Similarities Between Hsun-Tzu And Confucius

Good Essays
Confucius was believed to be born around 551 B.C and lived to 479 B.C. Confucius was a Chinese philosopher in the fifth and sixth century that influenced many people and still does to this day. The Analects is said to be the most reliable source of Confucius’ ideas. The Analects is made up of sayings from Confucius and the people that were with him in his travels. Even though he did not define human nature in any way, Confucius said that all human beings are equal. Confucius’ theory would be valid if he had explained more about his beliefs and included everyone in them.
The Analects are based on humanism, not metaphysics. Confucius was more worried about the basic human welfare and not so much the ultimate nature of the world. He was concerned on a better government that would help the well-being of the common people that would bring peace among the citizens.(Stevenson 19)
There are two forces in the universe that can control our lives, called Destiny and The Decree of Heaven. Confucius stated that Destiny cannot be changed and humans should focus on following morals. Destiny is beyond human control and should be accepted that way. It is how we find ourselves situated.
…show more content…
We are formed and molded by how our character is and how we choose to live our lives. He made some valid points, but he was more focused on the well-being of the men and government, rather than everyone as a whole. Confucius’ theory of human nature can be something to learn from because how is anyone supposed to truly know if humans are good or bad. Humans are natural born sinners and they do not have any control on how their Destiny plays out for them. If they follow The Decree of Heaven then they should be morally good and have good harmony with Heaven. Confucius was unclear on many things, but his beliefs can still answer many questions that are around

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Heaven In Confucianism

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Confucius thought that society had already begun to behave in the appropriate way and that people were in harmony with the atmosphere. It would be cumbrous if he continued to teach people how to be a gentlemen and how to scrupulously abide by one’s duty since people had already absorbed the ideas. But what kind of relationship do people have with Heaven? In order to answer this question, I would like to separate people in three groups: the uneducated, the normal people who have some education but were still far away from the gentlemen and the gentlemen who were high-educated and brilliant. In Analects, Confucius had separated people based on the similar standards.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I disagree with that, I think that having equal opportunities will create peace and not conflict because people will have nothing, in terms of being equal, to fight about. People might fight just simply because they are humans but not because they are equal and have equal opportunities. Moreover, I believe that Hobbes’s first law of nature is somewhat realistic because I think that one should always be peaceful and try to solve any problem with peace. However, when the argument or problem is not solved, one should be ready to endure anything and be ready to defend one’s self. I also believe that Hobbes’s second law of nature is not impossible.…

    • 2532 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Locke does not hide his distrust with masses as he believes that it is much better to put the power in the hands of a small group or individual rather than the whole community. He was also of the opinion that if people are given too much freedom of choice when it comes to religion, it will only create destruction, and chaos. Thus, the magistrate should do their best to ensure peace between people and to protect public good. Naturally, they should abide to the rules themselves, be orderly and decent, and not be motivated by private interest but conversely, by the nation's good. Overstepping some boundaries to ensure the peace within the nation, is acceptable as there has to be some great, ruling power.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dave Matson believes that “morality exists independently of God or religion and those moral laws, such as the one which prohibit murder and theft, were created by humans so that society could function peacefully and efficiently.” This quote entails that God is not the one to say what is right or wrong; it’s the humans who made the moral laws. But if it is humans who made moral laws, how could they decide what is moral and immoral? In the article “Religion is not essential for moral society” it states “We may consign to oblivion the claim, so often heard, that "anything goes" without God. Since moral rules are rooted in the smooth functioning of a society, they will be enforced even if there were no God.” This quote states that society is based on the moral laws and they will exist without God. Also, that religion is not…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes’s main concern has been just he didn’t understand how humans can live together in peace and avoid the violence and living in fear of civil conflict. He felt like we needed one person or a group of people in charge of deciding the correct decisions for every social and political issue that arises. Whereas John Locke just felt like we were all born the same, from the same species so there’s no reason why anyone should or feel better then or over anyone else. And as long as the rights’ are in place, which protects everyone’s lives, possessions and so forth then we can all be accountable for ourselves. Of course in the times, we live in now Hobbes logic works better, I feel because nowadays people are very disrespectful and inconsiderate of people’s lives and possessions, even with a president, governor, and police officials so imagine what life would be like without them.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Like Augustine said, a person cannot totally rely on reason to help them achieve happiness. From a religious perspective, God is all-powerful, so we need his help to obtain overall happiness in our life. However, this does not mean that reason is completely disregarded. Aristotle argues that steps can be taken to ensure a happier life, through our moral growth and whether we chose to live our lives in moderation with the virtues that he sets forth or not. However, a fault with Aristotle’s thinking concerning his theory on moral growth is that he almost assumes that everyone wants to become a better person.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The only reason why I would be punished is because of human law. Humans say that it is wrong to kill people because they themselves don’t want to be killed. Rachels says, “There are some moral rules that all societies will have in common, because those rules are necessary for society to exist.”(Rachels, 22). Yes many people have agreed not to kill others, but it is not because it is right or wrong, but because humans generally like living and do not want other people to take their life away from them or anyone they love. Agreeing not to kill people is a survival tactic so we can build a functioning society and improve our quality of life.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Legalistic faith in strict set laws greatly distinguished them from the Confucians, who relied on leading by example through a sense of benevolence. Majorly unlike Confucianism and Legalism, however, Daoism beliefs were fixated on self-reflection and introspection. Daoists had no desire to associate themselves with worldly concerns, and did not believe in the idea of a government. Instead, Daoists spent their energy on self-reflection and introspection in hopes that they could understand the natural principles that governed the world. Overtime, they believed that understanding these natural principles and learning to live in harmony…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hobbes would much rather use the ‘Social Contract’ method: a group of people to agree and make laws and then finding someone with the same ideas to rule and enforce them. He believes that humans need to be ruled to bring order and that the only person who is equal would be the sovereign who is ruling over everyone. As well-known as Hobbes political ideas are, I however disagree with them. I don’t believe that people have to be ruled over in order for there to be order. I view everyone as equal and that social statuses don’t matter.…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Lao Tzu’s ‘‘Thought from the Tao-te Ching’’and Machiavelli’s ‘‘The Quality of prince’’, they both develop how an outstanding ruler should be by striking a balance between the people and the ruler. Lao Tzu believes since human nature is a part of the holistic universe, all human beings should follow the Way in order to be original people. If the ruler is enlightened by the Way and Tao, he will not try to compete with others because the ruler realizes everything is ought to be moderate and appropriate for his people. Thus, Lao Tzu thinks that the ruler should be tolerant and flexible. However, Machiavelli insists that human nature is selfish and superficial.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays