Comparing Luke's Gospel And Mark

Good Essays
When analyzing the four gospels in the bible it is likely that Mark’s gospel was written first. It is agreed that Luke’s gospel borrowed text from Mark, therefore Luke “most probably used Mark as his primary source.” (Muddiman 134) There are instances in which Luke’s gospel differs from Mark, changing some aspects, and omitting others. In these instances, it is possible that some of these are derived from the gospel of Matthew. Furthermore, Luke adds to the gospel of Mark many occurrences which “...in varying degrees of closeness, are found also in Matthew”. (Muddiman 135). When looking at differences in Luke’s gospel from that of the gospel of Mark, it appears Luke goes into more detail to explain parable meanings. He also explains the “implication” …show more content…
Jesus’ response was that anyone that does God’s will is his brother or sister or mother. Again, Luke goes into more detail explaining the circumstances surrounding the reason Jesus said this. Mark describes Jesus mother and brethren calling for him. Coupled with Mark explaining that Jesus said that anyone who does the will of the God is his brother. Both gospels agree on those facts, by contrast Luke adds one small detail that makes all the difference. Luke describes Jesus saying “my brethren are these which hear the word of God, and do it.” Luke explains further to be his brother, sister, or mother you cannot simply follow the will of God. Luke cites that Jesus says you need to “hear the word of God and do it”. This is a much taller order then simply doing the will of God because the word of God is broad and has many facets. Whereas doing that the will of God is in your life may not be as detailed. Luke takes liberty to expound where he felt needed more explanation. This may be since his audience were gentiles. At the time that he wrote the gospel of Luke the Jewish has largely “rejected the gospel” (137), causing them to focus their attention to the gentiles. Given the circumstances, Luke seems to have favored going into greater detail explaining principles and doctrine otherwise left up to interpretation in the gospel of Mark. Luke had taken ideas from the gospel of Mark and of Matthew and added his own commentary. Luke expounded on why he believes Jesus gave his command on which the debtor loved more and on being his brother and sister. His extra details seemed to be from his desire to win over more gentiles by tailoring the text to explain details of Jesus’ life to the

Related Documents

  • Better Essays

    the parables often times have the same core ideas, the different words and tones used in each of the different gospels completely change the way the parables are read. In the mustard seed parable, Matthew, Mark, Luke and Thomas all have the same essence, but the different expressions make them very distinctive. Through comparing the similarities in differences between these four Gospels, it can be deducted that similar sources and references were used in constructing the parable. The first comparison…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first glance, the three Synoptic Gospels seem so similar. Matthew, Mark, and Luke tell roughly the same stories of Jesus (and the same stories that Jesus told himself). Their overall messages are the same. The Lesson of the Fig Tree (§ 220) warns people that God’s Kingdom is near and in The Confession at Caesarea Philippi and The First Prediction of the Passion (§ 122) Jesus asks his disciples who people think he is, before ordering them to keep his true identity to themselves. They tell the…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The four Gospels in the bible are accredited to four writers: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. The gospels were split into two groups, which consisted of the synoptic Gospels and John’s gospel. The synoptic gospels consisted of Matthew, Mark and Luke’s gospels. The reason for this was because of the difference between the writings. The synoptic gospels were considered similar, but John did not really contain the same similarities that the other three writings had in common. The two works that I am going…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays