Thomas Paine Common Sense Analysis

Superior Essays
Register to read the introduction… To Paine, society is everything good that the people can accomplish by joining together. Paine makes it clear that he is not particularly fond of government, whose only purpose is "restraining our vices". One theme throughout this work is Paine’s view of government as a necessary evil. Paine says that government has its origins in the evil of man, and that its sole purpose is to protect life, liberty and property, and that a government should be judged on the extent to which it accomplishes this goal. His reasoning for this is that he feels the “natural state” of man is to live without government, so there should only be government to alleviate the problems of man. If a government fails in this task, it is blameworthy. And in this is where he finds his foundation for rebellion.

Tying in with this is another recurring theme of “natural state.” Many parts of Common Sense detail imagined “natural states” in
…show more content…
Paine puts the theoretical attack in Biblical terms, arguing that the monarchy originated in sin. Paine presents his specific problems with the British monarchy with his attack on hereditary succession, and also lists his many grievances with the present king. Another common piece of Paine's argument is that America will eventually be independent. Sometimes he states this as a fact, and other times he seems to be persuading the reader, detailing the extent of the rift separating the colonies and the English king. Since many people were unsure about the idea of a revolution that would sever them from the king, establishing the principle of American independence was an integral part of Paine’s arguments. Only by convincing his readers that American would inevitably be independent one day could he make a case for a full

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In his pamphlet Common Sense, Thomas Paine gives several arguments to convince the colonist’s on why they should separate from British rule. He is effective on persuading them to do so because of his use of facts, arguments, and common sense. He is also effective because he appeals to his audience by implementing the bible and understandable metaphors in his text. He argued the causes of wanting Independence was British’s cruel treatment, it would be beneficial to the colonies, and America should not be governed by a small country that is miles away.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the text goes on, he connects to the colonists hardships, stress, and anger which has been increasing after the constant neglect of the british empire. Although independence seemed radical at the time, after using pathos which appeal to the emotions of of the reader makes the concept somewhat relatable. , “A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people” argues Paine and insists that the reason why the people are so afraid to trust a government that summoned one leader to rule is because they are constantly questioning its…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Paine’s views on government, as he said in his pamphlet “Common Sense”, was that all people had the right to have a choice in government and all decisions that came from it. He called for the formation of a republic, where power came from the people and not from a corrupt monarch. Paine’s writing convinced colonists to fight for independence because it pointed out all the wrongdoings of Britain. His ideas pointed called out for the rejection of a monarchy and the embracing of a republic which fell on listening ears.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is common for society to think the igniter of American Independence was Thomas Paine, who was the anonymous writer who imposed the colonist dependence on the King. Common Sense enlightened the population, encouraged them towards independence, and altered the opinions of Americans. This influenced Americans to oppose their original views of the King. Political leaders where inspired to take action. Paine’s confidence in equality and liberty persuaded the Declaration of Independence. Continuously quoting the Bible, Paine makes very strong argument he wrote in the language of the people to undoubtedly get his views across. Colonies declaring independence when they are physically larger than Britain, and are being abused as the King 's subjects…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his piece, Thomas Paine strongly expresses a persuasive outlook as to why the colonists should fight for their independence. He believes that their willing right to be free shall not be put aside and that their abilities to achieve their freedom may be affected by factors such as God, the British, or even just simply the fact that Paine described the reasoning to get the colonists to fight in such an expressive way. Throughout this piece, Paine’s goal was to persuade the colonists to strive for liberty. To support his argument, Paine utilizes religious beliefs, descriptive language, and the recognition of the counter argument.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He wanted the government to be a democracy, in which every civilian would have a say in the government. Also, he said that another purpose of government is to provide security for the people. Paine thought, if all people acted morally, government would not be necessary. However, since people do not act that way, government would be a necessary evil. Lastly, Paine claims that his view of government is based on the principle, "that the more simple anything is, the less liable it is to be disordered." He presented government as an institution whose function is to restrain the evil in…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paine asserts that mankind was originally in a state of equality, and, therefore, present inequalities must have been brought about by some circumstance. These things were very likely to happen during this time because Thomas Paine was willing to do anything or have anything happen to have his pamphlet passed. During this act one thing that Paine would say was “Government as a necessary evil….Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one… ( Common Sense) ”. This is true because the government can be evil and will do anything to protect their nation without thinking twice about the people. One could tell that Paine was not fond of the government because he felt as if they were not doing anything to do things better in some way the government was making things worse. The age of hereditary monarchy and aristocracy was over. People were citizens and not subjects, and were born with equal natural rights; that the people created, written constitutions that defined and limited their governments; that these written…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paine argued that “Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil” (Thomas Paine), because it only forms out of need to counter human vices. His primary example was the British monarchy, and constitution. Paine pointed out the flaws in the way the English government was set up from the broken checks and balances system to the unjust succession method. As Paine saw it the English constitution was “farcical” (Thomas Paine), because in the end the commoners held no real power “the same constitution which gives the Commons a power to check the King by withholding the supplies, gives afterwards the King a power to check the Commons” (Thomas Paine), rendering them useless. This gave too much power to the King, and the commoners weren’t given fair representation even though they were the majority, laws were often in favor of the rich.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In summary, being seen as a rebel trying to fight off Britain, or a person seeking their well-deserved independence can be the difference in allies, in trust, and in the time it takes to get what you were originally out for. The point intended here was freedom. Paine openly admits that Britain is a very free society, but with his philosopher-like thinking, he felt like we could refine our Colonies to find our own independence aside from what Britain’s input is. Freedom comes with restraint though. Government agrees sweetly with the simple acts of independence and assures that chaos does not run amuck in society. Thomas Paine advocated for freedom and a structured government in Common…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Paine Analysis

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Under those circumstances, Paine took up the task of writing about the factors that leaded to a monarchical system. Because Paine wasn’t afraid to face the truth with logical reasoning, certain groups of colonists, who were hesitant to do anything, were unprepared to challenge the king, blatantly defend, or accept monarchical sovereignty. Principles are the foundation to strengthen people 's voice against injustice, but “instead of being ingrafted on the principles of the former, assumes to exist for itself, and acts by partialities of favour and oppression, it becomes the cause of mischiefs it ought to prevent.” (pg. 110). Colonists seldom experienced freedom equally, except for the high class who had a title in…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the reasons Paine’s pamphlet was so popular, was the fact that it was written in a language that was not directed specifically towards the educated elite. He used analogies such as, “We may as well assert that a child has thrived upon milk, that it is to never have meat…” (#31; p. 98) Having used a language that the general knew broadened his audience, and therefore expanded his influence. Paine had the advantage of having had the same thoughts as the Patriots who wanted independence. With the majority of the colonists being Patriots, Paine’s argument may have been what finally made fence-sitters choose a side. Paine stated that nature was against hereditary rights, “otherwise she would not frequently turn it into ridicule by giving mankind an ass for a lion.” (#31; p. 97) The colonists were so appalled by the king’s taxations that directly calling out the absurdity of the king’s authority, could have persuaded most colonists to revolt.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Paine was not only a revolutionary, but a political activists and philosopher. Through Common Sense, Thomas Paine immensely influenced and inspired the rebels in 1776 to declare independence from Great Britain. He highlights the many disadvantages of more concentrated forms of ruling and compares them to the advantages of being independent. Thomas Paine opens up his narrative by differentiating government from society. Society, according to Thomas, is something thats desired and works with the motive to fulfill everyones needs. Government, on the other hand is a ‘necessary evil,’ and is existent only to stray away immoral behavior. As populations grow, governance through elections deems necessary for the stability of a society. Thomas…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his pamphlet Paine points out wrong doings of King George III that persuade Americans that the king does not care about the colonies well being, and that the English monarchy will only act in self interest. This rebuts any other arguments that attempt to show that the English will protect the colonies. When the argument of the advantages of monarchy come about, Paine tells that even though the simplicity of monarchy can be seen as an advantage the English constitution is far too complex. Again, he rebuts arguments to do with the king such as: the king is checked on by others. Paine shows that there is a fault in this argument by stating if the king must be monitored than he cannot be trusted, and that if he is being monitored by the people, than the people are better fit for the crown than the king is. Additionally, Paine suggest that the English constitution needs no mention of a king, since he believes a country without a king could be more prosperous and peaceful. He supports this with Holland’s period of no kings in which during that time there was more peace than any monarchy in Europe. Paine also mentions that a king is not supported by the rights of nature or scripture, and creates the question of what really justifies a monarchy, and even includes it as a sin of the Jewish. By denouncing the king, Paine expunges the basis of English government, which makes it easier for the American people to understand and agree with Paine’s opinion. By stating that decent monarchs have been rare, it allows the American people to lose their faith in the monarchy. Moreover, Paine looks at arguments from a logical perspective when he talks about the various difficulties that come from being ruled from thousands of miles away, and gaining no benefits. Paine suggests that America will make few friends, but gain the enemies of Britain if they do not separate. This could…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the pamphlet, Paine uses moral reference to God, and refers to God as a way to inspire and convince plainly to the colonists the importance of American Revolutionary war against the king and Great Britain. Paine used rational examples to oppose traditional government, specifically the authority of the British government, and tried to convince the colonists the king’s tyrannical actions. He speaks openly about having “little superstition” yet uses God as a reference to connect to the people, and emphasizes how “God Almighty” would not leave the Colonists unsupported from the British “military destruction” (W. W Norton & Company Inc. 648). By contrasting the King as a “murder”, Paine reminds the Colonists the tyrannical, unrighteous actions the King has imposed on the people such as the unfair right to “bind us [America] in all cases whatsoever” as an act similar to that of “slavery” (W. W Norton & Company Inc. 648). Moreover, Paine use of God and religion is more of way to influence the Colonists opinions than act as a sermon to purpose God as shaming or demeaning the cause of the Revolution. Especially near the end, Paine summarizes, “I thank God that I fear not. I see no real cause for fear. I know our situation well, and can see the way out of it.” (W. W Norton & Company Inc.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Common Sense” by Thomas Paine was a very important document in the starting of the American Revolution. Paine’s 48 page pamphlet was published on January 10th, 1776 and explained why the thirteen colonies should break off from England. In the first section, Paine explains that as society begins to flourish, a government is more necessary to prevent the “natural evil” he saw in man. The second section of this document points out that all men are equal and that the idea that kings and queens are more superior than everyone else is a false one. Paine then describes some problems that monarchies have caused in past times. He also argues against the constitutional monarchy, an idea promoted by John Locke. Paine says that the limits given in a “mixed…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays