Argumentative Essay: United States Criminal Justice System

Improved Essays
Ana Sofia Garza
Mrs. Williams
English II Pre-Ap
02 November 2016
Justice
Many people have committed crimes. Some because that is what they do best and some because they don 't know any better and even some who commit crimes out of love, believing the crime is for a greater good. The United States criminal justice system should not allow for exceptions in the application of law due to the fact that justice should be applied equally to all. Even though a person might be disabled, a violation of the law or murder still remains as an illegal action. Another reason is that the law should be applied equally for all. The third and final reason is that the criminal justice should treat everyone equal despite their moral beliefs. The main the reason
…show more content…
Some jurors might believe that some of the crimes were committed “compassionately” due to the fact that the crime was committed because it was to make someone 's life better and put them out of their misery. Others believe, that no matter why the crime was committed, a crime is a crime, so they should be punished without any leniency. All of the crimes should have an equal consequence, because some people might take advantage of the leniency of the laws , and can make it look like they need a lenient punishment. As a result, serial killers might go free and roam the streets again just because it will seem like he/she killed someone in the act of “love” or even to make the world better. Finally, the criminal justice should treat everyone equal despite their morality beliefs. Even though the crimes may look like they were committed for the greater good, it doesn 't stop from being a crime. Taking an innocent life will never be good. A good act should be helping people, not killing them. Killing people should never be counted as a “compassion” act, it should never have a lenient law. Laws should stay strong and act the same toward all people. And everyone should obey the laws, no matter

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It is not an ideal situation but it is better than dying for a crime that a person did not commit. Also, if the person was framed for the crime they are able to move on with their life from prison when they are found not guilty. While there are a few pros on what capital punishment can do, such as the ultimate punishment to the worst criminals to being more cost effective, many studies show that it does not deter crime. The inmates who committed the crime would have still committed the crime due to various reasons, from the heat of passion to being under the influence of drugs and alcohol. Because of this and the fact that a person may be innocent, capital punishment just seems like a cruel and unusual punishment that does not help with the crime…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When a murders commits the crime there is no punishment that can be appropriate then capital punishment. Not saying every time there is a murder there should equal to being sentenced to capital punishment, but depending severity of crime would indicate the appropriate punishment. Capital punishment is not globally used, but does not mean its incorrect when done in a human manner; it should conduct a way that would be seen as acceptable any society. Civilization moral advancements has always boiled down to two critical aspects which include good and bad behaviors in society. As a government trying to conduct the right practices in a good manner would seem to fit the thought experiment of capital punishment, for fairness is clear only if…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning Capital Punishment

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Some criminals who have committed many violent crimes for example robbery, rape, and murder are walking the streets like normal citizens because we are much too lenient on them. If the death penalty is instituted, there would not be as many daring and violent crimes as there are presently. Our present laws are much too "soft" on criminals. We need to get stricter. To afraid those criminals, government had strengthen legal by giving those criminals a merciless capital punishment so that can set an example to those criminals or people who want to commit a crime and it will provide a safer environment to the society.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What about the people who could not show the evidence of their innocence because of inadequate resources? There might be many cases where innocent people were executed because they did not have enough resources and/or a good attorney. The government should be responsible for giving a better attorney and advisors to the criminal and provide them full resources to defend themselves. It should offer spiritual advisors to both, the convicted criminal and the victim’s families. In addition to this, execution should not be affected by the amount of money a person has, and the government should make sure that such inequities do not…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Governments should not violate those human rights because they are the ones who should protect the people. Saving the innocent people shouldn't be a valuable excuse to torture someone. Torture is unethical, inhumane, an insufficient way to gather information, and society should never allow…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once they are dead its over no mulligans, so it should be difficult to make this decision. Koch has a great quote where he says; “If government functioned only when the possibility of error didn 't exist, government wouldn 't function at all.” meaning that government his flawed at all levels and should not be trusted with life. The most important replay Koch gives is does the death penalty cheapen the cost of a life. The death penalty must be seen as the ultimate punishment and not throw around. Yes Koch says if you cannot measure the cost of a human life, but murder can be a ruthless crime, but to condemn another man to death is not only costing that man his life but the emotional weight on the judge jury and the…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The rational choice theory and the classical theory are very similar in their opinions as to why crime is committed. I have always felt, and still feel that crime is committed for the sheer pleasure and gain of the reward versus the risk. Sure, offenders can be caught, charged, convicted and sentenced, but this does not mean that offenders will stop committing crimes forever, which tells us that the rational choice theory may not apply to these offenders, but these would likely be offenders who a serial in nature and committing crimes that are more serious than those that mostly fall under the rational choice theory. I was unable to apply other theories throughout our readings to truly identify the most common reason as to why crime is committed, because it appeared that not only my opinion, but the actual research applied, was able to adequately back-up the true reason, which is personal gain. “Classical theory, people are rational and concerned with minimizing their pain and maximizing their pleasure.” (Cullen, Agnew, Wilcox, 2014, p. 27).…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, collectively we view punishment slightly differently. We still may have an emotional response as a citizen, however, courts are supposed to be unemotional and just. Therefore, we as a society are all basically in unity that an acceptable punishment has been delivered to a particular criminal, and none of the characteristics above have been violated, this in itself promotes our unity (Garland, 1993). According to Mead (1918), punishment is in place to first of all make the criminal pay for their actions. Punishment is also in place to deter others who may commit the same offense to be discouraged due to the proportionality of the punishment to the offense.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Debate

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Punishment also helps murder victims families become more less on their toes but rather justice will be served and they wont have to live in fear anymore. Some may see this as a type of revenge to get back at the criminal, but this punishment is not done to do harm on another, it is done for the need of justice. The shortness of wrong intentions is proven in the definition of retribution from Justifications for Capital Punishment: “retribution is a state sponsored, rational response to criminality that is justified given that the state is the victim when a crime occurs”. This helps bring back peace to victims families after they had been brought upon to these horrific…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kahan states, “ As a result, judges, legislators, and the public at large generally do accept shame as a morally appropriate punishment for drunken driving, non-aggravated assaults, embezzlement, small-scale drug distribution and etc.” (582) Kahan demonstrates that it is easier for lawbreakers to be punished for their actions in this way, simply because it helps them to come to the awareness that their actions result in consequences. And of course, if judges are providing them with opportunities to not go to jail, then they should take that in consideration, and work on changing their behavior if they don’t want to end up in jail. Without a hit of doubt a criminal record is not the most convenient thing to have on ones personal file because it limits them with opportunities that life has to…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays