The Insanity Defense Of Pleading Guilty

Decent Essays
Pleading guilty by reason of insanity is an interesting topic. On one hand you have a person that may or may not be in the right state of mind when the crime was committed. On the other hand you have individuals and defense attorneys that try to use this plea to get a lesser punishment. This topic has sparked many debates in and out of courtrooms decade after decade. In the last century there have been many tests developed to test a person’s sanity. These tests include the M’Naghten test, irresistible impulse test, Durham test, and American Law Institute test. Even after the development of these tests there is still criticism of the insanity defense because the law itself is based on the notion that everyone has free will (Comer, 2014,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To the contrary, the legal definition shows that it is a very serious mental illness and cannot just be thrown around. This change in definition helps the reader to better understand the verdicts and helps them to see the legal system in a logical way. In this particular case, the lawyers that Dr. Lunde was testifying against were trying to use the insanity plea in order to protect their client when in reality it was just hurting them and making them appear desperate. Dr. Lunde’s words on the topic unveil some of the cheats used in the legal…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Serial Killers Essay

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited

    According to law, a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” if they do not have the capacity to know right from wrong, therefore;…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This Court will have to allow this defense because in Arizona 's limited insanity defense in Clark v. Arizona, and denied certiorari in Delling v. Idaho, a case alleging that Idaho 's replacement of the insanity defense with a "Guilty but mentally ill" verdict constitutes a due process violation. Because of the weighty implications of the decision to plead insanity, the defendant must be the one to decide whether to use the insanity…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, Judge Awotwi, presided over the mock trial State Prosecution vs. Macbeth, and it is my duty to uphold the rule of law and instruct true justice upon this issue. The defendant entered a plea of insanity due to delusional compulsion before this court on October 24, 2017, after committing beyond a doubt one count of murder and two counts of felony murder. The question is not whether Macbeth committed these crimes, or if he is judged to be found guilty; it is to judge if the defendant “did not have [the] mental capacity to distinguish between right and wrong”, and that is the responsibility of the court (16-3-2). Due to the facts presented in court I have come to a verdict. The defense’s unique argument and main points overwhelmed the predominant…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the mental disorder or defect causes impairment in the person’s ability to appreciate or control their behavior, which then results in the criminal offense. It is important to recognize that the mere coexistence of a mental disorder and a criminal offense does not prove insanity; you have to be able to show the direct connection of how the disorder or defect influenced or caused the criminal…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some people are up against the concept of insanity defense where they believe everyone who commits crime must take the criminal responsibility for their deviant behavior. On the other hand, there are group of people who believe the NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system, in order to sustain the equality for mentally ill person. Thus, the question of whether NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system is not a black or white question where there is a clear answer. However, the truth is that the NCRMD defense has created in our criminal justice system with a good purpose of providing equal rights for the mentally disordered people. This criminal defense does not exists and works as the sink hole for the accused to easily escape or avoid his or her criminal responsibility.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sociopathy Vs Psychopathy

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The problem associated with this is that fact that because of this the standards to claim insanity were easier to do with the DSM than by the PCL-R. The DSM is what is more commonly used in Frye Jurisdictions. This evidence shows the unequal advantage of how the simplicity of what jurisdiction and individual is in can show significant impact on…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity plea is a necessary modality for the legal system to possess; however there are many holes in the current defense that have caused criminals to find an escape, and because of this, there should be stricter stipulations in place on the…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Not Guilty by reason of insanity” This could be used in a plea in a court of a person charged with a crime who admits the act, but whose attorney says that they were too mentally ill at the time to determine whether it was right or wrong. In the short story, “The Tell Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe it describes a crazy man who kills another man. The story takes place in an old house in the old man’s bedroom. The main character explains to the reader about his obsession of the old man. His obsession is concerning the old man’s “vulture looking” eye.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In our society today, the insanity defense starts a dispute seeing that those found not guilty by reason of insanity are treated leniently. A sane person who commits the same crime as an “insane” person could commit a horrible crime such as murder under the impression of a hallucination and can be sent to a mental hospital for a year then released and expected to be healthy. A sane person commits murder, same as insane person, would result in prison for five plus years. At least the mentally ill criminal would be getting help by nurses who care the patients well being. Resulting in lenientcy.…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Case Of Andrea Yates

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Texas uses a combination of the McNaughton and Irresistible Impulse Test. On the McNaughton test the defendant must be suffering from a defect or disease of the mind, not be aware of what they did it or whether it was right or wrong to be found insane. However, on the Irresistible Impulse Test if a defendant is cognitively aware of what they did was right and wrong , but cannot stop themselves from acting a certain way they can be found insane. Some psychiatrists and legal scholars have criticized both tests for failing to allow for degrees of incapacity. The presence of postpartum psychosis may significantly impair a woman 's mental stability but still not satisfy the cognitive test or even the irresistible-impulse test (Nau, McNiel, & Binder, 2012) .…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were many different aspects in this chapter that I found to be very interesting for me. I was very surprised at the number for people who plead “insanity” was at a staggering less than 1%. I often here of people trying to beat many charges and plan on pleading the insanity plea. I believe that the actual number of people who claim insanity may be scared out of sticking to that plea. I have always thought that pleading insanity will get you less time just in a mental institution; when in fact it would result in a longer stay compared to one at a prison.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However over the years the insanity defense has not been successful and needs to be taken away…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays