Torry And Billick: The Insanity Defense

Superior Essays
A person’s life has been heinously taken due to no fault of their own. Family and friends of the deceased have mourned, children have lost a parent, parents lost a child, and wives lost a husband. There is no way to ease their pain but, all they want is justice but, will they get it? When the murderer is finally caught the family is elated with joy and anticipate justice will prevail. But, there’s a catch, as the suspect’s defense attorney is claiming he was insane at the time the crime was committed and intends to plead just that. The insanity defense has been around for centuries and has always been the center of debate.
According to Zachary D. Torry and Stephen B. Billick (2007), a crime must have two key attributes evil intent (mens rea)
…show more content…
Their proof must show that the accused has criminal liability, accountability, or culpability (Pg. 255). In the absence of one or both of the attributes the insanity may be used. To begin with, as stated by Torry and Billick, the insanity defense was used as far back as 1581 when there was a legal note in place for those who could distinguish the difference between right and wrong and those who could not (Pg. 256). By the Eighteenth Century the insanity defense was distinguished by, if the accused could only understand the ramifications of what he had done like an infant or even a wild animal would, then he would not be held responsible for said crime. Today, however, the law uses several different rules, including the M’Naghten rule, to determine if person’s mental state during the act of committing the crime was such that he will use the insanity defense.
Authors Larry Siegel and John Worrell, The M’Naghten rule, enacted in 1843, deems a person insane if, “at the time she committed the act she stands
…show more content…
Laura Stampler, of Time magazine (2014), ways that Slender man is a mythical creature depicted as exceedingly tall, thin, arms hanging at the knee, and a white face with no eye, ears, nose, or mouth. The myth tells of a man, “who stalks, abducts, and psychologically terrorizes people—particularly children” (Pg. 1). There is a free downloadable Slender Man game online that anyone can play and is widely known as the game that makes grown men cry. It begins by having the player walk through computer generated woods while slow, bass, and spine-chilling music plays in the background. You can vary your walking speed in the game but, be forewarned if your speed isn’t perfect slender man will APPEAR so SUDDENLY with a blast of doomed music you will scream where you sit and opt never play the game again. Unfortunately, as NBC News reported in 2015, these two twelve year old girls from Wisconsin chose to play Slender Man and then they chose to go out make the game real by luring a fellow student into the woods, stabbing her nineteen times. The victim managed to survive the attack by crawling out of the woods and collapsing on a sidewalk where she was later found and taken to the hospital. One of the girls has been deemed mentally incompetent to stand trial. Some of her behavior during questioning includes her saying, she

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Andrea Yates: Mother or Monster Mothers have been thought of as nurturing caregivers. Caregivers who have always done and thought of what is best for their children. Nevertheless, what happens when the nurturing mother becomes the monster? What causes them to undergo such a drastic transformation?…

    • 2451 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ultimately, only a jury can decide the issue of insanity, which in itself may be the most controversial aspect about the insanity defense. In other words, people who have no training in the field, rarely come into contact with the mentally ill and have a minimal understanding of the issues involved, make legal, long-lasting judgments that are frequently based on shifting criteria. If he were to be denied the opportunity to use the defense, there would need to be a secondary set of defenses which allow the charges against him to be greatly mitigated. The team would have to consider accepting a plea to lessen the time he would ultimately be incarcerated. It would be unfavorable but because of the fact that there was actus reus but lacked mens rea, it would be hard to get him not have him serve any time at…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays
    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the mental disorder or defect causes impairment in the person’s ability to appreciate or control their behavior, which then results in the criminal offense. It is important to recognize that the mere coexistence of a mental disorder and a criminal offense does not prove insanity; you have to be able to show the direct connection of how the disorder or defect influenced or caused the criminal…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever wondered why people have not pleaded guilty for a crime that they committed? According to the article, High Court Reviews Insanity-Defense Case, we can argue to ways in which we either believe that insanity plea should be allowed in the court or not. This article was written and debated in 2006. The author is Nina Totenberg. This article is about Eric Clark and how he pleaded in the court of Arizona.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “About half of the states follow the “M’Naughten” rule.” “A defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if “If at the time of committing the act, he was laboring under such a defect of reason…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The three legal standards of insanity are the M’Naghten Rule, the Brawner Rule, and the Durham Rule. The M’Naghten Rule was introduced in 1843. It requires that it must be proven, with no doubt, that the person who committed the crime, was not able to understand what they were doing at the time they were doing the act. Or, if they were aware of what they were doing, they must not have been able to understand that it was wrong.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “You must plead insanity. You must give the jury a way out. You must show them a way to find him not guilty if they are so inclined. If they’re sympathetic, if they want to acquit, you must provide them with a defense they can use to do it. It makes no difference if they believe the insanity crap.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, in many countries including England and Wales if someone is considered to be insane they cannot commit a crime freely, so a punishment should not follow. When a person is medically insane they cannot voluntarily commit an act…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity plea is a necessary modality for the legal system to possess; however there are many holes in the current defense that have caused criminals to find an escape, and because of this, there should be stricter stipulations in place on the…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Here’s an example; A man went to a party to get revenge on someone and was going to shoot them, but other party goers stepped in the way to protect the person he was trying to shoot. The man had shot them and they died, he might then think “no witnesses” and kill everyone else at the party. When this case is taken to court, this man could be charged for manslaughter. If he pleads innocent on the account that he wasn’t thinking straight and couldn’t tell right from wrong due to a mental illness, he may be given less time in prison and psychological treatment, but no one would want a mass murderer to get a shorter sentence, for all they know he might have only pleaded insanity to escape a longer sentence. The…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American society's view is causing this law to be on the verge of being abolished. From the creation of the insanity defense, American society’s view on whether the insanity defense should be kept has been split. Before the insanity defense was developed there…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In both cases, the insanity defense is applicable to acquit the criminal at hand. In Sickles’ case, Sickle was “one of the first defendants in American history to utilize an insanity defense. (B)” The insanity defense is one of the only resources that a defense attorney is able to use during a trial. An insanity defense is “a plea that defendants are not guilty because they lacked the mental capacity to realize that they committed a wrong or appreciate why it was wrong.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However over the years the insanity defense has not been successful and needs to be taken away…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays