A Full Vindication Of Measures Of Congress Analysis

Great Essays
A Full Vindication of the Measures of Congress “A full vindication of the measures of Congress” is a letter written by Alexander Hamilton to the people of the colonies, part of which is addressed directly to the farmers. This was written mainly in response to the allegations, insults, and propaganda that the so-called “Farmer” had made against the actions of the first continental Congress in America through his letter that had been printed in the newspapers of the time. In his letter, Hamilton takes a systematic approach in responding to the accusations of the “Farmer” and defending the judgements and decisions of the Continental Congress by the use of logic, examples, and indisputable proof. With the Coercive Acts in place, which in the eyes …show more content…
While trying to maintain a level-headed approach towards the “Farmer’s” accusations, Hamilton almost entirely disagrees with him and his ideas. He does a good job explaining the facts that the readers need to know with regards to the democratic status of the colonies with the existence of the Continental Congress as opposed to if it had not been there. Hamilton completely supports the decisions that the Continental Congress has made on non-importation and non-exportation. That is, as far as he is concerned, the only way possible to get through to the British is by taking something really dear from them away. He further assesses the geopolitical status of the British and concludes that they simply do not possess the resources to stage a full-out war on the colonies. Therefore, again, as stated throughout this text, he believes the only way for the colonies to become independent and free of the slavery imposed by the British is by boycotting all trades with this empire. This, although on the short term as he admits it himself might cause some hardships for the American settlers, overtime it will benefit them and the generations to come socially, politically, and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Samuel Seabury and Alexander Hamilton’s exchange debates the logic behind the colonists’ desires to spilt from Great Britain and reveal that Seabury presents a by far more logical argument for the continued relationship between Great Britain and the colonies. Samuel Seabury’s “A View of the Controversy between Great Britain and her Colonies” is a response to Alexander Hamilton’s “A Full Vindication of the Measures of Congress, from the Calumnies of their Enemies.” In fact, the dialogue between Seabury and Hamilton extends even farther back to Seabury’s “Free Thoughts on the Proceedings of the Continental Congress.” All of Hamilton’s and Seabury’s communication centers around the debate of whether the colonies should break from Great Britain. Both Hamilton and Seabury were residents of the colonies, but disagreed greatly, as will be proven throughout this paper, as to whether the colonies should secede.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Cherokee Removal

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Perdue and Green’s “The Cherokee Removal, A Brief History with Documents” is an introduction to the social and political period surrounding the removal of Cherokee Indians. The authors’ inclusion of many documents, shares with readers, the Indian voices as well as key political figures’ position on sovereign governance. This complex period is successfully outlined by Perdue and Green, with a chronological account of the Indians’ first encounter with Europeans through the inevitable journey, “Trail of Tears”.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The American Revolution was caused by much more than the simple concept of no taxation without representation; its roots can be found dozens of years prior, in 1763 and the years that followed, as well as back to the early history of colonial North America. Two authors and historians, Colin Calloway, who wrote The Scratch of a Pen: 1763 and the Transformation of North America, and Eric Foner, who authored Give Me Liberty! an American History, offer two comprehensive viewpoints into the origins of the American Revolution and a historical analysis of how the events and conflicts which took place during the time periods influenced the Revolution’s arrival. Colin Calloway’s The Scratch of a Pen begins in the year of 1763, with Calloway defining…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Narrative of Commercial Life,” T. H. Breen explores economic and cultural changes in eighteenth century British North America that came about after the French and Indian War. Breen argues that those changes informed colonial protest movements, most notably nonimportation agreements, and that those “specific styles of resistance” caused colonists to unite and “...to reimagine themselves within an independent commercial empire” (Breen 472). Staughton Lynd and David Waldstreicher’s article “Free Trade, Sovereignty, and Slavery” begins with a discussion of how both modern historians and early Americans have viewed the causes and ideology of the American Revolution. Lynd and Waldstreicher claim that the main contentions are whether the Americans…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jefferson’s idea of an ideal society was revolved around the common man. (MP 165) He praised the “yeoman farmer” and trusted in their discretion about what America could become. “He felt that urbanization, industrial factories, and financial speculation would serve to rob the common man of his independence and economic freedom.” (MP165) Jefferson feared the opposite of what Hamilton did, he feared the national government gaining power.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Jefferson, one of the most popular founding fathers, the main author of the Declaration of Independence, and the third president of the United States of America was revered by his contemporaries and is still to this day a well respected figure in American history. But, this does not mean that the man had no faults. Often in todays world Thomas Jefferson is looked back upon and has been scrutinized by many for his apparent hypocrisy on matters such as slavery and on what he believed limitations of the federal government were to be. Although some of Jefferson’s past can be dark and questionable, he was no hypocrite, but a man who understood that his decisions would have lasting effects on the new country, and that putting his own personal…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saul Cornell’s book titled “A Well Regulated Militia” explains the right of a citizen to bear arm. An important law made for the protection of rights for citizens of the United State is the second Amendment. The second amendment allowed people to maintain the security of their families, and properties. Citizens can also arm themselves in other to be part of a militia which is well regulated.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His main points are such: that the limited land and resources of England forced corruption to spawn, America has great potential to make the most of the land that is accessible…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the late 1700s, the Federalists Papers, essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay spoke volumes to the colonial citizens. Divided into factions, the Federalists and Anti-federalists had their own views on how the government should be run. Avid supporters of the Constitution, the Federalists made a name for themselves, disguising the fact they were committed to a nationalist government. On the other hand, the Anti-federalists focused more on the true principles of the Revolution. In articles seventy-eight and seventy-nine published under Publis and Brutus, the authors clarified the structure, powers, appointments and independence of the judiciary branch.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the end of the American Revolution in 1776, America broke free of all of its ties to the corrupt government of England, inciting political, social, and economic reform. American leaders explored the radical idea of democracy and the extension of the rights of citizens to distinguish the American government from the British government. American leaders soon realized that a centralized government, much like that of England 's, was inevitable. The democratic ideals, which pushed the American Revolution also pushed women and slaves to fight for their rights and freedoms. Such protest led to the radical social development in the generations to come.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Paine believed the colonies should have rebelled in order for them to become free. Paine wrote, “Reconciliation is now a fallacious dream.” He believed there was no possible way to make up the disagreements with Great Britain and the only way to solve anything was to separate so the colonies could be free. On the other hand, Samuel Seabury believed the colonies were intentionally causing problems with Great Britain just so they could rebel. He included in his argument against Independence, “When nothing seems to be consulted, but how to perplex, irritate, and affront, the British Ministry, Parliament, Nation and King?”…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A major argument among historians is whether or not the American Revolution is justified or unjustified- the overwhelming evidence suggested throughout history suggest that is not. Yes it may be true that Britain started to act very overprotective over their colonies, limiting the control and freedom that can be exercised throughout the region, but they were mostly looking out for the colonists best interest at heart. The problem was that they were so invested into the colonists lives which they were trying to avoid this whole time. But throughout history, the British has been there for the colonists throughout everything. Any protection, good, money, etc.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the late 18th and early 19th century, Jefferson and Hamilton explicitly exemplify their views about the agricultural and industrial economy. During the Revolutionary war, Americans boycotted manufactured goods that the British made which then lead to the Intolerable Acts in…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamilton was a staunch supporter of an energetic government that amassed political, economic and military power. He wanted to ensure that the national government superseded all other lower governments in every aspect. Hamilton’s proposition was an all-powerful government that ruled over its people in totality. This was bound to ensure that the needs of the nation came ahead of personal interests. Therefore, the government would actively get involved in all affairs such as those concerning the military and the economy.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Patrick Henry’s “Speech in the Virginia Convention,” he talks about the reasons why Great Britain should be removed of their authoritative powers, and give colonial America independence from tyranny, which is because of restrictive binds the British tyrants weigh down upon the colonial government. Patrick Henry reinstates the American passion of obtaining freedom from the presence of tyranny through his use in antithesis, metaphor, and rhetorical questioning, thus instilling the value of independence to his audience in the Virginia House of Burgesses. As aware as Patrick Henry is about many economic situations, he explains what he is willing to do to attain his goal which, is to take “… [The] course others may [not] take;……

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays