Coal Argumentative Essay

Great Essays
So removing coal isn’t an option, at least not without a gradual process and well thought out plan. Even then, coal mining creates jobs. Over 174,000 jobs are created by coal in the United States, and this number does not include jobs that are indirectly made possible which is in the tens of thousands. This information can be found on Sourcewatch’s article titled “Coal and Jobs in the United States”. And with the addition of scrubbers making coal a very clean process, why should we remove it? Coal should neither grow nor shrink, it provides a large chuck of the nation’s power, but overexpansion could inflate coal prices and damage the environment despite scrubbers.

Finally, onto the reason this paper exist, nuclear energy. Nuclear energy
…show more content…
Because it’s very profitable, these power plants can produce energy for a very cheap price. These power plants on average produce about 3 times more profits than their initial cost. On top of that, it creates good paying jobs for nuclear engineers for an annual wage of $102,950 on average according to Department of Labor. On top of this, nuclear reactors are only refueled about once every 18 months, and uranium consist of only 30% of the operating cost. Meaning that nuclear energy prices are far less volatile and therefor are very consistent unlike many of its …show more content…
And how neutrons that can break chemical bonds in your body are captured by special screening that are placed inside the reactor contain special nuclei to prevent the spread of harmful neutrons. The truth is, nuclear reactors do not output harmful death-rays over hundreds of miles that slowly kill you, as anti-nuclear groups make it seem. As well, he proves there is no possible way for the reactor to produce enough energy to cause a nuclear explosion even if every one of the many safety systems

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of TMI

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nuclear power has many positives to using them over any other type of power. An example of this is a reliable energy source because it can operate 24/7 for 18-24 months and it stops so the workers can refuel it. Another reason is this type of power does not release anything into the air and helps fight global warming because the power plants have avoided 64 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases. There's only been three major accidents produces less radioactive material than coal plants. Those are just some of the reasons why it is better than other types of power.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The primary audience of this article is subscribers to The Futurist magazine. More specifically it is aimed towards the people who are interested in learning more about the future of nuclear power. This group may encompass anyone ranging from a middle-aged garbage man to a high school teenager or even a grandpa looking out for the generations behind him. A person who wants to know more than the media portrays will read this article. The authors focus mainly on the benefits of nuclear power, but they also bring in the counterarguments to strengthen their argument.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, nuclear energy is extremely expensive, which can ultimately drain a nation's resources without providing any benefits. This is evident as the Office of Nuclear Energy found that nuclear power plant construction contains “high capital costs, licensing and regulatory approvals, coupled with long lead times and construction delays” (Advantages). In other words, the substantial financial investment required for nuclear energy projects often outweighs the potential benefits, leading to significant economic strain without necessarily delivering the expected returns. This highlights the inherent challenges associated with nuclear energy, which reveals it as a modern day Frankenstein, as the ambitious pursuit of power and progress may come at a devastating cost to society. Thus, while nuclear energy may offer potential solutions to energy needs, its economic burdens warrant careful consideration before widespread…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How fear of nuclear power is hurting the environment, is a title that would spike anyone’s curiosity. In 13 minutes and 58 seconds, Michael Shellenberger crafts an argument about how the fear of nuclear energy is unfounded and nuclear energy should be the go to clean energy of the world. Shellenberger starts off his TED talk by claiming to viewers that we are in the middle of a clean energy revolution. He backs this up through empirical evidence in his home state of California and through the examples of Germany, who gets half of their power through solar energy, and India who has promised to expand their energy from solar to that of 10 times California output. He also cites bill gates working in china with their engineers and those of MIT…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Transition: Shifting from Fossil Fuels to Solar and Nuclear Energy is a book that presents a definitively anti-fossil fuels stance on renewable energy written by Lester Brown, a lauded environmental scientist with more than 50 years of experience in the field of renewable energy who is certainly qualified to write about the topic. In the first half of the book, he discusses why society should phase out usage of fossil fuels, especially coal, as quickly as possible in order to prevent environmental and public health harms. In the second half, he focuses on the benefits of renewable forms of energy, such as solar and hydropower, while also discussing their drawbacks, especially in regard to hydropower. Overall, Brown’s arguments in…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though there are benefits of nuclear power there are also an abundance of issues. These issues include the stability of the reactors, the rigorous process workers take to dispose of waste, the possibility that in the near future scientist will be able to redirect the fuel cycle into more nuclear weapons, and the cost to run these…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With a nuclear reactor you get a lot of power without using a lot of…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nuclear power has a lot of benefits, especially towards the environment. For example, in Document A, it states that “nuclear power production releases no pollutants into the air.” Meaning that while the nuclear power plant is giving out energy for us, it’s not harming the environment. This is important because since it's not releasing any air pollutants, then its not releasing any greenhouse gasses, the earth’s temperature is going to decrease. It's a win win for both the humanity and Earth.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy Proposal

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    All sources except for “Thorium”, Ian Schultz’s article and the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency conclude that nuclear energy is reliable. The sources that do not state this deal with other aspects concerning nuclear energy such as cost and fuel. Another trend is the low cost of nuclear energy after the initial build of the plant, which is concluded by every source, but “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, “Unmatched Reliability” and “CO2 emission of electricity from nuclear power stations”. Finally, all sources but “Thorium”, the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency, Ian Schultz’s report, “Unmatched Reliability” and “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, discuss the low pollution of nuclear energy which is the last key point of my essay. • All of the sources are credible sources, because they are relevant, produced recently and are either organizations, education sites or databases.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    My first reason is, coal makes energy. If we don't have coal we don't have power. Power is really important because we won't be able to have lights, television, and air condition. Therefore coal is really important for us to have power. My second reason is, we could make a lot of money off of coal.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coal Energy vs Wind Energy The United States alone burns more than a billion tons of coal every year, making up more than half of the electricity used in the US from coal power. However, burning fossil fuels also causes 78 percent of the United States global warming emissions, 32 percent being from coal. In order to combat these pollutants and hopefully cut down prices different cleaner, and renewable energy alternatives are being used instead. One of these newer and effective forms of renewable energy is wind power, in order to understand the way these affect the environment, the process of each needs to be understood.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Coal

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Coal is a fossil fuel that is used mostly as an energy source for heat and electricity. Out of the three types of fossil fuel, it is also on the track to last longer than any of the other fossil fuels, and 40% of the electricity used around the world is made from coal. It is abundant, and found all over the world in large quantities. It is especially common in the U.S., which in 2005, had over half the states producing coal. Even though coal mining can ruin environmental landscapes, it provides more jobs, and after a mine is closed down, the company starts the process of reclamation.…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Coal Argument Essay

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nuclear provide a small amount of energy to US. “the technology is very demanding … and political consequences of nuclear accidents are unpredictable” (Chesshire, 247).The radioactive waste is hard to get rid of and decomposed in a long time. For example, the Fukushima nuclear incident, during Japan’s earthquake of 2011, caused many people fear against nuclear power. “Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant—ground zero of the worst atomic meltdown since Chernobyl” (Beech). Nuclear rarely happen but when it does, it is really bad.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Industrial Revolution pioneered a new age of technology, making coal the primary source of power for the developing world. Coal is a combustible fossil fuel that is extracted by surface and underground mining mainly located in the United States, China, and Australia. The coal mining industry is thought of as a crucial part in the world’s job economy. And that without it we would not advance as a society due to coal mining originally driving advancements in the world. Despite allowing some of the greatest technological achievements in human history the continued use of coal will destroy the world which we have made such great advancements in due to its pollution.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays