Nuclear Reactors In Brooklyn

Improved Essays
We should not build a nuclear reactor in Brooklyn due to the various dangerous effects it promotes. The reasons why we should not construct a nuclear reactor is that it’s expensive to build, the hazardous risks it produces towards human health, and the fact that it is not a clean energy source. Building a nuclear reactor requires excessive money that the government must provide. Its construction is extremely expensive because “Including Price Anderson limitations on nuclear liability, the federal subsidies reach $145.5 billion” (The Fatal Flaws of Nuclear Power). Although, Patrick Moore stated that “It is in fact one of the least expensive energy sources” (Going Nuclear; A Green Makes the Case). However, he is inaccurate because in “The Fatal Flaws of Nuclear Power”, it discusses about the additional expenses of nuclear power since “Other aspects of nuclear power, such as the pollution from uranium mining, risks from nuclear weapons proliferation, dangers of reactor accidents, and the legacy of radioactive waste, are further hidden costs.” This demonstrates that constructing a nuclear reactor is highly priced, along with numerous other requirements that necessitate funds. Additionally, nuclear power generates harmful risks towards humans. Based on …show more content…
One advantage is that nuclear reactors are vulnerable to terrorist attack because “The six-feet-thick reinforced concrete containment vessel protects the contents from the outside as well as the inside” (Going Nuclear; A Green Makes the Case). Besides the fact that nuclear plants provide electricity, it also saves us money because “The U.S. saves $12 billion dollars each year for energy costs because of nuclear power” (Nuclear Power: The Good, The Bad, and The Beautiful). Although nuclear reactors may be beneficial, there are still a more immense amount of dangerous effects along with it if we build one in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some people who live in Richmond don’t want to agree on constructing a nuclear power plant because of they are frightened that it’s going to explode and cause a lot of damage. In March 1979, an accident occur in The Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania which allowed a small leakage of radiation surround the atmosphere. Many people would fear that it can harm their health, but in Document A it states that “the leak had no demonstrable effect on the health of anyone at the plant or in the surrounding area.” In other words, the small leakage didn't put anyones health and the environments’ in danger. By this, we know that building a nuclear power has more pros than cons, and that there is nothing to worry about.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans, and the rest of the world, should switch to nuclear power because it produces great amounts of energy with little to no waste, is constantly available and reusable, and nuclear energy is safe. Nuclear energy provides great amounts of energy with very little amounts of nuclear material. In the documentary “Pandora’s Promise” Leonard Koch(died on the fifteenth of may in 2015) said that “one pound of uranium, which is about the size of my fingertip, would produce the same amount of energy as five thousand barrels of oil.” Now in one forty-two gallon barrel of oil there is five point eight million btu(british thermal units), one btu would raise a pot of water one degree. Multiply five point eight million by five thousand, and you get…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The article “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even After Fukushima” by William Tucker portrays that all energy technologies have risks and that the world needs to use nuclear technology to help maintain the standard of living. For example, the natural gas explosion in Cleveland, the coal mining in china, and the hydroelectric dam collapse in Japan are all examples of technology accidents. Tucker implies that nuclear power does have some risks but it is still one of the best sources of energy. Uranium fuel rods cam sit in a reactor core for up to five years and power a city close to the size of San Francisco. Nuclear reactors can last quite a long time before they need to be refilled and can supply to a big chunk of the world with very little…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotated Bibliography Topic: Nuclear Energy Thesis: While nuclear energy has many benefits, the negative implications must be considered. " Fukushima's Radioactive Water Leak: What You Should Know. "…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy Proposal

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    All sources except for “Thorium”, Ian Schultz’s article and the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency conclude that nuclear energy is reliable. The sources that do not state this deal with other aspects concerning nuclear energy such as cost and fuel. Another trend is the low cost of nuclear energy after the initial build of the plant, which is concluded by every source, but “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, “Unmatched Reliability” and “CO2 emission of electricity from nuclear power stations”. Finally, all sources but “Thorium”, the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency, Ian Schultz’s report, “Unmatched Reliability” and “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, discuss the low pollution of nuclear energy which is the last key point of my essay. • All of the sources are credible sources, because they are relevant, produced recently and are either organizations, education sites or databases.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Farther into book Ferguson gives background information on nuclear energy and the health risks that can develop from it. People exposed to too much ionizing radiation over long periods of time are at a higher risk for developing cancer; however, the human body can fight off ionizing radiation in low dosages, so containing the amount of…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear power is a better benefit to atmosphere and the world itself than coal. Nuclear power releases less greenhouse gases than coal making it environmentally friendly. For this reason we are better off choosing nuclear power rather than coal. Coal power plants are one of the biggest contributors to global warming. On the other hand nuclear power plants release little to no harmful gasses into the atmosphere.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though there are benefits of nuclear power there are also an abundance of issues. These issues include the stability of the reactors, the rigorous process workers take to dispose of waste, the possibility that in the near future scientist will be able to redirect the fuel cycle into more nuclear weapons, and the cost to run these…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another plus of Nuclear energy is its footprint on the area of the earth is very small. Wind and solar take up quite a bit of area. Even though the wind turbine itself only takes up a small area, the land around it is pretty much useless except to let farm animals graze. Solar panels can use some useless space on top of buildings, but that doesn’t really amount to enough energy, so solar farms are built. A nuclear reactor can be the size of a semi truck, fit in a submarine, or the size of a house.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Coal Argument Essay

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nuclear provide a small amount of energy to US. “the technology is very demanding … and political consequences of nuclear accidents are unpredictable” (Chesshire, 247).The radioactive waste is hard to get rid of and decomposed in a long time. For example, the Fukushima nuclear incident, during Japan’s earthquake of 2011, caused many people fear against nuclear power. “Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant—ground zero of the worst atomic meltdown since Chernobyl” (Beech). Nuclear rarely happen but when it does, it is really bad.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear Fission Benefits

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Two benefits of nuclear fission technology for society are that significantly fewer amounts of greenhouses gases are being released into the atmosphere, compared to fossil fuels. This results in a slowed rate of pollution and global warming. Another benefit is that power created through nuclear fission is immense and is able to meet the demands of large and industrial cities as well as the suburban towns too. Also the energy is quick to create too, which means that immense amount of energy can be created in emergency situations.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additional positive fundamentals of adopting nuclear energy are the fact that it produces higher quantities of energy and is far more efficient, the quantity of energy released from uranium per gram is much more than that of fossil fuels such as oil or coal. Nuclear power is approximately 8,000 times more efficient that the primary source of energy today. Despite there being a lesser quantity of uranium resources in the world compared to fossil fuel resources, the potential amount of energy produced is still greater to that to coal or…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Cost Essay

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nuclear reactors cost billions of dollars to build. One author wrote that, “The current theoretical overnight cost of constructing a nuclear power plant is about 2 to 2.5 billion dollars for a plant with two conventional reactors and generating about 2 gigawatts – a nominally sized plant (What Does It Cost to Build a Nuclear Plant? What Could It Cost?).” While it’s somewhat true that the cost of running a nuclear plant is cheap, only after construction is completed and yearly licenses are paid for is that statement really true. “However, when capital costs of nuclear energy is examined, it becomes apparent that current policies are far from generous to any potential plant construction,” says one author (What Does It Cost to Build a Nuclear Plant?…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear power has been under debate for many years; with issues such as environmental impact, safety, cost, waste management, and efficiency, the cons clearly outweigh the pros. Nuclear power plants have been supplying electricity to the population for nearly 60 years, but all things must come to an end as better options emerge and humanity develops as a species. It 's only natural for things to become outdated, or be replaced by better options as they become available. Nuclear power is a source of energy, created through a reaction when a uranium atom is split, releasing heat that is used to produce electricity. It was initially used as an alternative to coal, as coal-burning facilities were becoming a hazard to the environment.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays