Plea Bargaining Research Paper

Improved Essays
Plea Bargaining

Introduction

In 1954 the Supreme Court of the United States overturned Plessy v. Ferguson which legalized Jim Crow. Although overt racism was outlawed, many believed the problem to be solved. Most people believed the problem was segregation but segregation was a representation of an institutional value system of race, gender and wealth. The legal system in America still allows for racial exclusivity and discrimination on members of minority groups. The plea bargaining process is used in the legal system to help resolve criminal cases and supports the basic structure of the legal system but does not support the due process rights of criminal defendants.

Plea Negotiations Support the Structure of the Legal System

The adversary system is the legal system in which prosecution and defense are opponents, or adversaries, and present cases. The goal in an adversarial system is not to determine the truth but to win. The majority of criminal cases are resolved through plea bargaining- a guilty plea by the defendant in exchange for recommendations of a lesser punishment or reducing the original charge. Plea bargaining brings to light the unreciprocated power that the prosecutor has due to the nature of the criminal justice system in America.

Plea Deals Demonstrate Prosecutorial Power
…show more content…
Kalief Browder was held for three years in prison for being accused of stealing a backpack when he was 16 years old. He spent nearly two of the three years in solitary confinement, alone in a cell for 23 hours a day. Browder never stood trial and insisted on his innocence, refusing several offers from prosecutors to take a plea deal, including one that would have allowed him to be released immediately (Schwirtz & Winerip, 2015). Ultimately prosecutors dropped Kalief Browder’s charges because during the three years they had lost contact with their only

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Fortunately, the tragedies that occurred throughout Browder’s case have had a lasting impact on the justice system. The use of solitary confinement for juveniles in jail has been banned as a result of Browder’s death. But, there were many other injustices that occurred throughout…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R Vs Nixon Essay

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After considering both sides of the argument, the author of this paper agrees with the Supreme Court of Canada and their decision to allow prosecutorial reneging of plea bargains. This opinion is based on the goal of the proper administration of justice and the fact that justice Charron made clear in the case that reputations should remain rare (R v. Nixon, para 69). Therefore, there is not the fear that plea bargains can be revoked on a…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The individuals falsely accused in the article may have been victims of the Assembly-Line Justice Court Model. It is discussed that this type of court is unfair with little concern for efficiency or processes. This model also suggests that plea bargains are frequent because parties wish to make a quick decision. Milton Lantigua was offered a plea bargain but denied it because of his innocence. He was then sentenced to 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining has many benefits which is why it is so common in the United States criminal justice…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Weeping in the Playtime of Others In reading Weeping in the Playtime of Others: America’s Incarcerated Children by Kenneth Wooden, I learned about the devastating, heartbreaking truths about how corrupt our juvenile legal system is. I knew there was probably some violence within the facilities, but I didn’t realize the extent of the torture and physical abuse the youth experienced within in the juvenile correctional facilities across America. I was shocked by the amount of youth that weren’t actually what we would consider criminals. These children were incarcerated because they were emotionally disturbed, mentally handicapped or because they ran away from home to escape a bad situation.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of coercion in plea bargains is constitutional according to the Supreme Court. Since plea-bargains for drug courts involve a greater need of coercion than normal court process due to the limited options available, it is considered a leveraging power to help drug users take advantage of the necessary treatment provided. However, the excessive use of coercion has led to many drug offenders entering treatment that are considered understaffed and over capacity (Parsons & Wei, 2015). The excessive use of coercion has also forced a drug courts to choice in behalf of the defendant, since the alternative is facing a jail sentence. Despite the concerns addressed, the courts when challenged of this claim find under the drug court setting that…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages

    You succinctly described how the Plea and Plea Bargaining phase is an important but controversial part of the Juvenile Court Process. As you noted through your law enforcement experience, many see plea bargaining as a miscarriage of justice. While it does bring an otherwise weak case to some type of closure therefore ultimately saving the time of the court and money for the tax papers, it does not truly bring justice for the victim(s) or the community. “Counterarguments hold that plea bargaining with juveniles is an unregulated and unethical process” (Siegel & Welsh, 2014, p. 360). This is one of the many gray areas that the juvenile court system has as apposed to the adult system.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on the aforementioned statements in this week’s assignment, I agree with the second statement regarding plea bargaining being right and proper. Like any tool utilized to find a solution, or to compromise, plea bargaining can be abused. A majority of the time I feel that plea bargaining is a great tool that allows for a reduction in the number of trails that judges oversee (Plea Bargaining, 2009). Moreover, I believe that our justice system is flooded and congested with pending trials and lacks the resources needed to pursue each trial with an equal amount of attention (Plea Bargain, 2009).…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judge has the power to accept or deny the plea deal, and part of this process is to deny sentences that stray too far from the Sentencing Guidelines. Kosman writes that it is even encouraged for the prosecutor, defendant, and judge to agree to a plea sentence “explicitly calculated according to guidelines” (Kosman 806). Federal district courts that have denied these motions for sentence modifications, and federal circuit appellate courts that have upheld such rulings based on assumptions of the plea sentence and the per se rule have clearly demonstrated the overall trouble plea bargains have caused defendants. While plea bargains have clearly not been the best deal for defendants who are often first-time offenders, such a high rate of cases ending in plea bargains demonstrates the ubiquity and power of the practice in the American criminal system. This facet, combined with the disparity in crack cocaine sentencing has produced even more unjust outcomes for defendants who were offered sentence reductions by the Sentencing Commission, and reflects the harsh reality of plea bargains in the American criminal…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What is the role of the prosecutor in the plea bargaining process? The role of the prosecutor in a Plea-bargaining process is to get the defendant to come to an agreement to where the defendant pleads guilty to some or many of the charges filed against them therefore bypassing a costly trial preceding. The prosecutor usually offers a reduced punishment if the defendants agrees to their terms. In some jurisdictions prosecutors and the defendant can work with the judges to help them determine what the sentence they will get if they accept the plea bargain. As prosecutor, what would you recommend in an attempt to resolve the case and why?…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When less severe crimes receive the same or similarly harsh punishments as more serious or felonious crimes it creates an inequality within the courtroom. Removing plea bargaining would show results similar to the case from 1975 in Alaska where the Attorney General forbade prosecutors from plea bargaining with offenders. The results from this occurrence showed that the punishments for violent and felonious crimes did not change, but the punishments for less serious offenses and misdemeanors where dramatically increased (Rubinstein & White, 1978). The inequality created from the removal of plea bargaining would have drastic effects on the criminal justice system where the punishment for less serious crimes would be severely punishable but would have little to no effect on felonies and crimes of a violent nature. In the case from Alaska the primary objective was to hinder plea bargaining for the more serious offenders yet the outcome would eliminate the discretionary decision making of the courts and would lead to first time offenders of smaller crimes receiving unequal punishments for their crimes and reduced probability for parole (Rubinstein & White, 1978).…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abolishing the Plea Bargaining System 97 percent of federal cases and 94 percent of state cases end in plea bargains, with defendants pleading guilty in exchange for a lesser sentence (Goode, 2012). A plea bargain is an arrangement that happens between a prosecutor and the defendant in a criminal case. The prosecutor gives the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty to their charge or a lesser charge in order to avoid trial and the possibility of receiving the maximum sentence. While it would seem that plea bargains are equally beneficial to both prosecutors and defendants, plea bargains are overwhelmingly beneficial to the prosecutor and it is the defendant who ultimately can be harmed by plea bargaining. Plea bargaining should be banned because it bargaining circumvents the Constitutional rights for defendants, leads to shortcuts in the judicial system and can lead to increased convictions of the innocent.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For many years, in one form or another, the criminal justice system has existed. The criminal justice system is the system that enforces rules and regulates the safest structure for society. There are many levels to enforcing justice and one crucial part of the criminal justice system is plea bargaining. According to Jus 505 lecture (2011), a plea bargain is when a defendant pleads guilty to their offence to receive a less harsh punishment. There has been much controversy over this procedure due to its ethical and legal implications.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many factors that determine whether a plea bargaining will be reached in an individual case and whether a plea bargaining is a desirable outcome. Both sides will carefully weigh the strength of their case. The prosecutor may also consider the publici-ty surrounding the case and whether there is public pressure to prosecute that particular defendant to the full extent of the law. The defence will also take into account the se-riousness of the potential…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays