The Ontological Argument That God Exist

Improved Essays
The ontological argument is theory of God based on reasoning alone. The word ‘ontological’ means ‘being’ or ‘exist’. The ontological argument states that God does indeed exist because he is the thought of God can be conceived. The argument was first proposed by Anselm of Canterbury, a monk and christian philosopher. Anselm believed that God was the greatest being conceived and that there was no other being more powerful than God.
According to Anselm, if something is perfect, then it couldn’t possibly be better than it is; there can’t be anything better than perfection. This means that if a thing is perfect then it is impossible to imagine it being better than it is; there is nothing better than it is to imagine. It is impossible to conceive either of there being anything greater than God or of it being possible to
…show more content…
God can’t exist only in the mind because then he would not be the greatest conceivable being. The ontological argument argues that God is the maximally great being that is all-powerful, all-knowing, morally perfect in every possible world. If God is only exists in the mind then that will give room for some more powerful to exist. If there is another being that can be conceived in both the mind and reality than it will be more powerful than God. Thus, God must exist in all possible worlds including the mental state and reality.
One of the biggest objections to the ontological argument is the predicate objection. According to the predicate objection, giving something existence makes it greater, adding existence to something is also similar to adding property to something. Though the Ontological argument adds existence to God, a non believer can counter this argument by removing existence or property from God. An opposer can argue that God does not exist because he lacks such

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Anselm was the first one who developed the ontological argument, an argument for God’s existence based on reason, not on physical evidence. Philosophers call such arguments a priori arguments. In the first premise he defines God as the greatest possible being that can be imagined. Then, he argues that God exists in reality is getter than God exists in the mind. Consequently,…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plurality Of God Analysis

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    […] But if God is not a being, something that just participates in being, then he cannot be but being itself”. Hence, being itself is “[…] the preliminary and necessary concept of God, that we must posit in order to posit God (and not: a god). Therefore, God is being itself. But to be being itself is not his divinity, but rather the presupposition of his divinity”. Thus, the concept of God from a negative point of view includes oneness, which becomes the presupposition of any manifestation of God.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both explantion go against the eternal nature of God, which is necessary to be the greatest conceivable being. Therefore, if God does not exist then his existence is impossible. But whatever is conceivable is possible therefore God must exist. Under this argument it is irrelevant if existence is an attribute or not, solving the problem with Anselm’s ontological…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both attempt to deduce the existence of God by reason alone, and both without any assumption of divine revelation or sensory experience. While the monologion offers compelling proofs for God’s existence, it also suffers from shortcomings, namely an inherent a priori assumption that God exists. What the monologging does offer are a description of divine qualities. While it may prove that God is the most good, the source of existence, ar even a being superior to all others, none of these prove God’s existence. Rather, should the assumption be made that God exists, this is essential description of Him.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although, Descartes, himself is not wholly perfect (p.14), he has an idea of God that lies in the extreme position in the representational scale. Given that the Idea of God, which has an absolutely unlimited content, could not have originated from Descartes, who is finite and imperfect. The source of the idea must be perfect and infinite itself. Descartes is less perfect than God. Consequently, the idea of God in Descartes is innate and it could only origin from God.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Existence Of God

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Cottingham, in his book Descartes, affirms that "The problem is given special piquancy by Descartes ' own statement (...) that 'the certainty and truth of all knowledge depends on my knowledge of the true God ' ". This suggests that the knowledge of God should be axiomatic - but it isn 't. Although all the knowledge depends on the knowledge of true God, Descartes ' does not have, at the starting point, any knowledge of God. He shouldn 't be able to give forth any certain and truthful judgment, yet he claims to do so. Apparently, Descartes employs 'clear and distinct ideas ' in demonstrating that God exists (when he perceives clearly and distinctly that 'existence ' is an essential attribute of God or when he puts forth the causal principle) and then justifies the truthfulness of the clear and distinct ideas by the existence of God.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Ontological Argument

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first step must start with a supposition. This supposition is: Suppose that the greatest conceivable being (GCB or God) exists in the mind alone, and not in reality. The second step leads to the first assumption: Existence in reality is greater than existence in the mind alone. This is where Anselm starts the deduction that if you can imagine God, then if God is supposedly the greatest conceivable idea imaginable. God existing in reality is even greater than mind alone.…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    God is the greatest conceivable being who is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent. He is capable of knowing everything and doing everything, and has perfect goodness. In the ontological argument, Anselm defined God as the greatest conceivable being that nothing greater than Him can be conceived. Suppose God exists in the mind alone. It is better for Him to exist in the mind and in reality than to exist in the mind alone.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this third meditation, it appears that Descartes is using the word ‘reality’ as a synonym for perfection. Thus, if the idea of God has infinite representational reality then God must have infinite intrinsic reality. Or, if Descartes has an idea of God as a infinitely perfect being, then God must be infinitely intrinsic perfection. The relevant question here is what caused Descartes to have this idea of a perfect God. Descartes believe that every effect must have a cause because “something can’t arise from nothing” (Descartes, 1641, p.12).…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If God exists in the mind but not in reality, then we can imagine a greater being than god, we cannot imagine a being greater than God, so if God exists in our mind then God must exist in reality. God does exist in our mind, so he must exist in reality. A being that nothing could be greater than, cannot be conceived to not exist, this means it must…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays