The Pros And Cons Of Testing Animals

Improved Essays
Over 100 million animals are killed each year by money-hungry corporations just to test animals for products. There should be other ways to test products instead of using animals. In most cases, animal testing is unreliable, cruel, and even dangerous . Different scientists have been trying to find different alternatives instead of using animals for testing. Many ethical, scientific businesses are offering different incentives to companies to help decrease the number of animals being tested on for human benefit. Companies should not be testing animals because it is considered animal cruelty and unethical.
There are different alternatives that can be used instead of testing animals . There is a concept of the 3R’s which is The Reduction , the Refinement and the Replacement. The first of the 3 R’s, Reduction,
…show more content…
They use this concept during research and testing. There has been scientific advantages in using alternative testing methods. an option. Not testing on animals is more cost efficient and practical. “Nearly 50 different alternative methods and testing strategies have been developed, validated and/or accepted by international regulatory authorities” (Humane Society). Most of the advantages associated with these alternatives are cost effectiveness. Here are some of the different alternatives the In vitro (test tube) test methods and models based on human cell and tissue cultures.
Microfluidic chip testing and the artificial tissue testing are becoming more popular in the scientific research field. In Dwortzan article, he claims, “The microfluidic chip also proved far more effective than other commonly used flu diagnostic tests including viral culture, a lab procedure requiring up to a week to produce results” (Dwortzan). has proven to be very effective in finding cures for different virus. If they use this method less animals will not be harmed. It is a faster, cheaper, and more effective diagnostic test

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Should significant resources be expended in order to phase out the use of animals in preclinical testing? Topic Preclinical animal testing is an outdated research method which is inaccurate, unethical, and extremely costly; sponsor companies should expend the necessary resources to begin adopting non-animal testing models as they become available in order to progressively reduce, and ultimately discontinue their use of animals. The contents of this paper will discuss supporting ethical, scientific, and economic evidence, in addition to evaluating possible opposing arguments, and proposing a relevant plan of action. Background Preclinical animal testing has been a boiler plate topic for nearly a century.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every year, more than 100 million animals are being tested with products to help cure an illness, or are helping to better the life of humans. If these products work, then it is a success, but if they do not work it hurts the animal’s and it puts them in danger. Many may say it is a good thing because the products are being tested before handing them to a human. Animal testing is that it is wrong and dangerous and especially for the safety of medications for human consumption.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On average, about 26 million animals are taken and used as little test subjects for big corporations to test their possibly harmful, and occasionally lethal, products before they release them to the public's use. This testing on animals began in 500 B.C and many corporations that participate in it see no harm, and have absolutely no intentions of stopping it anytime soon. There are many people that think testing these possibly dangerous products on innocent animals is not a big deal, but this paper will inform the public with some statistics and also give you the writer's perspective on why animal testing is wrong. One thing that is very arguable when talking about whether testing on these creatures should be approved, and continue or…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ineffectiveness of Animal Testing in the Medical Field Experimenting on animals for knowledge in the scientific field is not something newly developed. Aristotle in 300 BC was known for dissecting animals and then making hypotheses about what he discovered in their anatomy. Even in current modern society, learning is done through animal experimentation and dissection. Almost as if a rite of passage, most students in high school will dissect either a worm or cat to help with their learning process and to develop their skill in the scientific method. Some scientists still believe in using animal testing for new drugs, drugs that are put on the market for the general populace to consume.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The FDA notes that they “support the development and use of alternatives to whole-animal testing,” (FDA Site). Since studies show that the results of animal testing not only are different between species, but are far from being accurate to human reactions. The process of getting rid of animal testing starts with what the article, “Detailed Discussion of Animal Testing in Commercial Products” calls the three R’s which includes “the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animal testing,”. Specifically, the goal is to “reduce the number of animals used in experiments, refine experimental procedures to minimize animal pain and suffering, and replace animal subjects with non-animal alternatives when scientifically feasible,”. There are already many approved ways to test that do not involve using living animals.…

    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is not only a research to find cures for human diseases, it is also an experimentation to establish safety of various products such as daily…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Animals be used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? Introduction Can you imagine over 100,000 animals dying every year due to animal testing? Some people say it’s for a good cause. Others say it’s a cruel and inhumane thing to do.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to whether animals should be used in animal testing, the problem that arises with this is the moral ethics that come with animal testing. Because of these morals, I decided that using animals for testing is wrong. This paper will give reasons why using animals is wrong and ways it can be changed to prevent animals from being used by research laboratories in companies just to see how humans might benefit from the process used in testing. Why animals are used in testing, from a scientist’s perspective the reasons for animals being used in testing is because since animals have no cognitive ability and no moral judgement like humans do, then it is acceptable to conduct experiments on them. Another example is because the requirement…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Besides the clear positive of using alternative methods for experimentation and testing because they are more humane, there are so many other advantages these alternatives have that make them undeniably more fit for the job. Animal testings are time consuming with just one simple test taking up to 3 years (“End Animal”). Adding to that these experiments and testings are extremely expensive and can cost up to millions of dollars unlike the many alternate methods. This money which has been estimated to reach about 16 billion a year is being taken from taxpayers pockets. Not only that, but much of the money obtained by health charities go straight to help fund these testings (“Animal Testing”).…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans do not see that when companies test their products on animals that some animals suffer. Often humans care about which product is the best and that desire overshadows how companies found their products safe to use in the first place. Animals do not deserve to go through pain and even death just to make our lives safer. Therefore companies should stop testing their products on animal testing because it cruel and it is inconvenient. The physical difference between animals and human make animals poor test subjects and animals suffered a lot of pain during testing.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With all the testing that gets done to the animals, some of the tests fail and we can’t even use the products. Testing on animals could kill them during the tests. Testing on any species is dangerous, it’s like testing on a human, the results are uncertain. The amount of animals dying from the tests in a year is insane, “ONE…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to “Should Animals Be Used For Scientific or Commercial Testing?”, an estimated 26 million animals are used each year in the United States to test vaccines, drugs, and commercial products. While the research is beneficial to humans, the helpless test subjects often are injured by the substance or are killed directly following their trial. Animal testing should not be allowed for commercial products, but may be used for medical research as long as the creatures are treated with care. Experimentation on animals is cruel and inhumane.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Beneficial

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many people who support this form of scientific research because they believe it is better to test on animals rather than humans themselves because it is “impractical…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    n the late 1800s animal testing emerged as a way of testing human inventions before applying them to a human organism. Due to the lack of technology, animals seemed to be the most accurate way to predict a human’s reaction to a product before risking the life of a person. While this practice might have been one of the better options in the past, it is unreliable and needs to be eradicated. Every year approximately 17-22 million animals are used in research testing. Not all of the testing is done for medical research; in fact many are done by cosmetic companies.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dangers of using animals to test products being made for human uses is a high risk. Approximately 225 million animals are used for testing every year. Billions have been killed in the process. ("Questions and Answers About Biomedical Research.” )…

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays