What Are The Differences Between Inglis And Thomas Paine

Improved Essays
In the eighteenth century, America was fed up with the British empire and thought they deserved their freedom. Although Thomas Paine and Charles Inglis both had good arguments and logical reason, Paine had a patriotic vision on why America would be better off as an independent nation that Charles Inglis did not see. Paine's argument consists of his views reconciliation, preventing war, and even the downside of independance from Britian.
To describe the possible alliance between the British and Americans, Paine uses the word “Reconciliation”. Paine says that reconciliation would bring “The ruin of the Continent.” This does not mean that Pain wants America and Britain to forever be at war, but he is saying that in order to bring overall peace, America needs to be its own nation in order to thrive on its own and prevent further fighting. This will prevent emigrants from going to their colony of bad governing and constant fighting. One of his reasons is that the British has a monarchy rule with an unfair kind, and America wants to be a democracy. Paine does not think that the king has the right to tell everyone that “[They] shall make no laws but what [he pleases]” He then states that with all of the fighting and tension, it would be nearly impossible to move forward and the two colonies would eventually just
…show more content…
One of his reasons that America should be independent is that they were already at war with the British. In his section “Preventing War”, he is saying that freedom from the British empire would only make the relationship with America and Britain better. Because the Britians and the Americans are already at war, America becoming independent and letting the british continue their monarchy rule would only prevent the current war between the two colonies from getting

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    British Dbq Essay

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pain argued that the french and indian war wasn 't fought to benefit the colonists but instead great britain,when he states“Her motive was interest not attachment; she did not protect us from our enemies on our account, but from her enemies on her own account. ”Pain also argues that Britain should not have control over the colonies because the 13 colonies were a different society compared to Britain,when he states“There is something very absurd in supposing a Continent to be perpetually governed by an island... England and America reverse the order of nature, it is evident they belong to different systems- England to Europe, America to itself. ”Pain’s strongest argument was simply when he states “A government of our own is our natural rights.”…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One could tell that Paine was not fond of the government because he felt as if they were not doing anything to do things better in some way the government was making things worse. The age of hereditary monarchy and aristocracy was over. People were citizens and not subjects, and were born with equal natural rights; that the people created, written constitutions that defined and limited their governments; that these written…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Comparing Thomas Paine and Patrick Henry The subject of the American Revolutionary War brings about many names into mind. Of the Revolutionary writers, perhaps two of the most significant, the most influential, would be Patrick Henry, the author of the “Speech to the Virginia Convention,” and Thomas Paine of the “Crisis, No. 1” There are many similarities between the speeches of the two writers. Both deemed Great Britain as a tyranny, claimed that the people of the United States deserved independence and freedom, and urged for war effort.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Paine was an emigrant from England who wrote a persuasive pamphlet in 1776, known as Common Sense. this was a political argument for American Independence, written to the colonists in hopes to get them on board with separation from Great Britain. Samuel Seabury was “a native of Connecticut” who wrote a series of pamphlets arguing against Independence, in 1775, to the colonists, to prove why they needed to stay joined with Great Britain. While some may think the two authors, Thomas Paine and Samuel Seabury, wrote similarly in their documents as they both agreed there was a good amount of problems between Great Britain and the colonies, they had many different opinions, including: opinions on separation, the outcome of separation and the…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states that the colonies will, “…feel like a man who continues putting off some unpleasant business from day to day…” (Paine 25). Paine writes this because he believes it is only a matter of time that they separate from the British therefore he says it should be done at once because it will torment them until they do…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paine Starts by calling out tories and questioning them by asking “Why is it that the enemy have left the New England provinces, and made these middle ones the seat of war?” he then answers that question by saying “New england is not infested with tories, we are” This provokes and angers the colonists by telling them that the biggest obstacle they are facing are there own people who are in the british army. This question is answered with such passion by paine that the tories that were reading this would fear what paine is saying as he tells everyone that they are cowards and severely criticizes them, in order to persuade them that what they are doing is wrong and they should support the fight for freedom. He is able to create an example for the colonists to act toward tories and any tories that heard of this could be frightened out of loyalty to britain because they would be abused if they were to obey the rules of great britain. He also asks “If a thief breaks into my house... and to ‘bind me to all cases whatsoever to his absolute will, am I to suffer it?”…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his time, Thomas Paine wrote and made a copious amounts of valid points when it came to the colonies and England’s government at the time. In his pamphlet, “Common Sense,” Paine argued over many things when it came to the government, but one of his most notable arguments had to have been when he made several points leading to his theories that the colonies should separate from Great Britain. In his argument for independence, he made quite a bit of points, but his three most effective points would have to be that, while Britain protected the colonies during hardships, they only did it to have a gain on their financial standpoint. His second point which is that, any relations with Great Britain cannot exist, because as long as they do…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through several “repeated injuries and usurpations,” relations between colonial America and Imperial Britain in were at an unprecedented low, making an uprising among the discontent American public increasingly unavoidable. This coming revolution was substantial in that it was not merely a rebellion against a powerful government, but a total attack against the old-world ideas of monarchy and social class. Two influential men, both long critical of the English crown, published two of the most important works of writing in American history, Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, and Thomas Jefferson’s The Declaration of Independence. In reviewing their respective works, readers can see how these two enlightenment thinkers present reason in differing ways…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He attempted to have the colonists imagine the situation and see how much more they’d get out of it after the struggles and obstacles. Paine also states “Not all the treasures of the world...could have induced me to support an offensive war...what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king...an individual villain...an army of them... we shall find no difference, why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other” (Paine 46). He used descriptive words such as offensive, threaten, villain, punish, etc. to add more strength to his points and with descriptive words, it helps persuade the colonists to fight and do what they need to do to achieve freedom. These words help his persuasion because the colonists see words such as war and connect it to villain or army, and realize there is no bad…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paine opposed the divided form of government and finds that a simpler government is a better government. This is because then people would know who is responsible for making decisions. Paine says the British system “hath all the distinctions of an house divided against itself.” Loyalist yet to see the faults in the British government. Paine feels that people are loyal to Britain because of hometown pride, but also sees no point in remaining loyal because all of Britain’s decisions are in the well-being of Britain, not America.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Thomas Paine, Common Sense, p. 104). Paine is revealing a point, that colonial American government cannot coexist with the English government. Whereas America is striving for equal opportunities for all, England has a set system for the people in power passed through generations. Other political writers, such as Noah Webster say what he thinks makes America so different from England is that America is “Removed from the fears of a foreign invasion and conquest, they are not exposed to the convulsions that shake other governments; and the principles of freedom are so general and energetic, as to exclude the possibility of a change in our republican constitutions.” (Noah Webster, On Equality, p. 122).…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the American Colonies were on the verge of independence, almost the entirety of of the colonies’ population wanted nothing but a reconciliation with Britain. It was not until a man by the name Thomas Paine wrote a pamphlet entitled Common Sense that the colonists were fully swayed onto the revolutionary side. Made for the common man, this pamphlet was used as more than just a tool to begin the shifting of the tides towards patriots; it was one of the first extremely successful published persuasive essays. Within its pages, this pamphlet contained irrefutable arguments against the king. Whether it be grievances fueled by unfair tariffs, or arguments that further supported the need for separation from the British, Thomas Paine found a…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Paine was not only a revolutionary, but a political activists and philosopher. Through Common Sense, Thomas Paine immensely influenced and inspired the rebels in 1776 to declare independence from Great Britain. He highlights the many disadvantages of more concentrated forms of ruling and compares them to the advantages of being independent. Thomas Paine opens up his narrative by differentiating government from society. Society, according to Thomas, is something thats desired and works with the motive to fulfill everyones needs.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, Paine looks at arguments from a logical perspective when he talks about the various difficulties that come from being ruled from thousands of miles away, and gaining no benefits. Paine suggests that America will make few friends, but gain the enemies of Britain if they do not separate. This could…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paine puts the theoretical attack in Biblical terms, arguing that the monarchy originated in sin. Paine presents his specific problems with the British monarchy with his attack on hereditary succession, and also lists his many grievances with the present king. Another common piece of Paine's argument is that America will eventually be independent. Sometimes he states this as a fact, and other times he seems to be persuading the reader, detailing the extent of the rift separating the colonies and the English king. Since many people were unsure about the idea of a revolution that would sever them from the king, establishing the principle of American independence was an integral part of Paine’s arguments.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays