Essay On Jury Duty

Improved Essays
Of the 318.9 million people that roam the streets in the United States about 32 million of them get summoned for jury duty each year. Of these 32 million very few know facts and have a basic knowledge about the jury process and what it entails. Theses Americans are trusted to decide a person's fate but don’t have any knowledge as to what is right and wrong. The current jury process is taking away from the validity of our jury system. How juries are chosen and what they execute while on trial doesn’t always benefit the person being tried.
All throughout the country there are juries that follow the same process to convict a person of a crime, but the process is question if it is reliable and benefitting the society. The process is the same for
…show more content…
The OJ Simpson trial was one of the most talked about and most controversial trials to happen in the last decade because of the jury's decision. The OJ trial lasted from November through January in which time the 12 person trial containing “ten women and two men” listened to attorney after attorney and being separated from their families. The jury was heavily populated by women because in their opinion it was the best option for the case because The outcome of this trial lead to uprising all over the country that left the president to calm all of the people. The media had took this trial and made it one of the biggest things to happen, but for all the time that was up into it the debate for the judgment wasn’t very long. “Nine month trial in the new spotlight took just six hours to clear Simpson of murder” So wouldn’t this show that the jury was feed up with amount of time they spend on this case and were able to come to such a short conclusion in just six hours after hearing testimony for nine months doesn’t seem acceptable. The OJ Simpson trial sparked the biggest controversy on a jury decision in the last

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The reality of OJ Simpson’s Trial Present to Mr. Hyatt Presented by Aiyana Barnes O.J. Simpson was convicted of murdering his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson. There are three crucial factors with the evidence against him. First, the L.A.P.D. has been proven corrupt and racially biased. Second, the evidence, including blood samples, and the glove from the scene of the crime. Third, the juries from during the trial were all mainly African American, so they began to have a race issue.…

    • 2536 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Oj Simpson Guilty

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The most televised trial in recorded history was a murder trial where a famous NFL football player was accused of murder. The O.J. Simpson murder trial was controversial because of numerous reasons. He pled not guilty to the murder of his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. The evidence and the time leading up to his arrest would make anyone believe that he was guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt, but the jury in 1995 found him not guilty. I believe that there is overwhelming evidence against O.J. Simpson, and he should have been found guilty for two murders.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Simpson trial is a historical case some may say, while other may say this case gave the Caucasian community a taste of their own medicine. It shows how the criminal justice system is not made to service justice all the time something that those in the minority community are use to. Mr. Simpson was able to build new bridges into the entertainment world for minority individuals, break racial barriers in a way, but eventually fell and left nation in the way that it was already built on. Which is the division between racial groups, feeling as if one race is superior to another and oppression another racial group. Being Black/ African American in a Caucasian dominated world, you will always be labeled as guilty even though you may actually be not guilty.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The racial tensions in LA made many people believe the police were out to get black people, this damaged the jury’s ability to listen to evidence in a fair and open minded way. OJ’s flamboyant and fun personality also clouded the Jury’s ability to analyze evidence fairly. I believe there were too many problems going on at the same time that caused the trial to get out of hand including the way that the Judge handled the media. Each one of these things which should not have affected the Jurys decision if they followed the law and the Jurys instructions, but in a trail anything can happen with a Jury. It was the overwhelming amount of evidence and events that makes me believe there is sufficient evidence to believe he has committed the…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oj Simpson Fast Facts

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Following less than five hours of discussion on October 2, 1995, the jury returned to the courtroom the next morning to announce that they found the defendant not guilty of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Members of the jury felt that because the gloves did not fit on the Juice’s hands, he could not have been guilty of killing Nicole and Ron (“O.J. Simpson Fast Facts”). The prosecution felt defeated, while the defense rejoiced. The Brown and Goldman families were outraged, the Simpson family felt relief. The trial was over, but the fight would never end.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The power of juries has proven to play a large factor in wrongful convictions, although the jury selection process is meant to select people who won’t nullify or wrongfully convict it still…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Silvia Mazzula's Jury Bias

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the article, Jury Bias: Can You Argue the Facts When Race Enters the Mix, the author Silvia L. Mazzula tells us the truth that sometimes decisions from jurors are based on more than just facts. They are likely to be influenced by race, even though they don’t really notice that. The author firstly puts forward some public’s controversy about this kind of unfairness. The whole article is based on a study, in this study, we can see the jury bias does exist. Since we notice that situation, we need to try our best to improve racism through effective ways.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The key topic that is under debate throughout this paper is jury nullification and how its procedures work within the justice system, as well as some of its strengths and weaknesses. There is quite a bit of controversy surrounding jury nullification being used as a primary rectification in the justice system as it tends to make equal outcomes become unequal outcomes. Jury nullification is a process in which a jury reaches a verdict of not guilty despite the fact that the defendant is actually guilty of the actions he or she is being charged for. The jury nullifies a law that is believed to be immorally wrong or wrongfully applied to the defendant.…

    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification Essay

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The topic of jury nullification has long incited debate, with strong opinions on both sides. Paul Butler a former Special Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Columbia, claims jury nullification is necessary in order to fight laws that are racially unjust and argues that African-American jurors should exercise their right of nullification and it is their moral responsibility to emancipate some guilty black outlaws (Butler, 1995, p. 679). Jury nullification, occurs when jurors deliberately vote to acquit a defendant, regardless of evidence presented to establish the defendant’s guilt (Spohn, 2009, p. 68). It is a mechanism employed by prosecutors to encourage jurors to disregard the law and evidence and acquit defendants (Horowitz,…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I can tell you this, T.V. and movies make courtroom trials seem a little more theatric than they actually are. From my initial reaction, I noticed Mr. Bohanna’s poor choice of clothing. He decided to wear a black shirt and Jordan basketball shoes. I was always taught to wear appropriate clothing,…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jury is a group of 12 citizens selected randomly from an electronic register and make a verdict in a trial. The use of jury services in the UK legal system is always being challenged. Two articles with opposite point of view will be evaluated in this review. Since the focus of it is to evaluate the two articles, the jury system will not be examined in detail. The two articles are “The lamp that shows that freedom lives-is it worth the candle?” written by Penny Darbyshire (1991) and “A defence of jury nullification” by Thom Brooks (2004).…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ana Sofia Garza Mrs. Williams English II Pre-Ap 02 November 2016 Justice Many people have committed crimes. Some because that is what they do best and some because they don 't know any better and even some who commit crimes out of love, believing the crime is for a greater good. The United States criminal justice system should not allow for exceptions in the application of law due to the fact that justice should be applied equally to all. Even though a person might be disabled, a violation of the law or murder still remains as an illegal action.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “It took them only a short time to reach their verdict. “Guilty of murder in the first degree,” said the foreman of the jury” (David 15). The jury disregarded all of the reasonable doubt shown, and declared them guilty without even much deliberation. Despite this verdict, the defense had expected this and were ready to appeal the verdict. New evidence arose after the trial, and this evidence should have cleared the two of all guilt.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Simpson murder trial forever changed how courtroom proceedings occur. The many instances of mistakes on behalf of the LAPD over the years, as well as during the actual case ultimately proved to be the difference in the decision. These mistakes allowed the jury to consider that perhaps Simpson was being set up because he was African American. If these injustices on behalf of the LAPD did not occur, then only the factual evidence would have been presented in court. It would have been an easy murder conviction for Mr. Simpson.…

    • 2073 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays