No; Leadership traits back before the 1940s had a lot of relevancies; by then people were much more concern about some one's traits than the real leadership procedures one would comfortably exercise upon. After then the notion of leadership did change on a huge and significance step since people expected the tangible results from their leaders but not a mere traits and words. Leadership traits have come to fade over time as the leadership trait theories focus on the leader’s values and beliefs that are accorded to any leader in power. The personality of a leader, therefore, is greatly influenced by what the leader himself or herself believes in and that the kind and ways of a leader depends on personal traits. Back before the 1940s, leaders
…show more content…
This kind of leadership keeps on changing over time as leaders and the people they lead keep on readjusting the situation.
According to me, the Fiedler’s contingency theory is more result oriented and better to practice to many leaders therein I, therefore, support it.
Idiosyncrasy is a kind of a process where an individual in question particularly a leader has a capacity to deviate acceptably from the people they lead or even the set rules. That time when these individuals go astray from their expectations that is when they are said to have gone idiosyncrasy. Idiosyncrasy credits are increased each time an individual go in line with the group's expectations, and vice versa holds the …show more content…
In making his speeches but the implementation failed him terribly. He had a charismatic kind of leadership, and this had to be seen.
A good example of such person is the who was more charismatic is Napoleon Bonaparte who once demanded gold and silver from those he conquered, then he passed it out to his soldiers as thanks, ensuring their loyalty.
A god example is the Winston Churchill and Bill Clinton. These individuals really exercised one kind of leadership to be admired by many and hence still found in our memories today.
I would love to talk much about the President, who had to show good leadership even if in times of war or terror. He was so effective since he heard the people and also practiced their will upon what difficult times arises. The real name is Peter Capell. In the Paths of Glory Movie.
To be honest enough here, Ethical Leadership can’t survive in this environment of bureaucratic systems. One of the best reason is that in ethical leadership, people expect fairness, trust, honesty, consideration and charisma. This listed elements cannot be exercised by the bureaucratic environment since people are used to legal voices of commands and rules to follow all the
This kind of leadership keeps on changing over time as leaders and the people they lead keep on readjusting the situation.
According to me, the Fiedler’s contingency theory is more result oriented and better to practice to many leaders therein I, therefore, support it.
Idiosyncrasy is a kind of a process where an individual in question particularly a leader has a capacity to deviate acceptably from the people they lead or even the set rules. That time when these individuals go astray from their expectations that is when they are said to have gone idiosyncrasy. Idiosyncrasy credits are increased each time an individual go in line with the group's expectations, and vice versa holds the …show more content…
In making his speeches but the implementation failed him terribly. He had a charismatic kind of leadership, and this had to be seen.
A good example of such person is the who was more charismatic is Napoleon Bonaparte who once demanded gold and silver from those he conquered, then he passed it out to his soldiers as thanks, ensuring their loyalty.
A god example is the Winston Churchill and Bill Clinton. These individuals really exercised one kind of leadership to be admired by many and hence still found in our memories today.
I would love to talk much about the President, who had to show good leadership even if in times of war or terror. He was so effective since he heard the people and also practiced their will upon what difficult times arises. The real name is Peter Capell. In the Paths of Glory Movie.
To be honest enough here, Ethical Leadership can’t survive in this environment of bureaucratic systems. One of the best reason is that in ethical leadership, people expect fairness, trust, honesty, consideration and charisma. This listed elements cannot be exercised by the bureaucratic environment since people are used to legal voices of commands and rules to follow all the