The Importance Of The Insanity Plea

Superior Essays
The insanity plea is a defense in the court of law put in place for people who suffer from mental illness and commit crimes. Under this defense, the mentally ill are not entirely held responsible for their actions given the terms that they were not in the correct state of mind when the crime took place. The person would admit to committing the crime, but then say they are not guilty by reason of insanity (Francone). This plea has been used in my cases throughout history. The presence of this plea option has led to controversy in the law world; some think that the plea should be diminished while others notice its necessity. Nevertheless, there are people with mental illness in our society that commit crimes just as those without mental illness do. There should be a system that protects the rights of those with mental illness, but there is a lot of grey area with the current system in place because it is difficult to tell if the person was not in a sane state at the time the crime took place when the trial often occurs months later. Those who plea guilty by reason of insanity are required to go through an extensive psychological …show more content…
The insanity plea is a necessary modality for the legal system to possess; however there are many holes in the current defense that have caused criminals to find an escape, and because of this, there should be stricter stipulations in place on the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To the contrary, the legal definition shows that it is a very serious mental illness and cannot just be thrown around. This change in definition helps the reader to better understand the verdicts and helps them to see the legal system in a logical way. In this particular case, the lawyers that Dr. Lunde was testifying against were trying to use the insanity plea in order to protect their client when in reality it was just hurting them and making them appear desperate. Dr. Lunde’s words on the topic unveil some of the cheats used in the legal…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    HISTORY: The jury returned a verdict of not guilty on the ground of insanity. As a policy matter the House of Lords sought clarification on the insanity defense from the Court of Common Pleas. ISSUE: Should an insane defendant who did not know the nature of his act, or did not…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rubina Khan Hour 2 10-14-15 The Tell Tale Heart: Insanity Plea Judge Type: Defense Attorney There were two men in this story. Both men are best friends. One man has a very large eye. His eye is like a vulture’s eye.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mrs. Andrea Yates past life showed that she has had a history of mental illness. Mrs. Andrea Yates had been brought to the hospital many times for strings of mental cases that she had received treatment for because she had harsh depression and the depression came due to psychosis. One time when Yates was in the hospital, she was described as an intensely psychotic woman. Yates has tried many times to commit suicide; for instance one time she tried to overdose by using antidepressants and even after that did not work she attempted to murder herself by stabbing herself. Yates has been through unfavorable paranoia.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Mr Williams Insane

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mr. Williams’s Insanity Case According to the National Alliance on Mental Illness, out of the estimated 2,220,300 people locked up in jails and detention facilities in the US only 17% of the inmates that need mental help receive it. Therefore, there is a remainder of 83% of inmates that need mental help but don't receive it. This is an issue because all of these inmates could be considered legally insane. This matters because with just being able to prove that the inmate is insane they could be let out on the insanity plea to be able to receive the treatment that they need. To prove this you must be able to show that the person confuses fantasy with reality, he/she cannot control their impulses due to psychosis, and they have or portray…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Article Review: The insanity Plea in the Case of a Serial Killer What is this article specifically addressing? This article, “The insanity Plea in the Case of a Serial Killer” By George Palermo and Richard Khnudten explains the case of the infamous serial killer Jeffery Dahmer and his attempt to request the insanity plea to get out of his crimes he committed. Mr. Dahmer killed seventeen men, and when asked about his crimes his responses where clear and coherent.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, the insanity defense is a defense that is rarely used and rarely successful, but receives the most attention from media. In order to successfully use the insanity defense, the defendant must be judged legally insane, which consequently strips them from many of their political rights. The principle behind the insanity defense states that a person who lacks the mental capacity to form decisions based on right or wrong cannot be held legally responsible for their criminal acts. Each state varies in the legal standards that determine the sanity of defendants. Andrea Yates, was charged for capital murder in 2002 for drowning all five of her children.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first myth regarding the overuse of the insanity defense is derived from Television due to it being the only medium with consistent frequency. My father, who faces something similar, is a Detective with the Police specializing in their ID section working on forensic science for murders and robberies. The science surrounding fingerprints has been widely accepted with no two humans ever being recorded to share the same fingerprint. However, when the prosecution calls someone like my father to the stand, jurors are becoming less impressed. What’s known as the “CSI Effect” explains that due to increase amount of shows such as CSI, jurors expect to see more evidence as shown on TV.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pleading guilty by reason of insanity is an interesting topic. On one hand you have a person that may or may not be in the right state of mind when the crime was committed. On the other hand you have individuals and defense attorneys that try to use this plea to get a lesser punishment. This topic has sparked many debates in and out of courtrooms decade after decade. In the last century there have been many tests developed to test a person’s sanity.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Not Guilty by reason of insanity” This could be used in a plea in a court of a person charged with a crime who admits the act, but whose attorney says that they were too mentally ill at the time to determine whether it was right or wrong. In the short story, “The Tell Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe it describes a crazy man who kills another man. The story takes place in an old house in the old man’s bedroom. The main character explains to the reader about his obsession of the old man. His obsession is concerning the old man’s “vulture looking” eye.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Typically, restricted to state circumstances, the M'Naghten Rule is the proper method for examining legal insanity. The test concentrates on the individual’s capability of not knowing what they were doing or that their actions were wrong. In order for the M’Naghten Rule to prove insanity FindLaw.com explains the rule as “The M'Naghten Rule (or test) focuses on whether a criminal defendant knew the nature of the crime or understood right from wrong” (“The M'Naghten Rule”). Hence, if the perpetrator was not able to distinguish their actions from right and wrong, then, under those circumstances, they cannot be held accountable for the crime. Alternately, the plea is pursued to lessen the severity of the verdict and to be followed up with psychotherapy.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “All men have impulses, but society demands that you resist them or face the consequences”(Collins 1). Society does not agree with the idea of the insanity plea. Every action has a consequence. Anyone who commits a crime has some mental issue, but a psychologist will determine if the defendant could be helped in a mental hospital. If one could not be helped he would be sentenced to jail.…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Their proof must show that the accused has criminal liability, accountability, or culpability (Pg. 255). In the absence of one or both of the attributes the insanity may be used. To begin with, as stated by Torry and Billick, the insanity defense was used as far back as 1581 when there was a legal note in place for those who could distinguish the difference between right and wrong and those who could not (Pg. 256). By the Eighteenth Century the insanity defense was distinguished by, if the accused could only understand the ramifications of what he had done like an infant or even a wild animal would, then he would not be held responsible for said crime. Today, however, the law uses several different rules, including the M’Naghten rule, to determine if person’s mental state during the act of committing the crime was such that he will use the insanity defense.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays