Kant’s critique of consequentialism comes from his principle of morality, more specifically the categorical imperative, and how it is immoral to use an individual as merely as a means to an ends and not be treated as ends in themselves. This theory is in distinct contrast with the principles of consequentialism because the theory is based on the fact that the consequences of a conduct determines whether the conduct is right or wrong. The individual would thus be a slave of utility maximization because their actions would solely be based off of reaping the best possible results. Therefore, meaning that consequentialism does not take into account the morally relevant difference between acts and omissions because consequentialism ignores moral
