In consequentialism the "outcomes" of an activity are everything the activity achieves, including the activity itself. In consequentialism, the "outcomes" of an activity incorporate (a) the activity itself, and (b) everything the activity causes. What then, do these two sorts of result have in like manner, that makes them both "outcomes"? On the off chance that there is an answer, maybe it is something like this: both An itself and the things A reasons are things that happen on the off chance that you do An instead of the distinct options for