Gaunilo's Argument Analysis

Superior Essays
Show More
In this paper, I will support the idea of the existence of God. First I will present Anselm’s ontological argument for the existence of God, then I will present Gaunilo’s criticism on Anselm’s argument. Finally, I will show the coherent existence of God and evil.
To understand the argument for the existence of God, we first define the usage of God in this paper. God is the greatest conceivable being who is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent. He is capable of knowing everything and doing everything, and has perfect goodness.
In the ontological argument, Anselm defined God as the greatest conceivable being that nothing greater than Him can be conceived. Suppose God exists in the mind alone. It is better for Him to exist in the mind and in reality than to exist in the mind alone. If God exists only in the mind, then we can imagine that there is something greater than Him. However, we cannot imagine something is greater than God since it will have a contradiction to the idea of God as the greatest conceivable being. Therefore, God exists in reality.
Existence is a good thing. Imagining that my future husband will be a better one if he is attentive than if he is not. It will be even better if he exists than if he is not. Since God is the omniscient, omnipotent, and …show more content…
Suppose God is omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient that we have defined in the beginning of the paper. An omnibenevolent being always eliminates as much as evil as possible. An omnipotent being has the power to do anything. An omniscient being knows what is going to happen. If God possesses the Omni-characteristics, He always stops as much as evil as possible, has the power to do so and to know what is come. He eliminates all evil; however, evil exists in reality. Then God could not be omnibenevolent, omnipotent, or omniscient which the greatest conceivable being

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Richard Swinburne's Theodicy: The Logical And Evidential Problem Of Evil
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Richard Swinburne's Theodicy: The Logical And Evidential Problem Of Evil

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Fifth Meditation: The Ontological Argument For God
    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Descartes Fifth Meditation: The Ontological Argument For God

    Descartes fifth Meditation presents the Ontological Argument for God’s Existence. Though many people find Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence to be an unpersuasive and weak argument, I find it is a very strong argument that provides a strong foundation and argument for God’s existence. In this paper I plan to elaborate upon Descartes fifth meditation and slightly over the first and third. After this I will then explain its strong points and weaknesses. I believe Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence in Meditation five to be a strong and persuasive argument.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of Evil And Omnipotence By Mackie
    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary Of Evil And Omnipotence By Mackie

    God is omnipotent God is omnibenevolent Yet Evil exists What comes next is how I will explain why Mackie believes the premises, with supporting points from the paragraph located on p.124 where Mackie starts…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Gaunilo's Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gaunilo's Ontological Argument Analysis

    Gaunilo responds to the Ontological Argument by saying that the argument “proves too much”. By this, Gaunilo means that the Ontological Argument could be applied to anything, not just God; even things that we know do not exist. The example that Gaunilo uses is conceiving the most perfect island than which no greater island is possible. The most perfect island must exist in reality and in the mind, because if it did not, then it would be possible to conceive of an island greater than the most perfect island, that is one that actually exists. Therefore, Gaunilo is arguing that by using Anselm’s reasoning, it is better to exist (in the mind and reality) than to not exist, for if it did not exist, it would not be as perfect.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    A Scientific Argument For The Existence Of God Analysis
    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A Scientific Argument For The Existence Of God Analysis

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    'Roundtable Discussion On The Problem Of Evil'
    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    'Roundtable Discussion On The Problem Of Evil'

    It should also be made clear that I will not argue for the existence of God in this paper, but instead argue that the Problem of Evil does not pose an issue for…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes Meditation 3 Analysis
    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rene Descartes Meditation 3 Analysis

    “A substance that is infinite, eternal, immutable, independent, supremely intelligent, supremely powerful” (30). This is his idea of what “God” means to him. But if every idea has a formal reality, where did he get this idea from? God must be the cause of this idea therefore God does exist.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ontological Argument St Anselm Summary
    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ontological Argument St Anselm Summary

    In the piece of Ontological Argument, St. Anselm argues that being able to exist in both reality and in understanding is the best to humans. He specifically focuses on the topic of an omnient God. He does use a reducto in his argument, so part of the premises contradict, but this contradiction strengthens the proof for the conclusion. I agree with his point of view. St. Anselm refers back to the difference between conceiving in concept vs in realty, all though out his writing.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Swinburne's Existence: The Logical Problem Of Evil
    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Swinburne's Existence: The Logical Problem Of Evil

    The reason why we give this up is because getting rid of God being omnibenevolent would diminish the idea of him existing. Not only that, you can’t get rid of evil because evil actually…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ontological Argument By Philosopher St. Anselm Of Canterbury
    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ontological Argument By Philosopher St. Anselm Of Canterbury

    The Ontological argument, written by philosopher St. Anselm of Canterbury in his book the Proslogion in the eleventh century, is a metaphysical argument for the existence of God in reality. In this essay I will discuss the validity of this argument. In this text Anselm states that the concept of God has the necessary and sufficient condition of being maximally perfect- ‘that than which a greater cannot be thought’- and that, since existing in reality is greater than existing only conceptually, God must exist in reality as well. Thus, if you understand the concept of God, you must agree that he is the greatest and that he exists, since these are written into the framework of the concept.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Why God Allows Evil By Ernest Nagel And Does God Exist?
    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why God Allows Evil By Ernest Nagel And Does God Exist?

    At a young age majority of us grew up believing that there is a higher being above us that created us, that shaped our lives to be where it is now, and that being is known as god. When we were a child, we did not have a choice whether we truly believed in the existence of God. We were told what to believe and never questioned it that belief. In this essay, I will analyze the existence of god between “Does God Exist?” by Ernest Nagel and “Why God Allows Evil” by Richard Swinburne. Although Nagel rejects the existence of God, he establishes two causes for why God exists.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Ontological Argument
    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Ontological Argument

    His argument states that God is the most perfect thing possible. After defining god as the greatest conceivable thing he asks “what is greater god as an idea or god as an existing thing?” if it is agreed that existing is always better than not existing god as an existing being is greater than god as an idea, therefore god must exist as if god is just an idea then he is not the most perfect conceivable thing. God must exist by…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mackie Evil And Existence Summary
    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mackie Evil And Existence Summary

    This paper states one of many answers to the presence of evil and questioning God’s omnipotence presented by Mackie in his article “Evil and Omnipotence”. Mackie has his own “Inconsistent TRIAD” formula that states: 1. God is omnipotent 2. God is omnibenevolent 3. Evil exists.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument Of Good Vs. Evil And The Existence Of God
    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Argument Of Good Vs. Evil And The Existence Of God

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle's Cosmological Argument: The Existence Of God
    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle's Cosmological Argument: The Existence Of God

    The Existence of God This argument about the existence of God, better known as the cosmological argument, begins with the late philosopher Aristotle. Similar to a modern day natural scientist, he believed that we could ascertain more about the world and the very fundamental nature of things within our world just by observing and recording. In many ways Aristotle resemble a modern day artist, a person who goes through life experiencing and watching all different types of energy that’s around, visually records this information and help others by spreading this knowledge to the mass. Aristotle too, would look and study the world and its patterns that were around him in order to gain insight into his world.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings