Should The Government Abolish The Death Penalty?

Improved Essays
In the United States the death penalty is the best way to punish someone convicted of first degree murder. The law believes that this act will bring families of the victim’s at peace, and that they will be able to sleep at night; knowing that the person who took their love one’s life has been put to death. In actuality these families will never live the same again, and they will never look at life the same; dealing with death is a personal experience and the state executing someone will not do anything to make the process better. Capital punishment in no shape or form solves this tragic issue; murders have been committing murders for years. This way of punishment has been carried on through centuries, since one could be executed for stealing …show more content…
(‘Death Penalty Information Center’). Putting the right murder in a high level security prison is more likely to keep citizens safe and save taxpayers money; which may defer poverty in the U.S. The cost alone should give more than enough reason for the government to abolish the death penalty, the funds should be put towards crime prevention; not criminal inspiration. With trial fees, attorney fees, and high top level of security needed, each death row inmate cost about $ 1Million dollars per case. (“Death Penalty Information Center’). This piece of information refers back to the point that the death penalty is another way for the United States to kill off its population, this system is clearly involving economics. It would be smarter economic wise to commute all death row sentences over to life in prison terms. Its seems as though because of the cost of trials, other fees, and room &board, the government believes that its more cost efficient to send these citizens to the gas chamber. There are over 3,000 states prisoners on death row today; which means by the end of the year over 50 inmates will be executed. (Death Penalty, p.1, 2015 Capital punishment forces the government to have to hire more law enforcement, however the 31 states with the death penalty continues to have the highest murder rates. (ACLU).) Capital punishment only gives false security to the public eye, the system tries to make the public believe that they are safer with these individuals underground. This is a misconception of what the death penalty really does for their citizens, they attempt to make the public believe that this form of punishment will make murders apprehensive to committing these crimes. The death penalty is an insufficient policy towards homicide

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in a civic view, it does not rely on anybody the right to take other people’s lives. Several countries and states throughout the United Sates, which have abolished capital punishment, noticed a subsequent decrease on what is called murder. In other words, the intention of capital punishment is to lower the murder rates, however, what it truly does is increasing it, leading capital punishment laws to a failure law enforcement. For example, in 1976, before capital punishment was abolished, three homicides were committed per 100,000 people in Canada. After the death penalty was abolished, 1.85 murders per 100,000 people in 2003.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the death penalty comes the expense of it. Why should the Department of criminal justice pay millions of dollars on one execution when the person who will be executed more than likely didn’t spend any money on the person that they killed? The justice departments have been using the defense that the death penalty will help to cut back on crime and use it as a deterrent effect, but in reality it does little to actually change the amount of crimes that are being committed. The book, Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies talks about how one of politicians main focuses now when discussing crime and the effects of it on the community is that they “worry about appearing soft on crime”. When determining if the death penalty is an efficient…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When yopu keep the criminals alive if there prison sentence is short they can get out of prison and go kill another person if we had death penalty in those states without it this would never happen. As the criminals are getting away and staying alive and killing more people. having the death penalty will be safer for not just citizens but the other prisoners in the prison also, there has been killings inside prisons all the time with these crazy mad people if we had death penalty this would also never happen. "An overwhelming majority of Americans support a death penalty for those--and only those--who deserve to die.” Most people think that the capital punishment is not necessary because it is cruel and unnecessary but once they saw the outcome and saw how much the death penalty can make us safer and not be scared to go to unsafe and dangerous…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem is, some sentenced to death row are spending years awaiting the death sentence to be carried out. According to The Economist,…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Within the United States of America, the death penalty is a continued controversy practice. The United States practices capital punishment on a state level; there are thirty-two states with the death penalty. Therefore, despite the ongoing battle to abolish the death penalty, majority of states comprehend the sentence as a necessary punishment to certain crimes committed within each state. In Texas a person can be sentenced to death row even if the criminal is not responsible for the actual murder while in Alabama that same criminal may not be punished to the degree of death.…

    • 3946 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a poll taken by Debate.org on whether a mass murderer should receive the death penalty or not, 50% verbalized yes and the other 44% verbally expressed no. According to Jack Levin, a professor of Sociology with Northeastern University, now virtually 80% of Americans favor the death penalty. Since the colonial times, more than 15,000 American citizens have been executed since the inception of the death penalty (American Civil Liberties Amalgamation-ACLU). According to the ACLU, the United States is the only Western democracy that opts not to notice capital penalization as a terrible human rights infringement. They go on to state their credence as this being “a frightening abuse of government power” (ACLU).…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Passaro Case

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Maintaining the death row prisoner costs taxpayers $90,000 more per year than a prisoner in general population. The death penalty is enormously expensive with no clear benefits. Now the real question at hand is, is it worth it to give these criminals something that they are already wanting - the death penalty - and really have no justice served? Some may argue that the price for the execution of a murderer is very much beneficial because they are no longer standing in our society. Most of these sayings are biased because their wanting of the death penalty is tied in with morals.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty costs taxpayers more money than prison holdings, is religiously immoral, is an unscrupulous solution for homicide victims’ families, and puts innocents at risk. The only way to solve this problem, is for the United States of America to abolish…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While the societal pendulum swings from keeping the death penalty to abolishing it, one thing is for certain; a light has been shined on the cost of the death penalty and the reflection of its effectiveness is shining through. These numbers are just a few statistics that show how much the death penalty is costing the hard working men and women of this…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a subject that can be and has been debated for lengthy amounts of time. There are still many countries that perform executions today, but many of these countries differ from the United States greatly. While the death penalty has been used as early as eighteenth century B.C., there is no doubt that there are many factors that make the death penalty a questionable subject in the modern United States. The death penalty should not be utilized in the United States because it is costly, inhumane, and inaccurate.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to article Capital punishment states, “some crimes are so heinous and inherently wrong that they demand strict penalties—up to and including life sentences or even death," (par,8). They believe that the death penalty is effective and preventive to violent crime because criminals will now think twice before committing a murder. " Recent investigations, using a variety of samples and statistical methods, consistently demonstrate a strong link between executions and reduced murder rates," (capital, par.10). They believe having the inmate sit in jail is too expensive because it cost taxpayers “$31,286” per inmate annually (capital, par…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That “an eye for an eye” isn’t necessarily the right way to handle such heinous crimes. Whereas most of the United States feel as though life without parole would be the best option for these criminals. An article from the ACLU website states, “No one sentenced to life without parole has ever been released on parole. Prisoners sentenced to LWOP actually stay in prison until they die.” Statics show that one of the biggest reasons the death penalty should be abolished is because of the amount of money spent to execute a person.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does the death penalty deter crime, especially murder? Is the death penalty just? Should the death penalty be reformed? The death penalty also known as capital punishment continues to be an issue of controversy for many years. It seems that public opinion on the death penalty has changed over the year and is still changing, but there are still other people who believe that the death penalty is a good punishment and will continue to believe.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment should be abolished because it is too expensive to retain, it is revenge not justice, and it 's possible for innocent people to be executed. The execution of human life should not be something we advocate here in the United States, it’s sad that as a nation we preach peace while still executing our citizens. The millions of dollars being wasted on executions could be spent improving our criminal justice system, and in doing so, improve our country. Not only is the death penalty a waste of our hard earned tax dollars, but it also puts innocent lives at risk. Mistreated or mishandled evidence can easily put an innocent life on death row.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays