Epicurus's Materialism Research Paper

Improved Essays
Epicurus’ atomism approach to life and reality is a materialistic one. In fact, Epicurus believed that only what is material is real, while all the rest is a simple product of the imagination of men. For instance, in his vision, the soul of a human being is made of atoms just like all other material things. He considered the soul the organ of perception from which sensation originates only when it works together with the rest of the human body. Furthermore, if the soul is material, when the body dies and decomposes, the soul dissipates with it, making every belief of life after death a false one. In fact, if there is no body to work with the soul, no sensations are possible, and no life after death is conceivable. Epicurus focused on this line of thinking to explain why human beings should not stress about the existence of Heaven and Hell after death because they are simply not possible as for they are product of the imagination. With an understanding of these concepts, it is easier to grasp Epicurus’ statement, “Thanks be to blessed Nature because she has made what is necessary easy to supply, and what is not easy unnecessary...The right understanding of these facts enables us to refer all choice and avoidance to the health of the body and the soul's freedom from disturbance, since this is the aim of the life of …show more content…
If a man is capable of seeking only those natural and necessary desires, while completely avoiding the vain ones, then serenity can be attained. Fear and vain desires are the greatest and tremendous enemies of happiness. For example, a man who craves more than the natural and necessary desires of his body, is a man who will never be satisfied and truly happy. Epicurus invited men to obey nature, rather than violate her, by repelling those desires which are not natural and would surely harm the human

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “Rid yourself of false beliefs” is an appropriate characterization of Epicureanism for the following reasons. Epicurus like Aristotle believed that the highest good is happiness however unlike Aristotle he believed that the path to happiness is pleasure. The main reason Epicurus associated happiness with pleasure is because people do everything for their own sake or their own pleasure. Everything we do in life is for our own pleasure. This can clearly be seen in infants.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Epicurean view, death does not affect the living. In a quote presented to us by Silverstein from Epicurus's “Letter to Menoeceus”, it is stated “So death, the most terrifying of ills, is nothing to us, since so long as we exist, death is not with us; but when death comes, then we do not exist. It does not concern either the living or the dead, since for the former it is not, and the latter are no more”. It seems difficult to argue against this reasoning, and certainly Silverstein demonstrates that difficulty by presenting the Epicurean Problem of the no-subject and its many counters (which largely follow deprivation-of-life arguments, which fail to prove sufficient against the no-subject by Silverstein's account). The problem…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the suffering of fear of meeting hated enemies, Epictetus would advise one to take pride in themselves and be content with what they have in their lives. When one gains wealth in the beginning it is astonishing, however as they try to protect and upsurge their possessions they unavoidably attract enemies and negativity, inevitably bringing never-ending decay and demolition. If one remains indebted for their positon in life, they will not desire possessions, thus they will avoid inviting enemies. Epictetus would advise one to be content with their status in life. I am certain that he would enforce the idea of contentment, due to his constant mention of eliminating desires, and staying detached.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Epictetus Research Paper

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stephen Taylor Humanities Epictetus. Enchiridion. Dover Publications, 2004 28 September 2014 The philosopher Epictetus was born ca. 50 A.D. in southwest Turkey.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the others agree to this point, Socrates then notes that a philosopher does not “concern himself with the so-called pleasures connected with” bodily pleasures (Phaedo, 64d). Thus, he concludes, through death a philosopher is freed from bodily temptations, which only serve to distract from thinking about higher truths, for “when [the soul] tries to investigate anything with the help of the body, it is obviously led astray” (Pha.,…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that death annihilates identity and identity ends when the body ends. Human are necessarily mortal; even if they’re put back together after death, it would not be the same because the only thing that makes an individual themselves is the unity of the identity and body. When the connection of these two break, there is no putting them back together. Epicurus has the notion that “good and bad consists of sense-experience” (164). Death is the annihilation of those experiences.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his Letters to Herodotus, Epicurus’ material outlook assumes that all things are made out of atoms, an argument that he extends to the soul. He raises the point that the soul is material and capable of sensation, and these sensations build out thoughts; however, this assumption tends to categorize human thoughts and limit originality and creativity. In the text, Epicurus explains that the soul is a structure that is material and primarily used for sensation; these sensations become responsible for our thoughts and reason. The soul’s relationship to the body is important in this respect.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is the good life? Many philosophers believe that they know what a good life is, what it consists of and how the good life can be reached. Lucretius, a Roman philosopher who followed the idea of Epicureanism, believed that simple pleasures and avoiding pain is happiness which leads to the good life opposed to Epictetus, a Greek philosopher who followed the idea of Stoicism, believed that one should never desire or seek pleasure whatsoever. Although Epicureanism may sound similar to Epictetus, the founder of this system of philosophy was actually Epicurus, who was Lucretius' role model. His philosophy "proposed that the ultimate goal of human life was happiness, and that the greatest good was to seek modest pleasures in order to attain a…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus Argument Analysis

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Therefore, Person X’s own death can not be bad for him. In his argument, Epicurus’ definition of death is the end of life. This end of life also implies the privation of all awareness. In Epicurus’ Letter to Menoeceus he says, “[Death] is nothing, then, either to the living or to the dead, for with the living it is not and the dead exist no longer.”…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Atom is the smallest and the main component of the universe. It is the building block of universe. Atom cannot be created neither be destroyed. Epicurus believed that everything that exists in the universe is made up of atoms and its compounds. He didn’t believe in gods or devils, neither in heaven and hell.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This theory implies the fact that happiness can be achieved through multiple aspects of life and that each new situation has the opportunity to either enhance or diminish a person’s happiness levels rather than Aristotle’s view that happiness either exists or it doesn’t. Epictetus stresses that things in the world do not have the power to disturb humanity but rather the judgements that are placed on these things do. Happiness mainly stems from how easily people can recognize what is under their control as well as how they react to situations that they can encounter. Unlike Aristotle’s theory, Epictetus’ view on happiness seems to be one that most people can easily attain happiness as the highest good with. This is because Epictetus is correct in his statement…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Epicurus was one of the major philosophers during his time. He was an ancient Greek philosopher who lived from 341 BC to 270 BC. Epicurus died from kidney stones. He grew up in an Athenian colony called Samos which is an island in the Mediterranean Sea. Epicurus studied under followers of Democritus and Plato.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also said that death couldn’t be good or bad because those feelings only comes through conscious and real thoughts. This is the main reason I do not agree with Epicures. I believe that death is bad for us because of the fact that we cannot experience…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We have to learn how to control the appetites, desires, and emotions in the Sentient part of our mind. Sentient is part of our mind and soul that is good for human life. But for Aristotle, human life does not just compose of the emotions. Aristotle claims that the feeling part is just as much part of the human being as the intellectual part. He states that it’s not really human, unless it involves the functional part of the mind.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Epicurus Vs Augustine

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Epicurus’ letter to Herodotus, he describes how the soul no longer could feel anything following the death of the body. When a person dies and “the whole body is destroyed, the soul is scattered and no longer enjoys the same powers and motions; and, as a result, it no longer possesses sensation,” (Epicurus, 278). While he was not specific of whether or not the soul is destroyed when it no longer experiences sensation, Epicurus did not imply an idea of an afterlife for the soul once the body has moved on. For if there is to be an afterlife such as heaven or hell, the soul must be able to experience these things through sensation, experiencing the comfort of heaven or the torture of hell. As a Christian, Augustine believed in an afterlife that involves the reunion of the soul with God (provided that the soul was not corrupted by sin).…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays