Difference Between Realism And Liberalism

Great Essays
Carin, Gladys Ian T. IRO
BA in Political Science

In order for a state to survive, it must learn how to communicate with other states. States have different national interest that may contravene with other states and may result into tragedies like war between states and its allies. International relations or IR was created to study and understand relations among states and know the cause of conflict between states so that it could prevent war from happening. International relations try to make foreign relations better so that war may be altered. Foreign relations include trade between nations and how they interact with one another.
International relations has different theories. Theories such as realism and liberalism are the principal
…show more content…
Realism can be compared to Hobbesian theory of classical realism having a pessimistic view of world politics and state to state relations. It says that world politics or relations between states is a struggle among states with different self-interests and especially on the struggle to be the most powerful state. Each state competes with one another depending on their national interest and because of that world peace under a world government is impossible. In realism, realists see international relations as a means of securing their state interests. This is because having relationship with states may help each other states to maintain its existence even though cooperation and change between states are limited. As that being said, I will go to the questions of 1) The role of international organizations in building world peace, 2) balance of power and hegemony and 3) state sovereignty. These questions will be answered and explained in correlation with the realists’ point of …show more content…
First we must know the definitions of power and hegemony. Power is defined as “man’s control over the minds and actions of another men or the ability to control people to behave in a certain way” (Morgenthau, 1946) is similar to the definitions of the state for the realists. Realists believe that the behavior or states towards each other is based upon the constant struggle of power. “International politics as observed in reality is essentially power politics” (P Toledo, 2005). So the question of how to balance the power and prevent hegemony arrives. Balancing of power can be done in different ways; it can be done by making stronger states weaker to balance the weak ones or making weak states stronger to balance the stronger one. Or it could be maintaining into the equilibrium where the United States are recognized as a super power that is hard to be contested and other states are neutralized because of it. In realism, balance of power and the rise of hegemony can be achieved through war. Through war, states can overthrow other states that take advantage of their military capabilities. These are done through alliances with weaker states joining up together and becoming stronger. The balances of power among states differ on how strong and weak they are. Strong states uses balance of power by maintaining as the stronger state that cannot be contested and weaker states depends their

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The Pros Of Constructivism

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The constructivist turn in IR marks a shift from the material determinants of international politics to ideational factors, such as beliefs, ideas, and norms. The two dominant theoretical schools in IR, neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism (NLI), share several key assumptions regarding the anarchic nature of the international system, states are self-interested, rational actors, driven by material interests in power/survival (neorealists) or security (NLI). In addition, neorealism and NLI both rely on a rational choice framework borrowed from microeconomics that assumes cost-benefit analysis and utility maximization as the impetus behind state’s political calculus. Although conditioned by the same assumptions, neorealists and NLI reach vastly different conclusions regarding the potential for conflict and cooperation in international politics.…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Louisiana Purchase International relations is driven by many things with those things being theories, these theories then for the international events that in turn formed the modern state system that is in place today. The Louisiana Purchase was an even that occurred mainly between France and The United States with some relations with Spain. The Louisiana Purchase and the realist point of view it was completed from was one of the many events that helped formed today’s modern state system. The Louisiana Purchase was a deal between France and The United States that led to the exchange of a large portion of land in the Western hemisphere. France explored the land around the Mississippi River and settled in many different places around the region…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Generalizations derived from traditional international politics do not apply today in the following ways: war between great powers is unthinkable, so new world orders will emerge; because of the high interdependence of states, Gross Domestic Product is no longer a valid measurement of power; and the presence of data and cyber-security issues causes problems regarding globalization and who controls cyberspace, which can decrease American hegemony. According to Robert Jervis in his essay, “The Era of Leading Power and Peace,” “Threatening war, preparing for it, and trying to avoid it have permeated all aspects of politics, and so a world in which war among the most developed states is unthinkable will be very different from the history with…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thus emerging actors will seek a ‘balance of power’ within the current system. That, “balancing involves institutional strategies such as the formation of limited diplomatic coalitions or ententes to constrain the superior powers. It also involves strengthening economic ties between peers, which can possibly shift the balance of economic power against the more powerful state/s in the long term.” (Flemes, 6)…

    • 1075 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (kim,1992:4) . In world politics Organski suggest that the wars pertaining to power shift are initiated by the weaker but rising power. Levy goes into more detail and argues that the rising state would only contest the status quo after it has evaluated the possible responses it will receive from the established power. If the rising state believes that the declining state will the event that the declining state is expected to give in, the rising state will then choose to push its movement forward and make demands.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After learning about the broad concepts of foreign policy and the specifics of American history from the 1800s to the present day, I believe that the scope or arc of the policy has been progressive and interrelated. Foreign policy builds off the past mistakes and successes this has led to a transformation from isolationism to engagement. Power can be seen as a driving force in the change in the U.S’s approach to international relations and as a main method of foreign involvement. Manifest Destiny and the Monroe Doctrine are two early examples of this shift to engagement. Acquiring possession of land and other nations puts the U.S into the concerns of other nations.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    20 years have passed since after the cold war ended. It seems that the ideology, political beliefs or ideas that shape a characteristic of the nation, plays less important roles in international society. Moreover, the difference between democracy and communism will not generate further conflict as one can see Vietnam and other nations are working alongside in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. In such international environment, however, there are several occasions which produce seeds of conflict such as territorial disputes, human rights abuses, and developing nuclear weapons and provoking other nations. Some countries still applying containment policy in their problem.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of International Politics is impossible without the existence of power pursuance. Power can be described by Steven Lukes as “A gets B to do something A wants but B would have not chosen to do” (2004: 122). According to Heywood, Politics has three characteristics: it is an activity, it is social and it originates from diversity. By using the term diversity, he refers to having a diversity of opinions, interests and ways of thinking (2004).…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Hegemony Summary

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Robert Keohane’s After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World of Political Economy addresses the extent of interaction and collaboration between nations, in addition to the contention between nations. He states that in comparison to the rivalry and disagreement, the level of cooperation in global politics is quite low. This is because of a hasty increase of interdependence amongst nations following World War II, which has led not only to the increase of cooperation, but also to an increase strife. With an increase of parties in world politics and the ability to easily communicate and thus develop a system of interdependence, the discord among states has become likened to anarchy due to no dominating authority, or hegemonic leadership.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic of Internationalism has been one of major debate recently as the formation of the United Nations ( U.N), and European Union (E.U), as well as advancements in technology, have brought us closer together. It is the belief of former U.N governor general Kofi Annan, that internationalism is the next logical step for humanity; that we should put aside parts of our national interests, for the good of humanity as a whole. Kofi Annan's view come from that of an internationalist, he believes that the next political step is that of a world government; that the world should change into a more interconnected society, isolation amongst nations leads to undermining and sabotaging others in the name of one's nation. In his mind national…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Examining the historical background of the United States, liberalism, with its belief in negative liberty, and republicanism, with its belief in positive liberty, have always been the dominant political ideologies in the United States. That said I am of the inclination that even as modern American government may appear to be republican, liberalism remains inherent within the nature of the people of the United States itself. I would first examine the characteristics of the two streams of political thought, before using those differences to prove that the United States is steeped more in liberalism than republicanism by looking at the unique nature of the New World, the nature of American republicanism as well as the careful machinations of…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism and the End of the Cold War by William C. Wohlforth argues that Modern realism began in a reaction to the breakdown in the post-World War One international order. Wohlforth’s main ideology is realism and states how the rise and fall of realism has taken place, but stresses that international world events cannot weaken or destroy the realist ideology. The collapse of the great power cooperation helped emerge realism to be a dominant position in international relations. The central question presented in this article looks to seek to ask, did the rapid decline and peaceful collapse of the Soviet State, along with the postwar international order, discredit the realist approach? However, Wohlforth believes that.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    International conflict is an unresolved issue that continually reappears in our world time after time. Conflicts, big or small, can disrupt the peace and structure of the involved nations, while possibly engaging the rest of the world in their dilemma. The result of these conflicts can cause drastic events such as wars, bombings and even genocide. These detrimental results are not always followed by international conflict but are most certainly susceptible. That is why in this paper I will analyze the topic of when nations should go to war and the role they should play in international conflict.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The idea that ‘states coexist in a competitive arena’ (Waltz 1995) is proved to be exceedingly accurate when regarding wars throughout history. The Cold War for example shows clearly a fight between states (the US and the USSR) to be the hegemon of the international community after the introduction of nuclear weapons threatened the balance of power. Arguably still this was a fight not just for physical security but for the security of ideals, in the eyes of the U.S if “commy” ideology spread then this would pose a threat not only to national security but to their sovereignty also. The Cold War however is viewed to be controversial between Liberalists and Realists. From a liberal perspective the fact that the Cold War ended through peaceful means without conflict proves that war is not inevitable and that diplomatic means and groups such as the UN can ensure peace.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The distribution of power is known as a hegemony and categorizes states in either dominating powers, middle powers, or small powers. The main strength of realism is the fact that law and ethics are separated, therefore a state does not rely on its morals in order to make an executive decision. The possibility of a situation getting out of control and resulting in war is a major weakness in realism, because when states perceive attacked they will become defensive and try to strike first- which leads to…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays