Compare And Contrast Bucher And Thomas Paine

Improved Essays
The American Revolution was a time of great controversy. Thomas Paine, who migrated from England, wrote an extremely persuasive pamphlet that said the colonists should fight for liberty. Whereas Jonathon Boucher, who was a Loyalist, wrote that the colonists should not revolt. While these two authors had different views, they both wrote excerpts that were relevant to the American Revolution. One of the reasons Paine’s pamphlet was so popular, was the fact that it was written in a language that was not directed specifically towards the educated elite. He used analogies such as, “We may as well assert that a child has thrived upon milk, that it is to never have meat…” (#31; p. 98) Having used a language that the general knew broadened his audience, and therefore expanded his influence. Paine had the advantage of having had the same thoughts as the Patriots who wanted independence. With the majority of the colonists being Patriots, Paine’s argument may have been what finally made fence-sitters choose a side. Paine stated that nature was against hereditary rights, “otherwise she would not frequently turn it into ridicule by giving mankind an ass for a lion.” (#31; p. 97) The colonists were so appalled by the king’s taxations that directly calling out the absurdity of the king’s authority, could have persuaded most colonists to revolt. …show more content…
97) Based on this statement he implied that he was going to use a logical approach to defend his argument, but rather than logic he used emotional appeal. Instead of stating facts, he personifies Great Britain as a mother. While he claims that that term was created by the King, he still uses it to support his statement. “Even brutes do not devour their young...” (#31; p.99) With this statement he is saying that a mother would never do such a thing, using emotion rather than using

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Paine was an emigrant from England who wrote a persuasive pamphlet in 1776, known as Common Sense. this was a political argument for American Independence, written to the colonists in hopes to get them on board with separation from Great Britain. Samuel Seabury was “a native of Connecticut” who wrote a series of pamphlets arguing against Independence, in 1775, to the colonists, to prove why they needed to stay joined with Great Britain. While some may think the two authors, Thomas Paine and Samuel Seabury, wrote similarly in their documents as they both agreed there was a good amount of problems between Great Britain and the colonies, they had many different opinions, including: opinions on separation, the outcome of separation and the…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his time, Thomas Paine wrote and made a copious amounts of valid points when it came to the colonies and England’s government at the time. In his pamphlet, “Common Sense,” Paine argued over many things when it came to the government, but one of his most notable arguments had to have been when he made several points leading to his theories that the colonies should separate from Great Britain. In his argument for independence, he made quite a bit of points, but his three most effective points would have to be that, while Britain protected the colonies during hardships, they only did it to have a gain on their financial standpoint. His second point which is that, any relations with Great Britain cannot exist, because as long as they do…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the American Colonies were on the verge of independence, almost the entirety of of the colonies’ population wanted nothing but a reconciliation with Britain. It was not until a man by the name Thomas Paine wrote a pamphlet entitled Common Sense that the colonists were fully swayed onto the revolutionary side. Made for the common man, this pamphlet was used as more than just a tool to begin the shifting of the tides towards patriots; it was one of the first extremely successful published persuasive essays. Within its pages, this pamphlet contained irrefutable arguments against the king. Whether it be grievances fueled by unfair tariffs, or arguments that further supported the need for separation from the British, Thomas Paine found a…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was able to get through to his audience by targeting the emotional and logical sides of the subject. He listed facts that no-one could deny and he also used anecdotes and aphorisms to get his point across in different ways. One writing strategy that Paine uses to get this point…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paine says that reconciliation would bring “The ruin of the Continent.” This does not mean that Pain wants America and Britain to forever be at war, but he is saying that in order to bring overall peace, America needs to be its own nation in order to thrive on its own and prevent further fighting. This will prevent emigrants from going to their colony of bad governing and constant fighting. One of his reasons is that the British has a monarchy rule with an unfair kind, and America wants to be a democracy. Paine does not think that the king has the right to tell everyone that “[They] shall make no laws but what [he pleases]” He then states that with all of the fighting and tension, it would be nearly impossible to move forward and the two colonies would eventually just…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Instead, the people on the land would form a society to teach other how to develop the land. Society as a substitute for a government could have persuaded individuals in the New World with no prior knowledge of ruining a colony except previous government styles from England. By outlining the mistakes and consequences Britain experienced a government rule, Paine intended to show examples of what European powers and government would do in the New World. He continued to examine the European constitution with three major flaws in the system. The first points show two flaws; monarchical and aristocratical tyranny.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He attempted to have the colonists imagine the situation and see how much more they’d get out of it after the struggles and obstacles. Paine also states “Not all the treasures of the world...could have induced me to support an offensive war...what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king...an individual villain...an army of them... we shall find no difference, why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other” (Paine 46). He used descriptive words such as offensive, threaten, villain, punish, etc. to add more strength to his points and with descriptive words, it helps persuade the colonists to fight and do what they need to do to achieve freedom. These words help his persuasion because the colonists see words such as war and connect it to villain or army, and realize there is no bad…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Paine did not write Common Sense to provide reasoning and justification for the unfair taxation of the colonies. The work’s purpose was to introduce and provide an argument for the idea of completely separating from the British Empire. Also important is that, throughout the article, Paine bases these arguments in basic reasoning, or common sense, hence the name, probably so the common people could more easily understand the points he is trying to make. For example, there was a standard portion of the work that Paine spent on simply addressing claims against a revolution, such as, the argument that it was wrong to rebel against Britain because it was the “parent country.” To this claim Paine states, ever so passionately, “Then even more shame…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Paine spread his thoughts and ideas on American independence in his pamphlet, “Common Sense,” which advocated the independence of the American colonies from Britain and had a great influence to those living in America surrounding the time of 1776. Paine grew up as a son of an English Quaker, and was an apprentice of his father’s in his earlier years, but by 1774 Paine was in America supporting the separation between the colonies and Britain as he became the political philosopher and writer as we know him by today. From reading “Common Sense,” it is clear that Paine believed in the colonists’ right to revolt, as he passionately states the reasoning and logic behind his ideas. Many of his arguments are well thought out and very effective…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1.What were Thomas Paine’s views on government? How did his writing convince colonists to fight for independence? Thomas Paine’s views on government, as he said in his pamphlet “Common Sense”, was that all people had the right to have a choice in government and all decisions that came from it. He called for the formation of a republic, where power came from the people and not from a corrupt monarch. Paine’s writing convinced colonists to fight for independence because it pointed out all the wrongdoings of Britain.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paine puts the theoretical attack in Biblical terms, arguing that the monarchy originated in sin. Paine presents his specific problems with the British monarchy with his attack on hereditary succession, and also lists his many grievances with the present king. Another common piece of Paine's argument is that America will eventually be independent. Sometimes he states this as a fact, and other times he seems to be persuading the reader, detailing the extent of the rift separating the colonies and the English king. Since many people were unsure about the idea of a revolution that would sever them from the king, establishing the principle of American independence was an integral part of Paine’s arguments.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing.” By doing this, Henry is able to prove his point simply on why war is necessary, without extending his speech drastically as Paine. This once again shows the superiority of effectiveness of Henry’s speech over Paine’s. Although both Thomas Paine and Patrick Henry were great writers of the American Revolution era, Henry’s speech was overall more successful in promoting men to fight for independence.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paine Starts by calling out tories and questioning them by asking “Why is it that the enemy have left the New England provinces, and made these middle ones the seat of war?” he then answers that question by saying “New england is not infested with tories, we are” This provokes and angers the colonists by telling them that the biggest obstacle they are facing are there own people who are in the british army. This question is answered with such passion by paine that the tories that were reading this would fear what paine is saying as he tells everyone that they are cowards and severely criticizes them, in order to persuade them that what they are doing is wrong and they should support the fight for freedom. He is able to create an example for the colonists to act toward tories and any tories that heard of this could be frightened out of loyalty to britain because they would be abused if they were to obey the rules of great britain. He also asks “If a thief breaks into my house... and to ‘bind me to all cases whatsoever to his absolute will, am I to suffer it?”…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that it is foolish that they, “[Have] to be always running three or four thousand miles with a tale or a petition…” (Paine 25). He sees Britain’s distance and size compared to America as absurd so it does not make sense that they are the ones controlling…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the pamphlet, Paine uses moral reference to God, and refers to God as a way to inspire and convince plainly to the colonists the importance of American Revolutionary war against the king and Great Britain. Paine used rational examples to oppose traditional government, specifically the authority of the British government, and tried to convince the colonists the king’s tyrannical actions. He speaks openly about having “little superstition” yet uses God as a reference to connect to the people, and emphasizes how “God Almighty” would not leave the Colonists unsupported from the British “military destruction” (W. W Norton & Company Inc. 648). By contrasting the King as a “murder”, Paine reminds the Colonists the tyrannical, unrighteous actions the King has imposed on the people such as the unfair right to “bind us [America] in all cases whatsoever” as an act similar to that of “slavery” (W. W Norton & Company Inc. 648). Moreover, Paine use of God and religion is more of way to influence the Colonists opinions than act as a sermon to purpose God as shaming or demeaning the cause of the Revolution.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays