Why The World May Turn To Nuclear Power Summary

Improved Essays
1. “Why the World May Turn to Nuclear Power” is a passage that lays out all of the main components of Nuclear energy. It is filled with statistics and real world examples, including visual aids. The major purpose of this text is to inform the reader that nuclear power is in fact a beneficial form of energy. Three images on page 18 show nuclear power in action. The bottom right picture illustrates a woman repowering her Nissan LEAF car with the help of nuclear energy. The authors tell us that nuclear power is becoming increasingly popular worldwide by stating, “Nuclear power is experiencing a worldwide rebirth,” and “electrification is expanding” (Stieglitz and Docksai 17-19). America needs to start funding nuclear power because it is quite …show more content…
The primary audience of this article is subscribers to The Futurist magazine. More specifically it is aimed towards the people who are interested in learning more about the future of nuclear power. This group may encompass anyone ranging from a middle-aged garbage man to a high school teenager or even a grandpa looking out for the generations behind him. A person who wants to know more than the media portrays will read this article. The authors focus mainly on the benefits of nuclear power, but they also bring in the counterarguments to strengthen their argument. The reader is most aware of the downfalls of nuclear power because that is what the media conveys to the public. The Three Mile Island incident is brought up more than once in this article and most people are familiar with this because it made worldwide news in 1979. A small portion of the text is a review, but most of it is new information. One piece of information that caught my eye was the portion that discussed the Obama administration: “President Obama eliminated funding… for the state-of-the-art nuclear waste storage facility at Yucca Mountain, Nevada” (Stieglitz and Docksai 17). Nearly all of the statistics were new information. One statistic that stands out in the article is: “at the end of 2007 the world had 439 operating nuclear reactors producing 372 gigawatts of electricity” (Stieglitz and Docksai 20). This article provides readers with enough information in regards to nuclear power …show more content…
“Why the World May Turn to Nuclear Power” is a statistically based article. Consequently, logos appear throughout the passage. Figure 1, located on the top right corner of page 19, shows the percentages of nuclear power used for 17 different countries in the years of 1998 and 2008. According to the table, Lithuania was the nuclear energy leader in 2008 with 77.2% and France in 2008 with 76.2%. The article also predicts what the future will bring of nuclear power. The authors state, “by 2020… worldwide, 112 new nuclear reactors in 25 countries are planned” (Stieglitz and Docksai 20). The magazine is called The Futurist, so it makes sense as to why the authors include statistics in regards to the future of nuclear power. At the very end of the article there is an about the authors excerpt. This section is an indicator of ethos. It states that Richard G. Stieglitz has a PhD in nuclear engineering, and he served ten years in the U.S. Navy refueling nuclear submarines. He is a reliable man because of his personal experiences in the field of nuclear

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This is significant as it showcases that despite the valiant intentions, nuclear energy produces destructive effects on humans. Thus, nuclear energy represents a modern-day Frankenstein as it promises incomparable great benefits, however it ultimately unleashes more dangerous consequences that require constant vigilance to…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The documentary that was first shown in 2013 and is approximately 83 minutes long, does an excellent job of creating a debate about the perception of nuclear energy in challenging global climate change during the 21st century. This documentary film's main argument is that nuclear power, yet contradicted by many environmentalists, is a relatively safe and harmless source of energy if compared to other energy sources and can counteract…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Population is growing and they need electric to stay in contact, building a nuclear plant must be involved but in a way that help society, because nuclear can help environment to clean up from pollutants and also will stop us using coal, however, coal will finish in future, while energy can’t destroy it or remove it. (Mizuo…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spencer compares U.S. nuclear industry to that of Japan stating that “it no longer dominates the global commercial nuclear industry as it did when it was building new nuclear plants in the 1970s and 1980s.” This is a fallacy of presumption since he lacks evidence that indications the downfall of U.S. nuclear energy was due to its failure to build new power plant. This point also lacks relevance with the rest of the article. Furthermore, he asserts that the reason as to why Japan chose nuclear energy was because it lacked adequate natural resources. In his article, he lacks evidence that…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When the term Nuclear Power or Nuclear Energy is used usually the first thing that comes to mind for most people are war, bombs, deformed humans, and destruction. In fact, these are four things that least occur in the nuclear field. Yes, war, bombs, and what not are used, but also most of all the nuclear energy used in today’s society comes in the form of production of electricity. Therefore, we do get something good out of it.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saying “No” to Nuclear Power As of 2003, 49,000 metric tons of nuclear waste has been produced in the United States alone. Every day, more and more of this incredibly dangerous substance is released into our planet’s soil. Nuclear power seems like a good idea on the surface, but obviously, it is not the answer. Nuclear power is too dangerous, too expensive, and unable to be contained, therefore it should not be the world’s primary source of energy.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nuclear power has a lot of benefits, especially towards the environment. For example, in Document A, it states that “nuclear power production releases no pollutants into the air.” Meaning that while the nuclear power plant is giving out energy for us, it’s not harming the environment. This is important because since it's not releasing any air pollutants, then its not releasing any greenhouse gasses, the earth’s temperature is going to decrease. It's a win win for both the humanity and Earth.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When to world witnessed the atomic bomb, it was in fear and awe! The amount of destruction it caused was unparalleled by anything in its time; and still is the most powerful weapon mankind has ever came to conceive. With one fell swoop it ended the Second World War. But in that blood lust, came its opposite; in that same power came fusion, and thus, nuclear power! Nuclear power can be the solution power crisis that will face humanity in the next twenty or so years.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy Proposal

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    All sources except for “Thorium”, Ian Schultz’s article and the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency conclude that nuclear energy is reliable. The sources that do not state this deal with other aspects concerning nuclear energy such as cost and fuel. Another trend is the low cost of nuclear energy after the initial build of the plant, which is concluded by every source, but “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, “Unmatched Reliability” and “CO2 emission of electricity from nuclear power stations”. Finally, all sources but “Thorium”, the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency, Ian Schultz’s report, “Unmatched Reliability” and “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, discuss the low pollution of nuclear energy which is the last key point of my essay. • All of the sources are credible sources, because they are relevant, produced recently and are either organizations, education sites or databases.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It has been almost 70 years since the end of World War II. Today, nuclear power is used in everywhere, and it has become a very familiar thing to people. It is used in nuclear power plants, cancer treatments, radiocarbon dating for research and investigation purpose, and even in every household like smoke detectors. It has been contributing greatly to the modern society, and made people’s life better. However, its fast development is inseparable from the Manhattan Project in the World War II and the cruel results of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Controversy

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Developing countries and rising powers are using nuclear powers as their source of energy to provide for their expanding economics. (Nuclear Energy) Fear has run through the hearts of many Americans with the idea of a terrorist attack on nuclear power plants. Ever since the attack on New York’s Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, the vulnerable of the nuclear facilities have scared many Americans citizens. If an attack on reactors and facilities were to happen, the results would be end up being much worse than Chernobyl.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Women Vs Nuclear Energy

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The energy crisis seems to be a common topic for newsstands and debates all over. Due to the imminent loss of fossil fuels, it is imperative that a solution be found. Many believe that nuclear energy could be our ticket out of this crisis. These people believe that if France can produce 76.9% of its energy from nuclear reactors, the world could easily depend on nuclear energy (“World Statistics”). Two organizations, the Nuclear Energy Institute and Women in Nuclear, argue that development of the nuclear energy industry could be beneficial to all.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate surrounding nuclear power has been a hot one for some time now. With the inevitable end of fossil fuels, many more people are starting to make a decision on what they believe is the best alternative. As students at the University of South Florida, we are often preoccupied by lesser issues such as final exams or better food on campus. However, we are here to better our future, and there are many ways we can while we are here. One of them just so happens to be getting involved in the nuclear energy debate.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rise Of Nuclear Power

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The rise of nuclear power started back in 2000 with the election of George W. Bush; it was with him that the development of nuclear power plants started to form in the United States. One of the countries that turned to nuclear energy was India, but it wasn’t until 2005 with the Nuclear Treaty, that it actually came into the picture and developed their Nuclear Sector. Then in 2010 India’s government passed the Civil Nuclear Liability for Damage Act, which dealt with any nuclear damages that happen to India. As of 2012, India has seven Nuclear Power Plants, generating 4,780 MW of energy. With the rapid growth of population the demand for electricity also increased each time, making it harder for the industrialization of power to produce just…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays