Epicurus

Improved Essays
"Thanks be to blessed Nature because she has made what is necessary easy to supply, and what is not easy unnecessary...The right understanding of these facts enables us to refer all choice and avoidance to the health of the body and the soul's freedom from disturbance, since this is the aim of the life of blessedness." Epicurus believed in a simplistic way of life. He believed that happiness is not found in living a luxurious, extravagant life, instead it can be found in living a simpler life with fulfillment of basic needs, friends and family. As he said in the above quote “thanks to nature because she has made what is necessary easy to supply and what is not easy unnecessary…” meaning we do not need excessive things in our life to be happy …show more content…
Atom is the smallest and the main component of the universe. It is the building block of universe. Atom cannot be created neither be destroyed. Epicurus believed that everything that exists in the universe is made up of atoms and its compounds. He didn’t believe in gods or devils, neither in heaven and hell. He was an atheist that did not believe in supernatural beings. He thought of the soul and biblical characters as our imagination. He believed that these things only obstruct us on our path to happiness. The thought of heaven and hell only creates fear and disturbs our minds. That will lead to a life of unhappiness. So, according to Epicurus, religion only instills fear and pain obstructing them of happiness.
In broad sense, Epicurus was a hedonist. He believed that the pleasure is the highest good. But Epicurean hedonism was a little different than just vulgar hedonism. While vulgar hedonism sought excess of pleasure like fine wine, sex, and luxury whereas Epicurean hedonism is about having pleasure in the present while planning for the future. For instance, getting drunk will give pleasure tonight but will feel awful tomorrow and also in the long run. However, doing exercise will cause pain now but is a lot better in the long run. That is Epicurean happiness, to live a satisfied
…show more content…
So, that is why we pursue expensive things out of our reach in search of happiness. But instead we end up spending too much it only causes problems leading to unhappiness. According to Epicurus, there are only few things required to be happy. Firstly, we need friends. We are social animals and we need companionship. Lonely life can never lead to happiness and it is among friends through good times and bad times if they are always together, they can find happiness. Second thing is freedom. Freedom is very important aspect of happiness. People need freedom to enjoy and relax. They cannot find happiness if they are restricted by work, chores or some other things. They need freedom to pursue

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To Epicurus Happiness

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages

    To Epicurus happiness is obtained with the study of philosophy. Analyzing philosophy, one must consider the following The Gods, Death, and contemplate the Moral Theory. Contrary to popular opinion, gods are not how the population perceives them to be. The gods do exist, but human perception alters the original essence. Death, as well, is often perceived to be the “evilest of all evils”; however, it should not be feared and instead live the happiest life. A wise man neither fears or longs for death…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death without question is inevitable, but is it bad for the person who dies? The shared account of Epicurus and Lucretius unravel this question, in the Philosophy and Death; there shared view is contrasted by the piece by Nagel. It is important to note that all three accounts are assuming the soul ceases to exist when the body perishes. Epicurus’ explanation is centered around death being nothing to humans because bad is centered around sense experience which death is the privation of (). Furthermore…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus Argument Analysis

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages

    been whether death is bad for the person that dies. According to Epicurus and Rosenbaum, humans should not fear death because they are unaware of their death and therefore death cannot be bad for them. According to Nagel, however, says death is bad for the person who dies because it deprives that person of all the good that life can bring them. Therefore, they disagree on whether death is implicitly bad for the person that dies. Epicurus argument goes as follows: If person X is unaware of his own death…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays