• Home Page
  • Compare And Contrast Pieper And Descartes

Compare And Contrast Pieper And Descartes

Improved Essays
Show More
Pieper’s and Descartes both have different ways on how they view “the truth in all things”. Pieper stressed the close connection between moral and intellectual virtue, his main idea was that we aren’t able to create truth; instead they must belong to the truth of things given during its creation period. Descartes on the other hand has a completely different view. Pieper’s understanding of truth relates too being, while Descartes doesn’t believe in the truth of all things really in any way. Pieper’s understanding of truth in all things is complex as it has many different ways of understand it completely. First Pieper relates it to the human mind itself. He explains that in a way being and truth can nearly be replaced by each other. He explains …show more content…
Basically the human mind also has to consider what has been set forth for it to conceive. As god creates things people can accept these morals or things and believe in them, or they can choose to not believe in this things which could in a way mean they don’t accept the truth of things. He states everything conforms to God’s artistry; or his creativeness as one could say. It can be explained in two ways. Since God is all knowing, rather than things just being considered unknown you have to consider how someone accepts these certain ideologies. The second item being that God’s knowledge is creative as stated before. Pieper says it best when he states, “We are not simply declaring here, strictly speaking that God has created everything out of nothing, rather we intend to say, using an image from ancient Egyptian ontology that everything has sprung from god’s eyes” (Pieper, 44). So furthermore how a human mind receives the truth in all things and how it is presented in God’s eye are similar. For us to know the being we must know the truth which has spawned from the creative “eye” of God. This in a way ends up being a cycle and help shows how Pieper can explain his ideas. He draws from the philosophies of important figures like Aristotle and Aquinas, by using both of their ideas on being …show more content…
While Pieper is able to accept that there can be truth in all things Descartes is not able to do that. Descartes was a very eccentric philosopher who was one of the first to really question the old ideas. He strayed away from the ideas of metaphysics and Aquinas. He doesn’t really believe in what had come before him, and he found a way to find doubt in everything. Pieper is able to explain all his connections and his views are not as out there as Descartes were. Pieper constantly draws from all the old ideas. With using the ideas of being itself and even referring to the five points that Aquinas was able to use to explain God himself. Yet he does add his own touch with adding the creative touch to God which adds a new way for people to understand how God can create certain things, yet not everyone accepts these. Pieper is really able to connect the old ideas of the other philosophers with his without really straying too far from their

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Compare And Contrast Descartes And David Hume
    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Descartes And David Hume

    Essay 3 Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Rene Descartes
    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Rene Descartes

    1. I am convinced by Descartes’ argument that the self is the most certain of objects. Because his logic and reasoning are good and well augmented, and he also gives the example of the wax experiment. The wax experiment shows that our senses don’t know anything and only the intellect knows the physical things. We know more about the mind than anything we know through the senses.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Schelling's Argument Analysis
    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Schelling's Argument Analysis

    Thus, Christianity is in Schelling’s perspective the only recipient of the divine revelation that once again discloses God’s spiritual oneness to humanity. However, although he decides to prioritize a particular tradition, the result of Schelling’s exploration of monotheism is God as the unfathomable unity of the three potencies. Moreover, we have to keep in mind God’s absolute freedom as regard having or not a relationship to being, or to any form of presentation of himself. Thus, it is fair to say that in Schelling’s view God is free enough to deny himself as Trinity. Hence, on one hand the Trinity is the best presentation possible of God’s essence as it reflects the three principles in their relationship with one another and with God.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Nicholas Of Causa And Rene Descartes
    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Nicholas Of Causa And Rene Descartes

    When it comes to Nicholas of Cusa and Rene Descartes and their ideas of the infinite, the differences are many while the similarities are few. Nicholas of Cusa, who lived from 1401 to 1464, recognized the open-ended, positive aspect of nature which later led him to view the infinite as a never-ending circle; a changing and developing circle that is. In contrast, Rene Descartes, who lived from 1596 to 1650, struggled with trusting whether or not the world even exists outside of the private ego—to him, the two were blended. Descartes, later, came to the conclusion to use his own knowledge in proving certain aspects of the infinite, which would, in a way, strengthen his arguments. Despite their different approaches and ideas, in general, of the infinite, these two philosophers came to find important realizations of human nature and the world around them.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing Gassendi And Descartes
    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Comparing Gassendi And Descartes

    Each individual defines God and their relationship with God differently. While that choice is up to each person, philosophers have tried to explain the complex nature of God and how this nature is presented to the self. Gassendi and Descartes have differing opinions on how God and the concept of infinity is processed in the mind, and how their seemingly inconceivable natures are best understood. Gassendi believes that God and the infinite nature are acquired over time, but can’t be completely understood since they are beyond our comprehension. On the other hand, Descartes feels that these incomprehensible qualities of God and infinity perfectly explain why they can’t be understood, and knowing that they are incomprehensible is enough to fully…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Zhuangzi And Descartes
    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Zhuangzi And Descartes

    Therefore, Zhuangzi believed knowledge was not fixed in a manner that Descartes believed in, rather it was different for individuals based on their interpretations and experiences. As a result, Zhuangzi did not believe in any collective truth, but separate truths for each person, whereas Descartes conveys the idea that there is only one truth. Descartes stated that the only true knowledge is the knowledge one can know for certain and the rest of the knowledge is deceitful. The foundational knowledge that Descartes refers to as the only true knowledge can be considered the single truth and the knowledge gained through the senses, which he believes is deceitful and biased, for example, is an individuals truth. Therefore, Zhuangzi and Descartes have differing opinions on what is true knowledge and how many truths that are actually valid.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Descartes's Inception
    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of Descartes's Inception

    A Skeptics Inception In Descartes Skepticism he excises the idea of doubt and the never ending allurement to some sort of doubt that is within life. Descartes says that everything you know no matter how probable or improbable it is has doubt. In Descartes meditation one and two he goes over his three main points of doubt. First, he wonders if he may be crazy, secondly if he is dreaming and thirdly if he is being tricked.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Descartes Discourse On Method
    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Descartes Discourse On Method

    In part four of Descartes’ Discourse on Method, the word ‘perfect’ is used numerous times. The excessive use of the word marks its importance in Descartes argument. This part of Descartes work contains Descartes’ thoughts on God and proof of God’s existence. He is exploring the idea of a perfect being, but the word ‘perfect’ seems to take on different meanings throughout the section of Descartes deliberating on what makes a perfect being. Perfect is used in relation to doubt, in relation to God, and in relation to truth.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Searle And Descartes
    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Searle And Descartes

    Searle and Descartes being separated by nearly four centuries provides a rough landscape for a philosophical discussion to be conducted upon. Both Searle and Descartes have inherent biases based upon their location on the timeline, Searle with modern science and Descartes with religion and the church. Being that the two are opposed, I think that Searle is able to articulate effectively his positions and respond to Descartes’ claims properly. If positioned at the same location along the timeline and granted the knowledge that Searle possess, I think that Descartes, assuming he had an open mind, would agree with Searle’s propositions and subsequent conclusion.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Third Meditation Analysis
    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Descartes Third Meditation Analysis

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Contrast Spinoza And Descartes
    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Contrast Spinoza And Descartes

    According to Descartes the natural world is based on the existence of a benevolent God; Descartes’ argument discusses the natural world by using doubt, which then hones into the works of mind and body dualism. In comparison to Descartes view of the natural world, Spinoza’s work is solely based upon one ‘Universal Substance’ which is otherwise known as ‘Nature’ or ‘God’. This substance is also regarded to hold all attributes and essences in the whole world, thus making it infinite. I argue that both philosophers share certain similarities in which their arguments on the natural world corresponds to their accounted beliefs in God having all “perfections”. Although, through viewing both Descartes and Spinoza’s philosophy I feel Locke would debate in responding that both philosophers lack ’experiences’ to prove their works on the natural world and God; especially Spinoza’s debate.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Aquinas And Descartes
    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Aquinas And Descartes

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Socrates And Descartes
    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Socrates And Descartes

    Socrates and Rene Descartes are alike in their most fundamental motives but yet contrasting in results both trying to improve thinking but about two different things. One example would be how they each convey their message formal versus informal, another would be their life style and beliefs of how things should be done. Both Socrates and Descartes have completely different views on getting their desired results, and the level of risk one is willing to take to accomplish certain results. Socrates and Descartes even had vastly different upbringing, and views on which sciences are important and others’ inferior to the rest.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Rene Descartes
    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Rene Descartes

    Two philosophers that have heavily influenced the world of philosophy as we now know it, René Descartes and John Locke, have not always agreed on the same beliefs. In fact, they almost always argued on what each other felt was true except for the unlikely agreement on a few things. This brings me to one particular argument dealing with the issue on innate ideas. Descartes side of the argument believes that we born with ideas (innate ideas) and Locke believes our ideas come from experience and the senses. Ideas have to stem off of something and the only way for us to have that base for an idea is to experience it.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Analysis Of René Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy
    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Critical Analysis Of René Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings