Fight Against Tyranny

Improved Essays
The Fight Against Tyranny Democracy is a form of government where political authority is in the hands of the people. A tyranny is when one person or a group of people put forth a form of cruel and oppressive government. The United States is a democratic country. This is because the U.S. has the separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism. The separation of powers prevents tyranny in the national government by separating the central government into the legislative, executive, and judicial branches so that not one person or group will have all the power. The system of checks and balances allows each branch of government to keep an eye on the other two branches to keep them in check and look at their actions. Federalism helps limit …show more content…
With checks and balances, each of the three branches has the right to limit the powers of the other two branches. By doing this, one branch does not have the opportunity to overpower the others. Basically, each branch “checks” or oversees the power of the other two branches to make sure that the power is balances among all three of them equally. Checks and balances limit government power in the U.S. because it allows all three branches to watch out over one another so one won’t become too powerful over the other two. By doing this, they equally balance the power between them. A real example of how checks and balances prevent tyranny would be how the judiciary branch checks on the executive branch (President). After the September 11 terrorist attacks, according to CollegeAmericanGovernemnt.org, “ President Bush declared that the executive branch had the power to detain “Illegal enemy combatants” indefinitely, without trial,” (Hanley, James). Following 9/11, Yaser Hamdi, who’s an American citizen, was captured in Afghanistan and was held inside a military prison. His father was completely against his son’s imprisonment. He argued that his son wasn’t a threat against the United States. Instead, Yaser was there for some charitable work. The Supreme Court then ruled that the executive branch didn’t have the right to hold a U.S. citizen indefinitely without allowing them to challenge their status as an illegal enemy combatant in the courts. Within the checks and balances, each and every branch has the right to check on and balance the power within every other branch. They each make sure that the others don’t overrule them all. With the example above, the judicial branch checked on the executive branch to conclude that the President had no right to hold a U.S. citizen indefinitely, like Hamdi’s case. The judicial branch was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    And those three are the reason to prevent the government from overpower. Without them, it will lead to chaos, and nobody makes a decision. The states end up with power and create their own country. The Supreme Court should have the power of judicial review and overturn the unconstitutional federal law because it reviews the actions of the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch to see if…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Furthermore, the distinctions between the powers is reflected in the functions must not be exercised by one person. As an example, the president cannot at the same time be a member of the national council, or a judge who is a minister. Thus, the separation of powers as seen can be fundamental in keeping the government in check. This stops there from being the same people holding power in many parts of the government, and thus abusing power. As seen separations of power is necessary to protect from abuse of power from the government, and everyday people’s rights, as well as to make sure that there is no corruption with the people in power and to make sure they are doing their…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    • Self -Government is a government of a country or a state that is ran by the people, it is a majority rules type government (Patterson, 1990). This was important in the shaping of America, because, it is about individual freedom, it keeps the government from having control over the people. • Separation of Powers is the principle that states that the legislative, judicial and executive branches of government should be divided in power, and used as a whole power (Patterson, 1990). Due to the corruptive nature of power these branches should be separate departments. This was important in the shaping of America to help prevent corruptive government.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation-of-power makes it so that no one branch has compete power and they all work independently as well as together. Each branch is check by other branch. The Judicial branch makes sure that the legislative branch does not pass laws that conflict with the constitution. The President is commander of the U.S armed…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfair, cruel ruling and no freedom, how would you like to have a government that follows these set of rules? This is what it would be like to have tyranny in the United States government. This is what it would be like without the creation of the constitution.The first guard against tyranny was federalism, which is federal, state and local government. Another protection against tyranny was separation of powers which made three main branches of government, judicial ,executive and legislative. One of the last guards against it is checks and balances which makes sure the different branches are using their power correctly and if they’re not then the others can check them for it.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Checks and balances were created to keep one branch of government from having control over another branch of government. In Document C, it says, “… the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other… (The three branches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” This means the branches of government all check each other to make sure one branch does not have more power than another. The branches can approve or disapprove with things the other branches have decided on. If one branch became over powered than it could take over the government resulting in tyranny. Also in document A, it states, “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” What this is saying is that the state government has powers that it needs to be successful, but for bigger things the federal government is there for them.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although factions generally balance out, governing bodies need checks against corruption. Checks and balances help in smoothing out the microcosm of a representative government. There are also systems in place to ensure that the voices of smaller states are not drowned out by larger states, such as the Electoral College. If a populist demagogue were to be elected president, they would be impeded from seizing unencumbered political power due to the power of the Legislative and Judicial…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Brutus Anti Federalism

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In Federalist number 10, as has been previously argued in this paper, a republican system of government is able to control any abusive government. Additionally, a republican government is able to control any abusive majority from taking advantage of the rights of the minority. Therefore, through this type of government the “public good and the rights of other citizens” is respected. As mentioned before in Federalist number 51, Madison writes that the individual rights and interest of every citizen is connected to the Constitution.Furthermore, in a republic the citizens surrender their rights to a single government. However, the division of government is a creates a “double security” of the rights of the people.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution does help against government having absolute power, mainly because issues laws that contain rights for its citizens. Separation of power, an idea brought by Montesquieu; it’s one of the common ways of making sure power was spread and governments had limited control over what goes on. “The power surrendered by the people is divided between two distinct governments… The different governments will each control each other” (Document A). By setting the…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The system prevents tyranny by allowing each of the three branches to not only have power over themselves but to have power over the other branches. In case of a branch becoming too powerful the other branches can check the power to ensure equal power between the three branches. For example, if the president (Executive Branch) were to veto a law that the Legislative Branch felt was needed they could override the president’s veto to ensure that the president doesn’t get to powerful and do away with a good law. As stated by James Madison the system of checks and balances main role is to “divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other” (James Madison Federalist Paper #51, 1788). In addition to this James Madison also quotes that the three branches “have no constitutional control over each other” (James Madison Federalist Paper #51, 1788).…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays