Three Billboards Outsider Ebbing Themes

Improved Essays
The Golden Globe’s winner for Best Motion Picture film, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri, revolves around the story of a mother renting out three billboards to display a message attacking the town’s police chief for not bringing justice to her daughter’s unsolved murder. On the surface, this movie may seem like an angry strike against the justice system, but the hidden messages can be seen as simple Christian ideas. While Three Billboards show many other theological themes, in one scene, our protagonist not only questions God’s existence, but also the reason for the existence of evil.
After seven months of anger and grieving, Mildred Hayes rents three billboards to display a message against the stagnant progress of the police investigation
…show more content…
She begins asking the animal a rhetorical question: why has an arrest still not been made? She then follows up with, “Because there ain’t no God, the whole world’s empty, and it doesn’t matter what we do to each other? I hope not” (McDonagh). It is hinted earlier in the movie that Hayes is or was a Christian, but after her daughter’s gruesome murder, it seems like her faith in God has wavered. Through this quote, Hayes seems to ask whether or not God truly exists, and if so, then why is the world evil? I interpreted Hayes’ rhetorical question as her saying that evil exists because God does not exist. In this scene, our protagonist is battling with the concept of …show more content…
If God, an all-good being, did not exist, then it would make sense for evil to exist. However, Hayes ended her rhetorical question with “I hope not”, showing that her faith had not totally disappeared (McDonagh). Nevertheless, if God did exist, he is still omnibenevolent, so why does evil, such as Hayes’ daughter’s killer, exist within His creation? According to Thomas Aquinas, “... we trace what regards the activity of those with the power of free choice to God as the cause, while only free choice, not God, causes what regards the deordination or deformity of those with the power of free choice. And that is why we say that acts of sin come from God, but sin does not” (Aquinas 148). Aquinas says that God gives us free will, but He does not cause sin; instead, sin comes from free will. Since God is all-good, He Himself can not sin, but since God gave us free will, He indirectly gave us the potential to sin. In a different reasoning, “Jesus consistently refrained from any indication of a full theodicy for humans now. Instead, he suggests, as indicated, that typical humans are not in a position now to understand God’s full purpose in allowing unjust suffering and evil” (Moser 196). Moser gives a Christological reason on theodicy by explaining man’s limited knowledge on the divine. He tells us that there is no reason for God to explain evil in man, and because of our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Timothy Keller Critique

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He furthers in stating that, “our minds can’t plumb the depths of the universe for good answers to suffering, well, then, there can’t be any! This is blind faith of a high order.”…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He talks about humans only making a disturbance towards the world and peace. Peace can only solve a bad situation , but we must show that we want it and not war. God is not going to give us that power, but that we must bring it…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, Evil and Omnipotence, J.L. Mackie begins by addressing that every argument for the existence of God shown by philosophers has had its faults. The aim of Mackie’s argument is to prove that philosophy is not capable of criticizing arguments for the existence of God. Another aim is to prove that God does not exist, thus eliminating any positions made by theologians. Mackie calls his argument the ‘problem of evil’ since it demonstrates that the conception of both an omnipotent and wholly good God lacks rational support and is therefore irrational.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How can a good God exist in a world filled with natural evil? That is the question that authors Giberson and Collins attempt to find an answer to in their essay, Insert Title Here. In their essay, the authors argue that God is not responsible for natural evil, since evolution by natural selection is fully capable of producing sinister designs in lifeforms if left to its own devices. Therefore, God’s goodness is left unblemished since he is not directly responsible for natural evil. I believe that such an argument is inconsistent.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    or she will always have a biased opinion of what is right and is wrong. My question to McCloskey is: “Where does his definition of evil come from”? Once people are on the same understanding of evil the explanation of free will be better understood. I often wonder if Atheist have a sense of something being wrong like theist have. I know that both can relate that genocide is evil doing.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In saying all of these things he hopes that we will be scared into doing nothing but good. Towards the begining of the story he says “Thus easy it is for god when he pleases to cast his enemies down to hell”. He said this for the purpose of making us understand that if we get on the wrong foot with God that he will not hesitate to send us to hell. He will not try to forgive or give…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He says that objective evil presupposes objective good, and objective good requires God. He used the straight line standard which says that man cannot call a line crooked without some idea of a straight line. He used another example which states, that the shadows prove the sunshine. You can’t have shadows without sunshine, just like you can’t have evil without good, but you can have sunshine without shadows, and good without evil. The last reason was science, he declared that science can’t be done if atheism is true.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He recognizes that humankind nature is being dependent someone other than himself/herself. God gives hope to the hopeless and protection for the…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Leibniz Vs Mackie

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mackie argues the problem of evil in his philosophy, as he believes God cannot exist in the way theists believe him to be. While he maintains this belief,…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil is a complex issue within the Catholic faith. It is difficult to put a definition to what evilness is because it is not something that can physically be touched or seen. Philosophers such as, St. Augustine and Boethius, have proposed ideas that transform the way Catholics view evil, and help to give a better understanding of faith and God. These two philosophers have expressed their opinions on this very controversial topic in depth in Augustine’s Confessions and again in the Consolation of Philosophy by Boethius. The philosophers shared certain ideas, but have come to them each in different ways.…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “God” is defined here as omnipotent and omnibenevolent. This is the definition of God that theists tend to use. The first premise of the Problem of Evil argument is that if God does exist, then God is omnipotent. This premise is just stating the theistic definition of God. The second premise of the argument is that if God is omnipotent,…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Arguments From Evil: Elliot Sober I. Introduction The reality of evil existing in our world has been questioned throughout time based on the argument that an all powerful, all knowing, and all good (all-PKG) God cannot coexist with evil. The problem of evil only appears when there is a PKG God because if God is all powerful, all knowing, and all good then how could there still be evil. Therefore, if one of those properties we removed then there would no longer be a problem because then God couldn 't prevent evil from happening.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil exists because we chose it to. We, as free agents can choose between right and wrong. Through this we can justify our actions. What kind of world would we lead if everything was already decided for us and all we would have to do is perform it? God, although knows how we will choose, plays absolutely no role in our process of choosing.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In a metaphysical sense, it would simply mean that God has all good…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    St. Thomas Aquinas’s sees his conclusion as being correct with a reflection back to his premises because God is the reason that the world is intelligent. How else can these things be possible and have purpose behind them if they aren’t being guided by someone who has structure. In quote, he states “There therefore is some intelligence which directs everything in nature towards an end, and this we call God” (PBF 44). Aquinas is basically saying overall that nothing just ends by chance, but by someone that is necessarily able to end it, which is his God. As Aquinas states within his fourth reason, he says “therefore there is something which is the cause of being, of goodness, and of whatever other perfection that there may be in things (PBF 44).…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays