Why Is Plea Bargaining Effective

Improved Essays
Around 95 percent of cases are plea bargained. Without plea bargaining, the court system would be drowning in cases and the right to a speedy trial under the 6th amendment would be virtually impossible. The court system in the United States is already overloaded with cases waiting to be heard, and the added cases resulting in the elimination of plea bargaining would be catastrophic for the criminal justice system. What plea bargaining does is allow the prosecutor to offer a lesser charge and, in turn, the defendant waives their right to a trial. It allows the court system to move along faster and deal with the offenders who commit more serious, heinous crimes. This is why plea bargains are a good thing and should be kept in the criminal justice system. While they are not …show more content…
In fact, it has its problem areas. While it does keep the court system flowing more easily, it also allows for some discrimination against certain persons. Those who are innocent may feel pressured to plea in order to avoid the risk of trial. They fear that a trial court will find them guilty and that they will get a harsher punishment than if they just take the plea. Those who are poverty-stricken may be more likely to plea because they cannot afford to go to trial. Legal fees can be incredibly expensive and it is often easier for those who are poor and in tight situations. Those who are of a colored-race may feel the need to plea bargain because they feel the trial will be discriminatory. That is, if they are even offered a plea bargain because findings say that those who are black and Hispanic have a less likely chance to be offered a plea bargain. Lastly, those who are the victims of defendants who plea bargain may feel as though their offender got away with it. They never get the chance to have a trial jury or judge hear how the crime impacted their life and why they believe the defendant should get a harsher

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Section A: Patrick Free was a suspect in the murder case of Adam Suopys in New Jersey. He was taken into custody at 5:18 p.m on 1/8/98 where he received relentless interrogation for seventeen hours straight. He was kept in a small room and was not offered any food or water throughout the duration of the interrogation which lasted over the entire night. He was questioned by up to four interrogators at the same time.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defense counsels started to feel that defendants will not be able to pay for the time involved to go to trial, but the prosecutors feel even though they work harder at a trial they are not having to decide on a sentence in a plea bargain. The judges now have the burden to determine and announce all sentences to defendants. The ban on plea bargaining did not affect the sentences of violent crime charges, but it did drastically change the sentences of Felony 3 guilty outcomes. The defendants convicted of burglary, larceny and destruction of property found themselves receiving longer sentences.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining most often takes place before the beginning of a trial. It is the process by which the defendant and the prosecution work out a conclusion to the case, subject to court approval. For the prosecutor, the purpose of plea bargaining is to ensure a defendant gets punishment. For the defense, it is a way to get a lesser charge than if the case were to go to…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plea Bargain Advantages

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    When a defendant agrees to plead guilty the time spent on what would have been their trial can now be devoted to another defendant. When a defendant takes advantage of a plea deal, they are often granted leniency on their punishment compared to what they might have received if the case went to trial. An advantage for the prosecutor is not gambling the case in court and risk the case being dismissed, or the defendant found not guilty. Another benefit that plea bargains offer is saving the victim from testifying in court. Psychologically, testifying in court could be very traumatizing to the…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Making it much harder for a guilty plea to be tossed. This also brings into question his or her creditability, changing your statement after some time to think about it may seem odd to some. Changing a plea is easier done by the defendant, if he or she has favorable evidence against the prosecutors case. This evidence may be the lack of creditability the prosecutors main witness, DNA evidence or something that can confirm his or her…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining is a widely used tool to wrap up cases quickly and efficiently. However, there is going to be no plea bargaining in a case when a defendant is not rewarded for pleading guilty. There is no incentive in pleading guilty when you are going to receive a sizeable prison sentence regardless of whether you admit to committing the crime or not. Trials are costly procedures and it would save the Canadian taxpayers a substantial amount of money if the trial could be averted. Mandatory minimum sentencing instead plays a direct role in expanding the number of cases that will go to trial (Frost, 2006).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judge has the power to accept or deny the plea deal, and part of this process is to deny sentences that stray too far from the Sentencing Guidelines. Kosman writes that it is even encouraged for the prosecutor, defendant, and judge to agree to a plea sentence “explicitly calculated according to guidelines” (Kosman 806). Federal district courts that have denied these motions for sentence modifications, and federal circuit appellate courts that have upheld such rulings based on assumptions of the plea sentence and the per se rule have clearly demonstrated the overall trouble plea bargains have caused defendants. While plea bargains have clearly not been the best deal for defendants who are often first-time offenders, such a high rate of cases ending in plea bargains demonstrates the ubiquity and power of the practice in the American criminal system. This facet, combined with the disparity in crack cocaine sentencing has produced even more unjust outcomes for defendants who were offered sentence reductions by the Sentencing Commission, and reflects the harsh reality of plea bargains in the American criminal…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evidence Interpretation

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages

    With lacking evidence, detectives and prosecutors choose the most likely suspect, however; this is not always liable as from time to time, the individual in question is not guilty. There have been cases over the years where innocent defendants are coerced into confession during questioning; confession evidence can be quite compelling in front of the judge and jury (Braithwaite, 2012). Furthermore, individuals who are innocent and being prosecuted for a crime can be convinced that there is enough substantial evidence to prove their guilt, even when there is little to no substantial evidence in the case to start with. They are pushed to believe they would not make it through trial and receive an innocent verdict, often times causing blameless persons to accept a plea-bargain (Gilchrist, 2011). Unfortunately, there is substantial evidence proving that more guiltless individuals are imprisoned due to accepting a plea bargain than taking the case to trail and demanding their innocence (Gilchrist,…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abolishing the Plea Bargaining System 97 percent of federal cases and 94 percent of state cases end in plea bargains, with defendants pleading guilty in exchange for a lesser sentence (Goode, 2012). A plea bargain is an arrangement that happens between a prosecutor and the defendant in a criminal case. The prosecutor gives the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty to their charge or a lesser charge in order to avoid trial and the possibility of receiving the maximum sentence. While it would seem that plea bargains are equally beneficial to both prosecutors and defendants, plea bargains are overwhelmingly beneficial to the prosecutor and it is the defendant who ultimately can be harmed by plea bargaining. Plea bargaining should be banned because it bargaining circumvents the Constitutional rights for defendants, leads to shortcuts in the judicial system and can lead to increased convictions of the innocent.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Issues

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Introduction Plea bargaining according to Meridian-Webster dictionary (2015), is defined as a process in which a person who is accused of a crime and is allowed to the he or she is guilty of a less serious crime in order to be given a less severe punishment. Once a defendant enters a plea bargain they are not allowed to recant their plea. This process can be initiated by both the prosecutor and the defense attorney. If a defendant’s lawyer offers the plea bargain to the prosecutor and it is accepted, it is a win for the defense. A prosecutor’s plea is usually one that is not accepted at first.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, it forces innocent defendants to plead guilty to a lesser offense they truly did not commit, just to avoid the maximum sentence for the initial crime they were charged with and also did not commit (Graham, 2014). Furthermore, by overcharging and due to bail being set so high for certain defendants, it is more difficult for the families of those who are incarcerated to bail out their loved ones. Therefore, when a defendant must remain in custody…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The court system has its flaws also regarding how even not guilty people who are arrested confess the guilt because of PLEA bargaining system.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If plea bargaining is continually being used, It will empowers the criminals to bargain for a lighter punishment. It weakens the proposition that a criminal should receive punishment suited to the crime that they had done. Based on Penal Code, criminal should be given just punishment to give fair decision for both parties. The Penal Code has stated various crimes and its punishment done by the defendant for their wrongful acts. For example, if a prosecutor is going to let a defendant plead guilty for 3 years of rehab instead of taking the risk of 7 years, this will allow the defendant to escape full punishment.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many factors that determine whether a plea bargaining will be reached in an individual case and whether a plea bargaining is a desirable outcome. Both sides will carefully weigh the strength of their case. The prosecutor may also consider the publici-ty surrounding the case and whether there is public pressure to prosecute that particular defendant to the full extent of the law. The defence will also take into account the se-riousness of the potential…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics