Plea Bargaining Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Review: In 1975, Attorney General, Avrum Gross, declared a prohibition on plea-bargaining in Alaska. Michael Rubinstein and Teresa J. White from National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice were assigned to study the impact of Gross’s decision. Their first task was looking at whether the policy had been carried out by the courts in Alaska, and second, was what the effects were on Alaska’s criminal justice system. This involved conducting 400 interviews of the surrounding judges in Alaska and collecting information from 3,586 case files. Overall their goal was to create a detailed description of the Alaska system during the “before and after” years.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When on the assignment and after watching the documentary, I have concluded that it’s way more than just about being guilty or not. For example Patsy Kelly who from her story was caught up on vacation with a friend guy who decided to go into a convenient store and kill the clerk she had no clue about what was going on so she say, she eventually was arrested ,took the plea deal and also did the time. Furthermore, I now understand that a plea is a bargain when considering current circumstances concerning weather or not you serve a shorter sentence or get…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Plea Bargaining ought to be abolished in the United States criminal justice system. The reason for this is because it is unconstitutional, unethical, and immoral. Firstly, it is unconstitutional as it requires offenders to waive the rights guaranteed by the 5th and 6th amendments: the right to a jury trial, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to confront witnesses. Additionally, plea bargaining is unethical as it allows criminals to evade accepting responsibility for crimes they have committed.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Plea bargaining is right and proper and should be continued. In the United States plea bargaining is considered an essential part of the criminal justice system (Terrill, 2013, p. 82). I consider plea bargaining a necessary evil. With overwhelming court dockets, a plea bargain allows the prosecutor to streamline the court docket as well as minimizing costs (Savitsky, 2009, p. 9). It would be impossible and take entirely too much time to take every case to trial.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plea Bargain Advantages

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A plea bargain is when the defendant in a criminal trial agrees to plead guilty in the exchange of a lesser sentence or to have other charges dropped. In theory, a plea bargain is a way to speed up the courtroom process. When applied correctly plea bargains are excellent tools within the criminal justice system. Incorrectly used judgment is cast down from those outside of the criminal justice system.…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A bar shooting in Florida, for instance, could have easily been prevented had plea bargaining not been utilized in the shooter’s case previously. 19-year-old Jamee Husband had been convicted of armed robbery once in his teens, but because he pled guilty, he was let off after a short stint in jail. He was even allowed to purchase a gun after this incident (Doudrick). By receiving a shorter punishment, Husband was not deterred from repeating the crime because of the lack of severe consequences. Another situation that emulates the “less punishment, more repetition of crime” is child abuse.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The numerical evidence for plea bargaining in the juvenile…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being in law enforcement for several years I come across several suspects and defendants who expresses the criminal justice process moves like a snail and is always unpredictable. Imagine if a significant amount of cases was going to trial instead of over 90% of felony cases are plea bargained (Bohm, R., Haley, K.,n.d). Nevertheless, there are three types of plea bargains and prosecutors tend to have factors to decide if the plea bargain is in the best interest or what’s the better plea bargain to make depending on the situation. The first example, a defendant might plead guilty to trespass and a misdemeanor vandalism charge instead of burglary charge because burglary carries felony charges.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around 95 percent of cases are plea bargained. Without plea bargaining, the court system would be drowning in cases and the right to a speedy trial under the 6th amendment would be virtually impossible. The court system in the United States is already overloaded with cases waiting to be heard, and the added cases resulting in the elimination of plea bargaining would be catastrophic for the criminal justice system. What plea bargaining does is allow the prosecutor to offer a lesser charge and, in turn, the defendant waives their right to a trial. It allows the court system to move along faster and deal with the offenders who commit more serious, heinous crimes.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the 1960’s the number of crimes in the United States have drastically increased. Each year the number of crimes increase due to advancements in technology and through enhanced media attention that killers receive. In fact there are so many crimes occurring currently in the United States that many criminals or suspects plead guilty in order to save money and time that would be spent during a trial. The concept of pleading guilty in order to save time and money is called plea bargaining. A plea bargain is any agreement in a criminal case between the prosecutor and defendant where the defendant agrees to plead guilty to a particular charge in return for some concession from the prosecutor.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The advantages of plea bargains is having the ability to have a lighter sentence for the defendant only if they plead guilty. Another advantages is having the defendant have the charges reduced, by pleading guilty to a misdemeanor instead of a felony. As there is advantages, it has many disadvantages to this bargain, it removes the right to a trial by a jury. The constitutional states that everyone has a right to a trial, it can be seen illegal to plea bargaining. Judges don’t have to follow the plea bargain agreement.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When less severe crimes receive the same or similarly harsh punishments as more serious or felonious crimes it creates an inequality within the courtroom. Removing plea bargaining would show results similar to the case from 1975 in Alaska where the Attorney General forbade prosecutors from plea bargaining with offenders. The results from this occurrence showed that the punishments for violent and felonious crimes did not change, but the punishments for less serious offenses and misdemeanors where dramatically increased (Rubinstein & White, 1978). The inequality created from the removal of plea bargaining would have drastic effects on the criminal justice system where the punishment for less serious crimes would be severely punishable but would have little to no effect on felonies and crimes of a violent nature. In the case from Alaska the primary objective was to hinder plea bargaining for the more serious offenders yet the outcome would eliminate the discretionary decision making of the courts and would lead to first time offenders of smaller crimes receiving unequal punishments for their crimes and reduced probability for parole (Rubinstein & White, 1978).…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Issues

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Introduction Plea bargaining according to Meridian-Webster dictionary (2015), is defined as a process in which a person who is accused of a crime and is allowed to the he or she is guilty of a less serious crime in order to be given a less severe punishment. Once a defendant enters a plea bargain they are not allowed to recant their plea. This process can be initiated by both the prosecutor and the defense attorney. If a defendant’s lawyer offers the plea bargain to the prosecutor and it is accepted, it is a win for the defense. A prosecutor’s plea is usually one that is not accepted at first.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The advent of plea bargaining in the legal system in the past century has rendered the classic "trial" virtually obsolete. Plea bargaining1 is a crucial feature of our criminal justice system, as approximately 95% of convictions that occur within a year of arrest are obtained by a guilty plea. For at least a century, the institution of plea bargaining' has been a central feature of the American system of criminal justice. In September 203, the Justice Department again revised its guidelines regarding plea bargains. Lawyers and non-lawyers alike have generally assumed that the reason for this is the enormous size of the case load in relation to the available legal personnel.…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The criminal justice system should consider reducing mandatory minimums, increasing resources for public defenders and administer a magistrate as an arbiter to balance the power between both parties. Reducing mandatory minimums allow the defendant to pursue a fair trial. Prosecutors use mandatory minimums to pressure the defendant to take a plea bargain deal, where additional charges may be added if the defendant elects to go to trial. Many critics are now questioning whether prosecutors are properly trained of charging the defendants a fair sentence rather than…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays