Essay On Plea Bargaining

Improved Essays
After a criminal act has been committed the defendant has to go through certain processes to be free. Defendants are given the opportunity to either choose to accept guilt or go to trial. The most common choice that many people choose is to plead guilty because it has its benefits. Criminals lives are determined if they chose to plead guilty and have Brady rights for the crimes that they've committed.
Plea bargaining is when you plead guilty to a crime that you’ve committed. The defendant is always informed of what rights they are waiving. The judge has to determine if the defendant voluntarily plead guilty. The cons of plea bargaining are that you won’t get as many rights as you would if you didn’t plead guilty. You put yourself at more risk
…show more content…
Maryland was a court case that ruled on that any evidence found should be presented in front of the defendant. Brady guidelines should be applied because it offers information from the prosecutor to the defendant that can be useful for them to know. The only bad part of the presentation of evidence is that defendants can’t say that it is wrong since they’ve accepted guilt. Evidence can include DNA, reports, and witness statements. (Rennison et al.). The bad part of Brady rights is that it hides police and prosecutor misconduct. The prosecutor can charge the defendant more than what the defendant deserves. Judges aren’t really involved in plea deals (Robb 2017).
If I were convicted of a non-violent felony (first of all that wouldn’t even happen) I would choose to go to trial because I’m given the chance to have more time to prepare for it. If I did plea guilty I would be more restricted with rights and I’d prefer to have a year or more to prepare than risk getting serious sentencing. I could have a higher chance of winning the trial. Plus, I could have the possibility of not getting incarcerated if I win the trial.
In conclusion, plea bargains and Brady rights have a big role in the lives of criminals because it can affect them in such ways if they accept that they are guilty. Plea bargains can have certain benefits even if they restrict some rights. When the defendant pleads guilty their punishment is in the hands of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many of these rights are considered crucial to the accurate determination of guilt and punishment at trial, so the absence of these protections may undermine our confidence in that determination. This may be of concern in the capital context because although defendants who plead guilty avoid the risk of execution, they still receive very lengthy sentences—typically life imprisonment. The threat of the death penalty has also induced innocent defendants to plead guilty (and even falsely implicate others) to avoid execution. Finally, the study of the plea-negotiation process in the capital context permits us to gain a better understanding of the financial and administrative costs of capital punishment to states and the federal government. Capital trials are extremely expensive, and they rarely reduce prison costs because of the…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Modern Capital Punishment

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When a question of how to go about serving justice with capital punishment arises we look at it from a logical standpoint. We do not go ahead with an extreme and irrational approach and say, Jeffery Dahmer had serval victims thus meaning Dahmer and some of his family members must be executed several times. It is a childish way of trying to serve justice. Being a serial killer and taking sole responsibility, only Jeffery Dahmer deserve to be executed for his…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Say you didn’t want to plead guilty because you know you are innocent, you would then enter a plea of “not guilty”. Then the case would have to go to trial. Had you simply plead guilty to begin with, the judge would have sentenced you without the drawn out process of trials. Plea bargains are a faster way for the courts to get through all of the cases that they must filter through. In relation to due process rights however, plea bargaining is often used erroneously.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The prosecutor must believe that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt even before it goes to trial. They are supposed to be trained to balance fairness and decency. Unfortunately, that is not always the case. Prosecutor misconduct occurs when in the course of their duties they act in ways that are unethical and illegal. Withholding evidence, witness tampering, introduction of false evidence and improper closing arguments are just a few of the tactics used by prosecutors to ensure that they win their conviction.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Imposing The Death Penalty

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The death penalty and its use as punishment often has a whole lot of controversy whether it should be allowed or not. The reason is, the death penalty is not a minor issue like the use of school uniforms, lowering the drinking age, or legalizing gay marriage. This controversial issue is substantial because it’s about giving someone who commits capital crime the punishment of execution. Many often argue that it simply does not serve justice. In contrast, many people believe that it should be a consequence to one’s wrongful actions, serve justice, and can prevent the death of innocent lives in the future.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    2. Type of punishment needed by dangerous criminals. There are those criminals who do not fear be imprisoned after which they will redo the crime over and over again but through the…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargain Essay

    • 1331 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Consequences the defendant faces are even more gregarious with the involvement of “trial penalty” or the threatening to seek the most severe penalty if the defendant exercises their right to trial. Society as a whole faces the moral consequence that plea bargains sometimes place the innocent behind bars in fear of what they would lose if they did not plead guilty and were assigned a…

    • 1331 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Advantages

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plea bargaining is an agreement made between the prosecution and the defense that allows the defendant to receive a lesser charge for their crimes if they plead guilty. The prosecution often offers the defendant a reduced sentence. Most of the time, “the defendant agrees to plead guilty in order to avoid a trial and a more severe sentence” (Rennison and Dodge 204). When the defendant agrees to a plea bargain they agree to give up some of their constitutional rights including, the right to a jury and the right to appeal their case. In the American legal system, plea bargaining is very popular and is used to resolve around 90% of criminal cases (Plea Bargains: In Depth).…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is plea bargaining? To some individuals this is an easy way out for the criminals who have committed the crimes that they are charged for but all in all the criminal is receiving some type of punishment that gives a small glimpse into their future. May not be the sentence the families of the victim or victims, the prosecutor, or the public society were hoping for. Throughout this paper, I will be sharing some knowledge of Plea Bargaining. Before the suspect is even offered the plea bargain, the pretrial has begun to hear the indictment and allow the defendant to enter a plea.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Convicting habitual criminals who are receiving capital punishment is one thing, for they have no control of what the outcome will be once the crime has been commited. When it comes to exposing their sentencing to the general public, however, is a different story. When a person is exposed to the general public, the mind of a person begins to change. In this case, emebarrassment and shame has a tendency to deter a person from committing crimes like capital murder or premediated murder by the direct and indirect emotions of others, for being exposed to the general public’s emotions has the tendency to deter them from being part of an act more rapidly than any law that’s implemented (Brown and Eshensen, 2012). When one encounters dencial in the form of facial reactions, the perpetrator has the ability to take the situation more seriously since they are encountering the circumstance first hand.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays