Descartes Arguments For God's Existence Essay

Improved Essays
The Skepticism to Descartes Arguments for God's Existence One would sometime question the existence of god just like how René Descartes questions and argues about god’s existence. In Descartes “meditation on first philosophy,” he talks about reality and as well his existence. But he also talks about the existence of God, in how god could be a deceiver and yet still believing that God is not a deceiver as he said “I have no reason to think that God is such a deceiver. In fact, I don’t even know yet whether God exists” (289). He talks about these claims in the third meditation, as well he states two arguments attempting to prove God’s existence and how God could be more of then an idea. Also, say that he cannot think about existing without thinking …show more content…
At first one could be skeptical when he said that God could not deceive him yet if God is all-powerful and all-knowing he would be able to deceive him with no problem. But he did turn his argument to become reasonable when he suggests that supreme being could be out there and in how human are always admiring people with great power that idea seeing to make sense. Another idea from Descartes that made a little sense in the existence of God is that nothing could exist without another thing making it and the idea the god could have contributed in the making of the human mind similar to our parent contribution to the making of our body this idea could be seeing as a good argument because one could think if God is all-powerful and all-knowing he could be able to create the human mind and make us believe that we exist. Also, another part that made a good argument in Descartes argument about the existence of God is that mind doesn't stop thinking about God, is like in a way that is human nature to think about the creator exists. So in a way is how Descartes said: “that God exists, and that all things depend on him”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The premises of his argument explicitly draw upon the questions. Moreover, even if there is a supreme being that exists, how can it be proved that he gave us these faculties of will and intellect or that he has any interaction with us or cares about us whatsoever? His argument for God as a reason to believe all that one perceives is truth is more of a statement go faith than it is logic. Proving God’s existence is significant to the meditations because it is the only way to bring back the outside world, outside of the mind. For me, the only veridical foundation Descartes intellectual project finds is that…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “I think therefore I am,” the popular quote of philosopher Descartes, is the main premise of his theory of Mind-body Dualism. Interactionism is the theory that there are two realities, mind and body, each of which can have an effect on the other. In contrast, dualists claim that the mind and body are two separate realities. The body is a material thing that operates in a physical reality, while the mind and mental states operate in a nonphysical reality. For the dualist, the way of thinking is an internal thinking on the inside that is private.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “A substance that is infinite, eternal, immutable, independent, supremely intelligent, supremely powerful” (30). This is his idea of what “God” means to him. But if every idea has a formal reality, where did he get this idea from? God must be the cause of this idea therefore God does exist.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes’ second meditation, he offers up an argument for Defective Nature Doubt that brings forth the idea that we can’t be certain of anything we perceive being actual and real (153). Descartes thinks that there is a possibility that we are constantly being deceived due to the fact that we don’t know, with perfect certainty, where our ideas originate from (154). He tries to describe a method in order to dispel this Defective Nature Doubt by giving an argument for the existence of God. I think that the argument he gives for the existence of God is valid, yet I find it to be unsound due to the fact that a few of his premises are can easily be doubted. In order to express this opinion, I will first provide explanations of the premises and…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes begins this argument with the confirmation that God exists. He suggests that God exists because…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes is a devout christian, but even he begins to wonder if he is being deceived by God. However, he quickly abandons this notion and says that because God is supremely good, Descartes knows that God would not purposefully deceive him. In order to obtain resolution in his thoughts, Descartes creates a scenario in which all of his past beliefs are false. He says to suppose that there is no supremely good God but instead an evil demon, who tries to deceive him all the time. Everything Descartes sees is not real, instead it is an elaborate illusion set forth by the evil demon.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God: The Existence Of God

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There would be some other thing existing both in reality and in your mind and therefore that thing would be greater than God. Therefore, as Anselm’s second premise, God has to exist in both the mind and in reality to not contradict our definition of God. Following the two…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the finality of Descartes' first meditation, the meditator is already facing supreme doubt of all formerly inherited and empirical knowledge and builds an approach towards creating a foundation of doubt on all previous beliefs. Believing to have called all of their beliefs into question, the meditator still demands reason to doubt arithmetic and geometric knowledge – a knowledge that to them feels most intuitive; a “perfect knowledge”. To this, the meditator raises a hypothesis that applies their belief in god: The meditator's detailed argument is as follows: P1. I firmly believe that there is an all-powerful god who created me. P2.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes’s mission in the meditations was to doubt everything and that what remained from his doubting could be considered the truth. This lead Descartes to argue for the existence of God. For the purpose of this paper, I will first discuss Descartes’s argument for the existence of God within the third and fifth meditations. I will then take issue with three of Descartes arguments. Descartes argues that some ideas are more real than others.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes makes some very intriguing arguments for the existence of God. I am going to outline the three arguments and provide my opinion over them in form of criticism, like requested. In his first argument, Descartes has an idea that everything has a cause, and that his idea of God being an infinitely perfect being has a cause because Descartes, himself, does not believe he is infinitely perfect. He believes that he could not have an idea of their being an infinitely perfect person unless there actually is. Therefore, an infinitely perfect person exists outside of him, who he believes to be God.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God can’t exist only in the mind because then he would not be the greatest conceivable being. The ontological argument argues that God is the maximally great being that is all-powerful, all-knowing, morally perfect in every possible world. If God is only exists in the mind then that will give room for some more powerful to exist. If there is another being that can be conceived in both the mind and reality than it will be more powerful than God. Thus, God must exist in all possible worlds including the mental state and reality.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Huemer’s essay, “The Lure of Radical Skepticism,” he expands on the idea that ‘we cannot know anything,’ by outlining four different arguments supporting the claim. (Huemer 47-57) René Descartes holds the opposite opinion, which he discusses in ‘Meditations One and Two.’ While there is validity to both sides of the argument, Huemer’s essay proves to be more reliable after dissecting Descartes’ concepts of existence. Huemer proposes that no one can know anything about the external world, or anything that exists outside of the mind.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once he has cleared his mind of all things that may be false he began to build off of the things that he can be sure of. The only other thing that he has decided is true prior to the third meditation is the fact that he exists, if not as a body at least as a thinking being. So using what he has built up so far he begins to use his ability of reasoning in order to determine the existence of God. Using the argument that if he has an idea of something it must be true he reasons within his own mind that God must exist.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does God Exist Essay

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is an analogy for the theists, who believe in God without any proof, and the atheists, who cannot be convinced of God’s existence because there is no tangible…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays