The Principle Behind The Insanity Defense

Improved Essays
For example, the insanity defense is a defense that is rarely used and rarely successful, but receives the most attention from media. In order to successfully use the insanity defense, the defendant must be judged legally insane, which consequently strips them from many of their political rights. The principle behind the insanity defense states that a person who lacks the mental capacity to form decisions based on right or wrong cannot be held legally responsible for their criminal acts. Each state varies in the legal standards that determine the sanity of defendants. Andrea Yates, was charged for capital murder in 2002 for drowning all five of her children. In 2006 Yates was acquitted after jurors found her not guilty by reason of insanity.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On July 26, 2006, the Texas jury in her retrial found that Yates was not guilty by reason of insanity. She was consequently committed by the court to the North Texas State Hospital, Vernon Campus. She in the hospital watching the video of her children when she murdered them. Obviously her mental health issues are severe.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrea Yates Case Study

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrea Yates was a previous Houston, Texas occupant who executed her five kids on June 20, 2001 by suffocating them in the bathtub in her home. She was found guilty of first degree murder and sentenced to life, but a court of appeals reversed the conviction and found her insane. She had been languishing over some time with extremely serious post pregnancy anxiety and baby blues psychosis. Her case put the M'Naghten Rules with the Irresistible Impulse Test, a lawful test for rational soundness, under close open examination in the United States. Yates' 2002 conviction of capital murder and sentence to life in jail with the likelihood of parole following 40 years was later toppled on request.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To the contrary, the legal definition shows that it is a very serious mental illness and cannot just be thrown around. This change in definition helps the reader to better understand the verdicts and helps them to see the legal system in a logical way. In this particular case, the lawyers that Dr. Lunde was testifying against were trying to use the insanity plea in order to protect their client when in reality it was just hurting them and making them appear desperate. Dr. Lunde’s words on the topic unveil some of the cheats used in the legal…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Image your son is suffering from schizophrenia disorder and he does something that is illegal. Now imagine your son goes to court is found guilty and has to go prison, even though he had no understand of what he did. Eric Clark was a boy who suffered from schizophrenia. He went to court because he shot a police officer. He had no idea what he had done was wrong because he was having delusions.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Serial Killers Essay

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited

    According to law, a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” if they do not have the capacity to know right from wrong, therefore;…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malingering (Faking) the Insanity Defense The story at the beginning of this paper illustrates this issue well, even though, it is quite uncommon. Studies have shown that about 82% of insanity defendants have been diagnosed with major medical illnesses. So, what about the 18% that were not diagnosed with a mental illness? Could it be that they were faking it the whole time?…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In January of 2005, Yates's conviction was overturned when the courts learned that Dr. Park Dietz, a prosecution psychiatrist, had made a false statement on the stand Dr. Dietz had claimed that Yates could have gotten the idea to kill her children and feign mental illness from an episode of Law and Order. However, that episode had never aired and there were some things that was exaggerated during the testimony. The appeals court felt that the false testimony could have influenced the jury's perception of the case (Kesling, 2006). Although the psychiatrist that testified for the prosecution made false testimony about the state of mind of Yates, other psychiatrists say that she was completely when she decided to kill her children on that day (Parker, 2006).…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was also clear the insanity plea was inappropriate…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This verdict can often be mistaken for the defence of diminished responsibility / capacity despite there being many major differences between the two. Although both are there to be used by mentally ill defendants, reason of insanity is a full defense to a crime and diminished responsibility / capacity is not. Pleading not guilty by reason of insanity is essentially equivalent to pleading not guilty, diminished responsibility / capacity is however just the defendant pleading to a lesser crime, the fact they are mentally ill is used as a mitigating factor. The law presumes that every person has free will, is responsible for their actions and should therefore be punished in accordance with the seriousness of their crime.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Defense History

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For centuries, criminals have been categorized as insane, but does that justify their crime? The majority of higher profile criminals file for the insanity plea which then affects their punishment and life, causing us to consider if ours is safe. The insanity defense should not be admissible in court because of the interest for the public, increases in legal costs, and manipulation of the legal system. The insanity defense’s history plays into our everyday legal actions and in order to understand the problem, you need to understand the defense.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Not Guilty by reason of insanity” This could be used in a plea in a court of a person charged with a crime who admits the act, but whose attorney says that they were too mentally ill at the time to determine whether it was right or wrong. In the short story, “The Tell Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe it describes a crazy man who kills another man. The story takes place in an old house in the old man’s bedroom. The main character explains to the reader about his obsession of the old man. His obsession is concerning the old man’s “vulture looking” eye.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jrank points out that many people have misconceptions about the insanity defense. One of these misconceptions is that it is used more often than it actually is. The defense is only attempted in about one percent of all criminal cases, and only twenty percent of these attempts actually win their cases (Jrank 1). One thing that people do not think about is that when a defendant pleads insanity they are admitting their guilt; because of this if they do not win their plea they will automatically be given a guilty verdict. They could also receive a more severe punishment for trying to go through with an insanity defense if they are found to be free of any type of mental illness.…

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Case Of Andrea Yates

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The case of Andrea Yates is one of the most infamous cases in the last decade and the reason for that is because Andrea’s mental state leading up to the murders. Andrea Yates in 2001 drowned all five of her children in a bathtub in her Huston, Texas home. However, was she responsible for her actions? Andrea suffered from several mental illnesses including postpartum depression. She was constantly in and out of mental health institutions and was given medication to deal with her depression.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Andrea Yates had a strong personal reasoning to the homicide charges brought against her for killing her children. The primary defense expert, Dr. Resnick, had a belief that Andrea killed her children because in her mind she thought she was saving them from going to hell. If the delusions that she was having existed, and imagining that those delusions represent reality, then Andrea was justified in her actions. But, if she were accountable for the delusions that she was having and knew that they would lead to harming the children, then she would not be justified in her actions (Slobogin, C., 2002). The evidence that was presented at trial implied that Andrea, before the act had been committed, had concealed her psychotic symptoms and delusions from her therapist and was not taking her medication, and she knew when she did not take her medicine that her delusional thoughts to kill her children would get worse (Slobogin, C., 2002).…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays