Augustine Vs Aquinas Argument

Better Essays
The two proofs I am going to compare are Augustine’s argument for God’s existence and Aquinas’ 5 Ways argument for God’s existence. I don’t think either of them prove that God exists, but I think Aquinas’ argument is more effective than Augustine’s. Aquinas covers many different reasons why God exits but not all of them are as good as each other. The arguments about there had to be something that started the movement of the universe and everything in it has a good point that there almost had to be one thing that started all the movement. However, the argument about things could be different but not everything isn’t really a true statement because everything could be completely different we just might not have the ability to think about everything …show more content…
Over time creatures could develop the realization of needing to do stuff to survive which gives them a purpose but that doesn’t mean some god had to give them that purpose they just realized it because if they weren’t doing these certain things then others were dying and figured they had to do it. If it isn’t something that is an animal but has a purpose it doesn’t know that purpose because it can’t think so there would be no point in a god making that purpose because that object can’t decide if it is going to fulfill that purpose or not it just depends on what happens around it to determine if it fulfill its purpose. The last part of Aquinas’ 5 ways that doesn’t work is that it is talking about good and bad which is determined only by the person talking. There is no certain good or bad to where you can put it on a scale and say that some things are good while others are bad. If we think an animal is bad for killing another animal, it would see it as good most likely because the reason it killed the other animal is to get food so it could survive. So, there isn’t a way to scale good and bad therefore there is no absolute good which is what Aquinas is saying that god …show more content…
He bases it off of the idea that there is nothing superior to God or there is nothing superior to the Truth in which God is Truth. But we have no way of nothing what is superior to something else. We might look at something and think we are superior to it while if we saw the situation from it’s side we would see that it is superior to us it is just not showing that it is making us think we are superior. So, we have no way of knowing what is superior to something else. It also runs into the same problem with the good and bad argument that there is not universal superiority that we know of. We have an idea of what superiority is, but we could be completely wrong in that idea and therefor not know what is superior to something else at all. So, we have no way of scaling superiority there for no way of knowing if there is something superior to all else. Even if we did have some way to scale all things universal on a superiority scale just because something is more superior than everything else doesn’t mean that thing is God. We might look at it like it is a god because there is nothing superior to it but it doesn’t mean it is God the way we think of and see God. Augustine also talks about Truth is superior to us but again we don’t know how to scale superiority and how we could scale both us and Truth on the same scale of superiority when there is almost nothing that is in common with humans

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    To reexamine the argument in favor, I would say that it is a valid argument, because if the premises are true then the conclusion would also logically be true. However, premise one is not completely true, due to the fact that there are people who do not believe in God. Agnostics and atheists would not hold true that acts are morally right if God commands them. The objection to the existence of God is a major reason why the Divine Command Theory is not able to fully support the argument. If God is not real, then He could not have created or interpreted morals.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Other than the clear statement that God was the initial cause for all things that exist, it appears God is exempt from causation. Non-theists suggest that if something clearly causes itself to exist, therefore nothing exists before it exists at all. Logically, the idea seems impossible. While arguments posed criticize the cosmological argument and its flaws, it does not prove it to be false. However, while taking into account the lack of present evidence, the argument for God’s existence based on his apparent creation of the universe is lacking with insufficient credibility to go behind it.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    My own view on faith is that it is not a strong enough argument for proof of Gods existence. I agree with Dawkins that to believe something to be true there must be some kind of real evidence. I believe that most people would agree that evidence should be required to prove God exists but many people would argue there is no evidence against God’s…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    These arguments by Descartes were intended to proof God’s existence; nonetheless, the two arguments had weaknesses. An example, in the first argument a person can deny having a perfect idea that is caused by God and therefore not acknowledge the existence of God. With this line of argumentative points, Descartes arguments do not hold meaning and as a consequence the conclusion cannot follow. Second argument is also weak in the sense that Descartes believes that God is perfect and is not a deceiver. How is it then that the imperfect is a deceiver?…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This argument seems to be based on an assumption, on the part of Al-Ghazali, that there is a sense of possibility which is external and above God: one that even God must remain bound by. This can be seen in the juxtaposition of the conclusion and the sixth premise. In the conclusion, Al-Ghazali is content with the claim that God cannot have created a better creation since such a creation is not possible. In premise six, however, Al-Ghazali is quite unhappy with the notion that God is not able to create a creation which is both possible and better than the one in which we live. Al-Ghazali, then, does not take issue with the claim that God cannot do something.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Do God And Evil Coincide?

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    His argument is that if God is all-good he would not create evil and if he is all-powerful then he would eliminate evil. He also says that you could deny the fact that evil exists, but it does exist. He also states that the people who claim God is not all-good do not mean it and that the people who claim He is not all-powerful do not mean it, however for God to be God he has to wholly be good and powerful. His argument is then supposed to prove that there is no God. He says that we try to come up with solutions so that God can logically exist, but they all fail at creating any logical arguments.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This suggests that no action can be held as being morally good unless God commands it. However a major problem with this is that Gods commands are seen to be arbitrary. There is no moral reason for Gods will, as he invents morality. This leaves morality with no rational structure. We can exemplify this with the following example; God commands that one should honour and respect their mother and father, and this is morally right.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    God: The Existence Of God

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His argument looks at the broad sense of what God is and disregards your individual opinion on what God is if you have one. Someone can argue with the argument by saying something not completely relevant to the argument such as saying we have not actually proved the existence of God because we still do not know if he is the creator of the universe is. However, that has nothing to do with our argument. We have proved the definition and therefore existence of God; not whether or not he is the creator. Through the use of deductive argument, the strong premises have persuaded me that God does in fact…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To agnostics such as Ayer or Wittgenstein, even though one may experience God, such experience is inexpressible. They do not acknowledge the possibility of revelation of God. Geisler argues that Ayer's idea is also self-contradictory because it is neither definitional nor…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Aquinas Argument Essay

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Secondly; affirming that evil is not a “thing” created by God meant that God is not omnipotent or omniscient. Some philosophers strongly believe that He is not all powerful, all-knowing or all-good for He has limited control over, and is not willing to prevent the horrific evil happening in the world. Jackson, 2014 stated that Aquinas initially explained that evil occur as a choice, it is not something intended by God to happen and so, in the context of natural evil, it cannot be said that earthquakes or volcano eruptions are chosen by the Earth or the volcano to ensue, as these God creations does not have the knowledge or the power to choose what can occur. Natural evil is not a privation of good nor is it the absence of the ultimate good that men are able to control, rather natural evil is the normal product of God’s creation (Jackson, 2014). God made eruptions and earthquakes as the nature’s normal consequence, which consequently suggests that an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent God does not exists.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays