Then, before presenting my Trinitarian idea of evolution, I discuss the method I use in this paper and the core contents of evolutionary biology. Next, my discussion divides into two sections on divine purpose and goodness reflected in evolution. Next, engaging with evolutionary theodicy, I present a Trinitarian divine action in creation in the context of the eschatological ontology of creation. I believe this study is significant in that it goes beyond metaphysical naturalism, scientific creationism, and the two-language approach by respecting both the integrity of natural sciences and the gospel of God’s self-communication in Christ and the ecclesial community’s Christocentric reasoning in the presence of the …show more content…
I think this view does not befit the Trinitarian nature of the Christian doctrine based on the NT’s cosmic Christology and pnematology. While creation is the context of God’s redeeming of humanity, creation itself should not be excluded from the saving work of God. In that vein, Gunton laments the Western inclination “to subordinate creation to redemption” because it transpires that “the status of the material world as a whole is endangered.” I think the genuine value of creation is to be seen within the Trinitarian history that encompasses creatio originalis, continua, and nova. Thus, the cross of Christ tells us the value of creation. In this light, I discuss from the next section how a Trinitarian theology of nature can help us see the seemingly purposeless and death-ridden history of evolution as God’s purposeful and good creation. To that end, it is important to re-conceive theological method for dialogue between theology and