Explain Why Scotland Be Independent And It Should Remain In The UK

Decent Essays
Say No To Independence
No. Say no to independence, I believe that scotland should not be independent and it should remain in the UK. I don't want to live in a country where i don't feel safe, where my government doesnt support our services, and i certainly don't wan to live in a country with a very poor economy.
First of all scotland are alot safer in the uk as The Foreign Office noted that 'enemies of britain would use "uncertainty and distraction" in the wake of a yes vote to manipulate the situation for their own ends'.They also stated that we are also protected from threats as broad as ISIS and domestic terror incidents by Britains world renowned intelligence services. This means that a terror attack is very unlikely to happen if we are
…show more content…
Even though westminster has cut our block grant (a grant from the government which a local authority can allocate to a wide range of services), it still remains fact that scotland gets more per head in public services spending than England. £10,536 is spent each year on people her in scotland, which is £1,460 more than the UK average of £9,076. If Scotland were to become independent there is a big chance this could drop dramatically. I think this plays a big factor in why you should vote no in the next independence referendum.
On the other hand if Scotland were to become independent north sea oil revenues would be put to good use. Up until now, tax revenue from North Sea oil has gone to the UK Treasury and been used for general expenditure. The SNP says it would set up an Energy Fund, both to bring stability when oil prices fluctuate, and for ­investment to ensure future generations also benefit from oil and gas reserves. So to be fair that is a very good argument for scotland to become independent.
So in conclusion would you want to live in a country where you dont feel safe or a country with a very poor economy? i know i would'nt. So that is why i think you should vote no in the independence referendum. So we can have a safe country, a country with a decent economy and a country that gives it's services the funding that it

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    When was the last time you thought about the declaration of independents and in how it's affecting people,do you ever think there's a negative or a positive outcome to the laws they made? The declaration of independents is divided into four sections, one equality, secondly any rights that were made can't be removed, power that comes from the governed ,and lastly the power to remove government officials.when looking at these roles one can say that some benefit citizens more than others. I believe that equality (document A) is most important because it has a vast priority in always winning, since we would want to be treated equal don't we?…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the Declaration of Independence is says, " Great Britain has a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. " The Colonies were justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain for several reasons. Britain was enacting tax laws and other Declarations against the Colonist that bound them and would not allow them representation in Parliment. One of the main reasons for breaking away from Britain was due to taxes. Britain was trying to make money to pay its war debts.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Were the colonists justified in declaring independence from England? While causing conflict between nations, sparks the start of wars, YES, they were justified because we gain fair rights as human beings, we started the greatest country in the world, a great government system, and gain independence from the British…

    • 50 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1980 Quebec Referendums

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A crucial aspect of any political question is the demographic regarding the issue. A referendum is a vote performed by the affected public relating to a specific issue. Therefore, the 1980 and 1995 Quebec referendums about pursuing sovereignty greatly rely on the general public’s view. Upon analysis of the results of both votes, it is clear that independence for Quebec should not be granted. In the 1980 referendum, in which 84.3 percent of the Quebec population voted, 59.5 percent of voters were opposed to the idea of Quebec seceding from Canada, leaving the remainder 40.5 percent in favor of the idea (“1980 Referendum”).…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no need to have an established fear in the central government, our separation from Great Britain proves otherwise. Our independence should be enough proof that we are not trying to become another monarch where people don’t get a voice. Establishing a strong central government requires a lot of support from the people, which is why The Articles of Confederation wouldn’t suffice to the needs we demand. Having a stronger central government will unite us together and fuse us as one voice as opposed to allowing the states to have sovereign power.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What would America be like today if people from America’s beginning tried to reconcile with Great Britain in the late 1700’s instead of declaring independence? Would they have just gone to war anyway? Or would America even be called the country it is today? America’s founding fathers created the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776 and is the reason why Americans celebrate Independence Day today. The Declaration was written to state grievances, or complaints, early Americans had with King George and Great Britain.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, it cannot be overlooked that a vote for SNP does not necessarily go hand in hand with a vote for Scottish Independence. This became apparent with the SNP domination during the 2015 General Election, and in turn the result of the Scottish independence referendum. The results showed SNP recording a ‘historic landslide’ of seats in Scotland, winning 56 out of a possible 59 (BBC, 2015), Yet the subsequent losing of the referendum with a majority of the ‘No” vote was a sign that the SNP has a diverse base of supporters with a diverse political agenda. BBC political analyst Brian Taylor suggests that in fact, the landslide win by SNP “tells us nothing at all about independence-other than the fact that the people of Scotland were not seemingly scared to endorse a party whose reason for being is to end the Union” (Taylor, 2015). Instead, we can infer that some votes for SNP are what we can label as ‘protest votes’, making the SNP a ‘protest party’ of sorts (Gallagher, 2015)…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The indisputably superior naval strength and differences in manpower are the next problems brought up before the author. The loyalist argument against immediate independence is as follows: as of 1775 England possesses the strongest and biggest naval power in the world. With great naval dominance, then, England is able to form various colonies across the globe. The obvious difference in the number of able men ready to fight in battle provides a logical reason to decline an immediate independence. To this statement, Paine retorts, that it is now that they must react, as America has the strength to fight back.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Revolution necessary for independence and freedom according to the Americans. The reasons as to why they needed to leave the British empire was indeed necessary, but did it really fix anything for American? In my opinion “The American Revolution” was not very revolutionary for the U.S and the citizens. The U.S. was in debt, no rights changed for women and slaves, and U.S. was not united after the Revolution so nothing really changed for the Americans after the war.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reasons why Scottish people want to become independent: -Democracy and self-determination: Scottish people as we have seen have a different view in which regards politics and culture so their own people are best placed in order to take decisions regarding Scotland. -They also want to control their defence and foreign policy independently from the UK. - The issue with Scottish oil: “It’s Scotland’s oil” has been used as an effective slogan by the SNP during the 70’s, they claim that an independent Scotland would take more advantage of its national sources, due to the fact that 64% of the EU’s oil reserves exist in the Northern Sea (Scottish waters) “Scotland is sitting on oil and gas reserves worth up to £4 trillion”. -The…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I would be a patriot because I think people should put Britain, a place very far away from America, away. It is a very great idea to keep places separated because it will cause issues in the future. There may not even that much stuff going around. There are a lot of ways that America should be separated. America already has a lot of problems, making Britain own this could cause a disaster.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Secession

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the past century, states’ rights has become an idea more than an actual right given to the people. The Central Government has gradually gathered more power for itself and, as a consequence, leaving states wanting. In December of 1860, South Carolina tried to solve this problem by seceding from the union. While it would be unfair to say that this caused the civil war, it defiantly was a factor. But since then, the problem has only grown worse.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Voting: a Right or a Requirement? Although only 60% of eligible voters vote, voting should be an option rather than a mandatory task. People have their reasons for voting and not voting, and they should be the ones to decide whether they want to or not, rather than forcing someone who isn’t educated in politics to vote, which could completely change the outcome of an election. Compulsory voting would be a bad idea as it would alter the results negatively by causing people who don’t care about politics to just vote for someone randomly, the idea itself is unconstitutional and against everything the document says, and it would just ruin the point of voting as results could end up being inaccurate.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scottish independence has been a hot topic for a while now. One one side you have the people that think Scotland should leave the U.K. On the other side of the argument there are the people who think it would be better for everybody if Scotland remained part of the U.K. Scotland has been apart of the u.k for over 300 years. This is part of the reason that the people of scotland want to leave, to try something new That might work out in their favor.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Did you know only around fifty to sixty percent of registered voters actually go to the polls? This is a problem that the United States has been facing for decades and because of these low turnouts, some people say that voting should be made compulsory. Compulsory, as defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary, is, “required by a law or rule”. I think that voting should not be made compulsory because voting is a right, not a duty; there are alternatives that tackle the real causes of voter disengagement; and persuasion is more effective than coercion. When looking at this debate it is good to first look at this question: is voting a right or a duty?…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays