• Home Page
  • Should The Government Abolish The Death Penalty?

Should The Government Abolish The Death Penalty?

Improved Essays
Show More
In the United States the death penalty is the best way to punish someone convicted of first degree murder. The law believes that this act will bring families of the victim’s at peace, and that they will be able to sleep at night; knowing that the person who took their love one’s life has been put to death. In actuality these families will never live the same again, and they will never look at life the same; dealing with death is a personal experience and the state executing someone will not do anything to make the process better. Capital punishment in no shape or form solves this tragic issue; murders have been committing murders for years. This way of punishment has been carried on through centuries, since one could be executed for stealing …show more content…
(‘Death Penalty Information Center’). Putting the right murder in a high level security prison is more likely to keep citizens safe and save taxpayers money; which may defer poverty in the U.S. The cost alone should give more than enough reason for the government to abolish the death penalty, the funds should be put towards crime prevention; not criminal inspiration. With trial fees, attorney fees, and high top level of security needed, each death row inmate cost about $ 1Million dollars per case. (“Death Penalty Information Center’). This piece of information refers back to the point that the death penalty is another way for the United States to kill off its population, this system is clearly involving economics. It would be smarter economic wise to commute all death row sentences over to life in prison terms. Its seems as though because of the cost of trials, other fees, and room &board, the government believes that its more cost efficient to send these citizens to the gas chamber. There are over 3,000 states prisoners on death row today; which means by the end of the year over 50 inmates will be executed. (Death Penalty, p.1, 2015 Capital punishment forces the government to have to hire more law enforcement, however the 31 states with the death penalty continues to have the highest murder rates. (ACLU).) Capital punishment only gives false security to the public eye, the system tries to make the public believe that they are safer with these individuals underground. This is a misconception of what the death penalty really does for their citizens, they attempt to make the public believe that this form of punishment will make murders apprehensive to committing these crimes. The death penalty is an insufficient policy towards homicide

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Reggie Clemon
    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Reggie Clemon

    As Thoreau says, “It is not a man’s duty, as a matter of course, to devote himself to the eradication of any, even the most enormous wrong,” which sums up how the death penalty shouldn’t be allowed since no man should be tasked with the duty of taking the life of someone else do to their crimes and wrong doing; it’s hypocrisy (Thoreau). The death penalty is often thought to be cheaper than holding a prisoner for life, but that is false (OADP). It is believe that the state would save around 2.3 million dollars if they got rid of the death penalty, but the death penalty already causes around 9 million dollars a year (OADP). All of that money would be much better off helping the victims affected by the crimes of the criminals put on death row to give the victims counseling and assistance where needed. The death penalty also does not deter crime because states without the death penalty tend to have lower murder rates than neighboring states that do have the death penalty (OADP). The death penalty is only still living due to the misconceptions and can only be put away for good if the US citizens show their distaste for the barbaric punishment. Instead the US is spending millions of unnecessary dollars on executions and believing it deters crime which is also false (OADP). Reggie Clemons lost many years of his life due to the grueling system of death row and prison and the citizens of the US paid for it…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Issue Of Abolishing The Death Penalty
    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Issue Of Abolishing The Death Penalty

    The death penalty has been a solution to crimes constantly. Justice systems around the world have chosen to take the life of a criminal instead of sentencing them to life in prison. Capital punishment should be abolished because the justice system should not have the authority to take a criminal’s life. According to capital punishment laws, it is not justified for a criminal to take a life, but it is acceptable for a member of the justice system to take that criminal’s life. The death penalty costs taxpayers more money than prison holdings, is religiously immoral, is an unscrupulous solution for homicide victims’ families, and puts innocents at risk. The only way to solve this problem, is for the United States of America to abolish…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Is The Death Penalty Justified?
    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is The Death Penalty Justified?

    The cost of carrying out an execution consists of the maintainer of an electric chair, lethal injections or other devices used for executions, cost related to execution and burial of the person executed. There’s also the attorney cost which is higher in capital cases because attorneys spend an abundant amount of hours at each level of the criminal proceedings. A prisoner spends an average of eight years on death row and during this time the prisoner must be maintained in a special maximum security facility for death row inmates. In 1978, the annual cost of housing a prisoner in New York was $15,050 while the cost of maintaining the prisoner was $602,000. Similarly in Florida, the expense of death row and execution is estimated to be six times more. The prisoners, condemned, are not permitted to work in the prison to repay the state for the costs of his or her confinement. . A single death penalty case ranges from $1 million to $3 million. The state of California has the largest and costliest death row amounting to 714 inmates. Between 1980 and 2012, California spent about $4.6 billion dollars on the death penalty for 13 people. This equal $308 million on one execution. In North Carolina, a study performed found that there would be a $2 million difference between a death sentence and a life without parole sentence. It has been found that a death penalty case costs about $3 million, which is three times the cost of 40 years imprisonment of an inmate (Cuomo, 1956). I think that the death penalty should be abolished, but should be replaced with a punishment that has a similar effect but is less expensive. True life imprisonment seems more effective than the capital punishment. To most inmates, the thought of spending the rest of their lives behind bars only to die in a cell is worse than a quick death by lethal injection. In 1995, an inmate was…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Passaro Case
    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Michael Passaro Case

    Maintaining the death row prisoner costs taxpayers $90,000 more per year than a prisoner in general population. The death penalty is enormously expensive with no clear benefits. Now the real question at hand is, is it worth it to give these criminals something that they are already wanting - the death penalty - and really have no justice served? Some may argue that the price for the execution of a murderer is very much beneficial because they are no longer standing in our society. Most of these sayings are biased because their wanting of the death penalty is tied in with morals. We have to look at the bigger picture. Preventing executions forces these criminals to have to live with the actions that they chose. Preventing executions also saves the system from millions of dollars that can eventually be contributed back into the society so that there’s no financial loses and justice is still…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Harlem Lewis Arguments Against Capital Punishment
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Harlem Lewis Arguments Against Capital Punishment

    However, in a civic view, it does not rely on anybody the right to take other people’s lives. Several countries and states throughout the United Sates, which have abolished capital punishment, noticed a subsequent decrease on what is called murder. In other words, the intention of capital punishment is to lower the murder rates, however, what it truly does is increasing it, leading capital punishment laws to a failure law enforcement. For example, in 1976, before capital punishment was abolished, three homicides were committed per 100,000 people in Canada. After the death penalty was abolished, 1.85 murders per 100,000 people in 2003. To keep one prisoner on the death row costs $90,000 for the United States taxpayers. Cases without capital punishment involved cost up to $740,000, while $1.26 million is spent in cases where the death penalty is present. It not only for a moral cause, but also for the costs it takes to go through the death penalty process. It is understandable that governments find this sort of punishments a way to maintain the safety of their population, it has not been as effective as it should…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty In America Book Report
    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Death Penalty In America Book Report

    With the death penalty comes the expense of it. Why should the Department of criminal justice pay millions of dollars on one execution when the person who will be executed more than likely didn’t spend any money on the person that they killed? The justice departments have been using the defense that the death penalty will help to cut back on crime and use it as a deterrent effect, but in reality it does little to actually change the amount of crimes that are being committed. The book, Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies talks about how one of politicians main focuses now when discussing crime and the effects of it on the community is that they “worry about appearing soft on crime”. When determining if the death penalty is an efficient…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The High Cost Of The Death Penalty
    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The High Cost Of The Death Penalty

    However, according to a study done by the Death Penalty Information Center, in 2013 states that did not have the death penalty had a 22% lower murder rate than states with the death penalty. As evidence of this, the death penalty should be changed or abolished to lower crime rates, which would keep some would-be criminals out of jail and off of death row. This cuts down on costs for the state, and by extension, the taxpayers. While many would argue that the possibility of being put on death row would scare many would-be criminals away from committing crimes and murders, due to that fact that it has been proven to have the opposite effect, the death penalty should be taken out of the judicial system to cut costs for state…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty In Australia
    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Death Penalty In Australia

    Secondly, Many people think as long as the criminals are executed from the world, they can get relief and comfort but the comfort just temporarily stay in people’s minds, because killing doesn’t discourage crimes to go down. We need to clarify it is basically wrong to kill and death penalty equals to killing, and killing will send wrong messages to people and little kids that killing is an ok thing to do. So if death penalty can’t be solve anything, why should we adopt it such a severe, inhumane and cruel penalty punishment?…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Divine Command Theory, And Ethical Theories Of Capital Punishment
    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Divine Command Theory, And Ethical Theories Of Capital Punishment

    According to article Capital punishment states, “some crimes are so heinous and inherently wrong that they demand strict penalties—up to and including life sentences or even death," (par,8). They believe that the death penalty is effective and preventive to violent crime because criminals will now think twice before committing a murder. "Recent investigations, using a variety of samples and statistical methods, consistently demonstrate a strong link between executions and reduced murder rates," (capital, par.10). They believe having the inmate sit in jail is too expensive because it cost taxpayers “$31,286” per inmate annually (capital, par…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Capital Punishment
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Immanuel Kant On Capital Punishment

    The issue of capital punishment has in the last decades attracted a heated controversy, due to its extensive use and the severity with which it has been inflicted, especially on murderers. Death penalty has become the ultimate punishment for criminals, due to the reason that no punishment for such people is harsher than death itself. Currently, more than fifty countries across the globe practice the death penalty, with the United States included (Jane & Sidney, 2006). Capital punishment has become the preferred form of punishment for persons who commit first-degree murder, with the hope that such a serious sentence will reduce the number of murderers. However, although some people fully support the death sentence penalty, others are completely…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Cost Benefit Analysis
    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Death Penalty Cost Benefit Analysis

    When the death penalty is subjected to a cost benefit analysis, the ledger is one sided- huge costs both social and monetary and no discernable benefits, other than perhaps mollifying a hunger for retribution (“Reflections…”). A Seattle University did a study on the death penalty of examining the costs of how much money would have to be paid in order to execute it. The penalty case was found on average to cost one million dollars more than a similar case where the death penalty was not sought. Defense costs were about three times as high in death penalty cases and prosecution costs were as much as four times higher (“Death…”). There is no doubt that here has been innocent people have been executed throughout the decades. When this happens, it is not really a financial cost as much as a heartbreaking loss for the families that had to live their lives knowing that a family member had to die and innocent death. It is not fair that an innocent man or women would have to lose their life even if they do not know for sure if they are the ones that are guilty…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Limiting The Death Penalty
    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Limiting The Death Penalty

    Crime is one of the biggest issues for humanity. With any crime comes its punishment. The punishment, of course, should be one that fits the crime. In many societies throughout time, the punishment for extreme crimes has been execution. It is an issue that many people feel very strongly about. It is an emotional issue that undergoes much debate. Known in our time as death penalty or capital punishment, it is not effective in stopping crime, nor is it right. Capital punishment should not be used under any circumstance. It has not caused a decrease in criminal activity. It is also very expensive to carry out. Racial bias and many errors have been present in the process of capital punishment. Both political and religious figures have taken a stand…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Death Penalty Should Not Be Abolished
    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Death Penalty Should Not Be Abolished

    “Emory University researchers, including Paul Rubin, said, “The national sorting of crime rates each execution prevented 18 deaths.” That is 18 lives saved due to capital punishment. However, there are several why reasons the death penalty could be abolished. Comparatively, the death penalty is considered an unjust act towards humanity. That “an eye for an eye” isn’t necessarily the right way to handle such heinous crimes. Whereas most of the United States feel as though life without parole would be the best option for these criminals. An article from the ACLU website states, “No one sentenced to life without parole has ever been released on parole. Prisoners sentenced to LWOP actually stay in prison until they die.” Statics show that one of the biggest reasons the death penalty should be abolished is because of the amount of money spent to execute a person. An article written in the Denver post states that “Between 1977-2002, 250 million dollars was spent to carry out the sentences of 11 prisoners executed in California.” Additionally, this is such a substantial amount of money that could have been spent on government jail programs or put towards other safety…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    What Are The Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Death Penalty
    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What Are The Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Death Penalty

    Imagine being awoken at two in the morning to flashing lights out your window, screaming sirens, and a police officer beating on your door, only to find out you are being arrested for a crime you did not commit. Imagine for the next twenty five years you sit in a jail cell waiting to be put to death for this crime you were convicted of, but you know you did not commit. As stated in the article “Death Penalty,” many people are sitting in jail cells across the country on death row for crimes they have not committed and waiting for the day to arrive that their life will end. According to the article states across the country are contemplating abolishing the death penalty altogether partly because of this reason (Death Penalty). In this informational…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Is The Death Penalty?
    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Is The Death Penalty?

    A study of Los Angeles County trials has shown that the average trial in which prosecutors demand the death penalty costs $1,898,323, while a murder trial where the death penalty is not sought comes in at $627,322. Death penalty is the most expensive because the constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for any capital cases. The process is required to make sure that innocent men and women are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and also to protect the innocent person from getting executed. According to George Sjostrom, “The cost of the death penalty is too high, both in dollars and in emotional pain,” (192). If we replace the death penalty with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, it will cost millions less and also ensures that the public is safe and protected and we will also eliminate the risk of…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings