intricate writers on the subject of abortion all believe that whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to end. The purpose of this paper isn’t to address the greater ethics of abortion such as abortion before implantation or abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy; rather I seek to address the general argument for the claim that the overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. I which to investigate further Don Marquis claim that I something is living its wrong to kill it. If this were true people that are dying from disease would believe that they loss a future and all the experiences that they would have had. The second one is that killing alone is wrong because it automatically takes away the greatest loss, which is their life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Should women have the power to end an innocent human life? The answer to that question should very obviously be no, yet that’s what women do legally every single day. In the case of Roe v. Wade that took place in 1973 a pregnant woman, a doctor, and a married couple tried to fight against the law that made abortion illegal claiming that it was unconstitutional (Roe v. Wade - Case Brief Summary).…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays