Coal Energy Vs Nuclear Energy

Improved Essays
Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.

Development: The energy produced would be the amount of kilowatt hours produced per unit of fuel in a reactor. While coal is purported to be inexpensive, it releases a huge
…show more content…
The paper detailed how the energy was to be analysed, and also cited many sources saying that it can be analysed, and that the results would reflect reality.
And while the efficiency in a nuclear reactor is approximately the same, the amount of energy produced is much higher. Even though the turbine technology is the same, the amount of heat in kWh produced by one kilogram of uranium is approximately 24 million compared to 8 from coal and 12 from mineral oil [4]. While these numbers aren’t precise, they give a general understanding of comparison.
How much waste is produced by Coal Fired power plants vs. Nuclear Power plants?
Each year, fossil fuels rely on a huge amount of resources to keep the power plants going. This amount of resources is not only harmful to the environment because of extraction, but also produces enormous amounts of waste currently, the total amount of crude oil consumed is 1.4 million tonnes per year, and produces 5 million tonnes of CO2, 40 thousand tonnes of So2 and 50 thousand tonnes of nitrous oxides and other particulates [1]
2 million tonnes of coal produce 6 million tonnes of CO2, 120 thousand tonnes of SO2, 25 thousand tonnes of nitrous oxides, and 300 thousand tonnes of particulates
…show more content…
This contrasts to coal fired units which emit copious amounts of substances that aren’t immediately deadly, and didn’t require immediate attention when they were first created thus leading to the environmental state we’re currently in. even though it’s true that nuclear fallout can be a serious problem, many reactors have several containment precautions. Even the incident at Three Mile Island which scared a nation into halting production of nuclear energy was mostly contained, and there have been no identifiable negative health effects [9].
Even considering the amount of current deaths because of both nuclear and fossil fuels, studies show that the amount of energy being produced by nuclear power instead of fossil fuels has actually saved tens of thousands of lives. The study estimated that for each terawatt hour of electricity produced, an average of 26.67 lives are lost whereas a terawatt hour of nuclear electricity kills an average of 0.074 people (stats relevant for Europe)

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Nuclear Energy Benefits

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The most commercialized benefit of nuclear energy is its low environment impact. Nuclear energy is a clean energy source, meaning it produces trace amounts of greenhouse gasses, such as carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere. Awareness about climate change has influenced people and policy to push for alternative energy initiatives like the Clean Air Act of 1970, or the European Union’s 20/20/20 policy (2008) to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions. “In 2012, the Energy Information Administration reported that greenhouse gas emissions in the power sector were 15 percent below 2005 levels, due in part to carbon-free electricity produced by nuclear energy.”(Nuclear Energy Institute). Repurposing nuclear elements and byproduct increases output and decreases nuclear waste, another reason that nuclear energy is the most responsible and resourceful energy alternative.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear power plants provide 20% of the U.S. power. What economic advantages does nuclear energy have ?It creates jobs, it cheap electricity, and had a low fuel cost. It creates jobs because there are many jobs that deal with nuclear energy. Some may be dangerous but they pay good money.Nuclear energy facilities generate electricity 24/7 at a 92 percent capacity factor. This is more efficient than other types of energy—combined-cycle natural gas, with a 47.8 percent capacity factor; coal-fired at 60.9 percent; and wind at 33.9 percent.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Also, there 's really not much waste: the US disposes of 1000 times more EPA-registered hazardous waste materials (e.g., mercury, benzene, coal ash, etc. ), than radioactive waste. Waste can be safely stored in rock tunnels like Yucca, salt caverns like New Mexico, or deep boreholes, and new reactor designs can reduce the amount of waste that is produced. Lastly, nuclear weapons are derived from purpose-built reactors or centrifuges, not power plants, which is a common…

    • 2141 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear reprocessing does not eliminate the need for a repository, but also reduces the volume, along with that it also reduces the long term radiation hazard and heat dissipation capacity needed. It is possible to use waste heat in cogeneration applications such as district heating. Nuclear stations are generally not built in densely populated areas. Waste heat is more commonly used in industrial applications. So here we have an natural advantage of nuclear energy.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They have many similarities and differences, but solar power is is still a better source. Both Nuclear and Solar are power sources for humans, but solar power is more convenient that nuclear. There is a cost to build both nuclear power plants and solar power farms, but solar power plants cost a lot more. However, the cost of the fuel for nuclear power (uranium) is expensive while the cost of the fuel for solar power is free. Both solar power and nuclear…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By comparison, electricity produced by coal was 3.27 cents per kilowatt-hour and natural gas 3.4 cents. (http://www.nuclearmatters.com/economic-engines/low-costs) That’s a a 0.87 cent difference between nuclear energy and coal, and a one dollar difference between natural gas and nuclear. Seemingly, not much of a difference all exempting the benefits nuclear energy has. Even so, building more of these plants may be costly as they accumulate, although they will employ many more people and the risks would decrease as they would monitor them closely and…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Nuclear Energy

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Now, all fuel to create energy comes with a cost, but nuclear energy is very efficient with that. The cost of nuclear fuel is 20% of the cost of energy generated, making nuclear energy profusely efficient (Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear Power). In summary, not only does nuclear energy already play a large role in providing electricity for us, but it also does so in a very efficient way. Because of this, nuclear energy should be more…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This causes harm to the environment, and is a major factor in global warming. Nuclear energy can solve this issue. Regular coal emits 955 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt-hour, compared to nuclear energy, which only emits 4 grams per kilowatt-hour (By The Numbers). With nuclear power plants producing over one hundred times less carbon dioxide than coal plants, nuclear energy is a much cleaner and safer option for the environment.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Game Changer

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Our constant use of fossil fuels, the most prominent alternative to nuclear energy, is a detriment to this planet. If we continue on with releasing approximately 730 tons of carbon dioxide per second,14 rising sea levels due to global warming will eventually swallow up small islands, melt icebergs, and push arctic animals to endangerment or extinction. People often fail to realize the deleterious long-term effects of global warming, which can be avoided with more efficient sources of power. Nuclear energy emits little carbon dioxide, no nitrogen oxides, and no sulfur oxide, and it is much more efficient. “Just one uranium fuel pellet [...] contains the same amount of energy as 17,000 cubic feet of natural gas, 1,780 pounds of coal or 149 gallons of oil.”15 Not only is uranium more efficient, but there is much larger supply of it than there is of natural gases and oil, which are estimated to run out within decades.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lastly one must must look at the potential effects on future generations. Nuclear power is one of the cheapest forms of energy compared to other sources such as oil and coal. According to studies done by professor Nolan E, Hertel, professor of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology, the cost of producing nuclear energy as of 2007 was 1.7 cents per kilowatt hour compared to 2.4 cents for coal, 6.7 cents for natural gas, and 10.2 cents for oil. However does this affordability come at a cost? According to Max Schulz at the center for Energy Policy and the Environment at the Manhattan Institute, there has not been a single accident or fatality involving exposure or harm at a nuclear power plant since the start of their operations in the United States (MI).…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics