Faculty Student Disciplinary Committee

Decent Essays
The purpose of a Jury is to seek justice, not only for the potential victim of a trial, but also for the Court and all of the citizens who fills the courtroom. But seeking justice depends entirely on the quality of the jurors who serves and their willingness to partake in such actions faithfully. Jurors have an obligation to perform this service sincerely and with integrity. As part of the Faculty-Student Disciplinary Committee, I will fulfill my obligation to my peers . I will be attentive, unbiased and represent the qualities of an exceptional member of the Faculty-Student Disciplinary Committee. I will also try to enforce these ways upon the many other possible members.
As part of the Faculty-Student Disciplinary Committee, I want

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A Professor of Law at George Mason University wrote an article about the jury nullification in the Washington Post. In it he focuses of various aspects that make this process so interesting and contradicting. The author give his personal view on jury nullification and his initial attitude toward it. Jury nullification can be seen as a two edged sword, because it is not applied on constant and consistent basis. The author, Ilya Somin agrees that it can curb unjust laws, however it can backfire.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We all have the privilege to be attempted by our associates, and it is a thoughtful approach to include the group in regulating equity. There are circumstances in which the law is unjust, and it is the duty of a member of the jury to speak to the supposition of the general population. Serving as a Jury was a reasonable way for me to maintain an individual liberty and just to watch out for the government: making sure it doesn 't push unjust laws on fellow citizens. These reasons drove me to participate in the American University mock trial that was held at the Montgomery County judicial center in Rockville.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Essay

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juries The jury system has been a part of our society for hundreds of years. It was first created to give all defendants that option to be judged by their peers for their charges instead of by solely a judge. This provides an excellent opportunity to those who feel that their peers can give them a verdict that is not decided by the professional judge.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We are told that laws are here to protect us and the common good, but what if certain laws harm us? Slavery was considered a constitutional right and was upheld many times in court even thought massive amounts of Northern disagreed with the laws. And rightfully so! Should they have respected these laws that made people property? I hope not.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury 9: He is an old man and experienced. He observes and interprets in a rational way. He was bold enough to support Jury#8. • Now step back and focus on the systemic level: What clue does their personal history (occupation, nationality, socio-economic status, family circumstances, or educational background) provide about the societal faction each juror…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Jury Duty

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Of the 318.9 million people that roam the streets in the United States about 32 million of them get summoned for jury duty each year. Of these 32 million very few know facts and have a basic knowledge about the jury process and what it entails. Theses Americans are trusted to decide a person's fate but don’t have any knowledge as to what is right and wrong. The current jury process is taking away from the validity of our jury system. How juries are chosen and what they execute while on trial doesn’t always benefit the person being tried.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jurors, probably the most important aspect of the criminal justice system, in itself. The American justice system, is built on the idea that justice is blind, therefore, justice is fair, however, it is the jury that ensures that fairness, with that said, it is understandable how one’s bias can compromise the criminal justice system. Therefore, jurors are faced with their own personal bias, moreover, they struggle with their decisions due to personal beliefs, some of which may not be ethical. It is clear, that the adversarial, or adversary system, allows for the most transparent and fair process that exist on this planet, just ask the People’s Republic of…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose one of the jurors really played a very important role in the play. This juror is juror 3 and he played a very notable and important role in the play because he never gave up his points, he made some surprising choices, and played a big part in the other characters actions. First, off juror 3 is very persistent and always want to get their point across. An example of this is when he says,“Look you can forget all that other stuff. He still came home to dig out the knife and get rid of it.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I’m juror #11. I’m a refugee from Europe. I went through a lot of injustice so basically I’m looking for be on quest of justice to help other people who have been treated unfairly. The purpose of me writing this letter is to inform that all the jurors decided “not guilty” because it is a hung jury. We end up not having a right verdict to make up a better decision.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The leadership during this deliberation is an important role because thanks to juror #1, many times the order was stablished and also to juror #8 the facts were examined. It is important to take this group decision process as a serious things because it can be applied in our daily life, but in this case it was to save somebody’s…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The importance given to their personal values and life experiences, in fact, played a crucial role in determining how fair, and conflicting the outcome of ethical decision making was, as initially, they were not giving the boy a chance to a fair trial. The juror’s job was to compare facts, look at the evidence discussing among themselves. By considering only the most obvious aspects in order to make a certain decision is never an ideal outcome or fair for the accused. Some jurors, especially number three was judging about the boy by comparing their circumstances with their own circumstances. They were especially looking for every negative circumstance to conclude the…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    R. V. Williams Case Study

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the Parliament, jurors are often seen as unable to set aside their prejudices and act partially, which led the court to reject the argument that prejudice based on pre-trial publicity can be cured by the safeguards in the trial process in Sheratt (R. v. Williams, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128. 31. Supreme Court. 04 June 1998. Print).…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Developed trustworthiness between jurors is an ice-breaker encourage to discuss the case fairly and without prejudging the…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays